Gravity Control Idealism

Time Lines and Distortions

2008-01-06T12:38:00.002-08:00

In order to understand what time lines are we need to revisit the Apollo missions, which began in 1969.

When the first lunar samples arrived at the Johnson Space Center they were placed in quarantine while tests were conducted to determine if the lunar samples represented a hazard to the Earth's ecology.

Both plant and animal species were subjected to and/or injected with a solution of water containing finely pulverized Moon rock. In one particular test both corn and bean seeds were watered with this Moon rock solution. The seeds germinated and the resulting plants grew at an accelerated rate--but they also developed genetic deformities and cancerous growths.

Initially I speculated that the lunar samples would affect accelerated growth in plants, but I had not considered the possibility of genetic deformities or cancerous growths developing. So this was a shocking revelation to say the least.

Today NASA denies the original test results and claims that none of the various plant and animal species subjected to or injected with the lunar solution suffered any ill effects whatsoever, but it does maintain that the lunar solution affected accelerated growth in plants.

However, these radical effects did occur and should have brought the space program to a grinding halt. We should have gone back to the drawing board in order to develop the science and technology necessary to access the environment of another planetary body safely and efficiently, but this did not happen. It was business as usual and still is.

Einstein once said that time is different for every system in motion and of course it is, but what exactly does this mean? Unfortunately, Einstein viewed the universe in terms of linear proportions, which in turn limited our view and our understanding of the universe as well as much of what he himself was attempting to convey.

Certainly we need linear proportions to build a house, but when it comes to the basic principles of the universe those same linear proportions get us into trouble with respect to our ambition to establish a manned base on the Moon or to colonize another planetary body.

The planets, moons and stars share a non-linear relationship which includes time lines, in that lunar time runs much faster than Earth time. So, the aspect of the Moon which presents itself to us is in fact lunar history or the lunar past existing in our Earth's present.

And in that time is different on the Moon the Moon is dynamically out of sync with our terrestrial environment. The underlying dynamics affecting the form and function of lunar material are significantly out of step with the underlying dynamics affecting the form and function of Earthly material.

It should be noted that there is an energy differential existing between the Earth and the Moon in relation to the underlying energy affecting the form and function of physical structure. In this respect lunar materials have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than our Earthly materials.

Consequently the Moon has a distortional effect on the Earth and lunar materials have a distortional effect on the dynamics of terrestrial flora and fauna.

We seem to have the idea that the only thing separating us from the Moon is a certain linear distance, much like the distance between one city and another, measured in miles or kilometers, but this is hardly the case.

So why do we ignore time lines and behave as if they do not exist?

To start with someone would have to explain why government agencies have been hiding critical information not only from the public but from NASA scientists and engineers--information critical to establishing a manned base on the Moon or colonizing another planetary body.

At the present time we are talking about a manned mission to Mars and considering the possibility of utilizing Martian water to sustain the mission crew. But if Mars is out of sync with our Earth so is Martian water out of sync with the biological chemistry of the mission crew. So the apparent or real purity of Martian water is not the problem or the issue: it is the underlying dynamics of the water which would ultimately affect the health and safety of the mission crew.

If it were know that a manned mission to Mars was presently beyond our reach and the establishment of a manned base on the Moon was not feasible or even reasonable at this time, I don't doubt that funding for the space program might be significantly curtailed. And without radical advances in science and technology NASA activities might eventually come to a grinding halt.

We require a whole new approach to the space program, starting with the basic scientific principles governing time and space, which means we must start from square one and move forward as advances allow.

Time-line differentials

Time lines are not just a wild idea but a real and present obstacle to manned missions beyond the boundaries of our own planet.

Time lines correspond to energy differentials, in relation to an underlying force of energy affecting the form and function of all physical structure. This is not an easy concept to grasp, but it is essential to our astronauts if they are to survive the environmental impact of direct contact with and/or exposure to another planetary body.

Many assume that we know what energy is but for the most part we are still unsure as to what it really is. We equate energy with a resistant force in that a factor of resistance limits the efficiency of any fuel-driven motorized system. And without an energetic force of resistance we consider it impossible to maintain the flow of energy required to sustain our human industry.

If we are wrong about this and energy is not a resistant force but a dynamic underlying non-resistant force which is continually increasing we might understand that the consumption of fuels in the form of gases, liquids and solids provides us with no actual energy.

Every element of our physical world is governed by time lines--differentials in the underlying energy sustaining and perpetuating all physical matter. Without these time line differentials nothing would happen and there would be no physical matter.

The form and function of physical structure is determined on the basis of a dynamic differential in the underlying energy of the universe, in terms of Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration (NTFFA). In this respect NTFFA accelerates and decelerates in opposite directions simultaneously, which in effect allows time lines to exist.

We have managed to convince ourselves that the universe is linearly structured, whereby we might actually measure the proportions of the universe with a meter-rule without ever considering the dynamic nature or the simultaneous relationship of time and space.

Are radio response delays between ground control and space due to the linear distance involved or are they due to a difference in time itself? The answer to this question is extremely important if we are going to understand the true nature of time and space, as there is nothing static about the condition or the properties of the universe.

Each and every interaction between two or more systems involves time-line differentials in relation to a differential in the underlying energy of each system acting upon the dynamics of every other system. Such interactions can be viewed in terms of distortions, as the field of each system has a distortional effect on every other system; the greater the underlying energy of any specific system the greater the distortional effect it exerts upon all other systems.

Every system of the universe corresponds to a condition of the universe remaining relative to it, as the system of reference determines the relationship of all systems remaining relative to it, but the relationship is not limited to the condition of the universe remaining relative to a single system of reference.

There is a unique and different condition of the universe associated with each and every system due to differentials in the time lines involved. And all conditions of the universe associated with the different systems exist simultaneously, but these different systems also exist in terms of either past or future conditions remaining relative to the system of reference.

What we have to understand is that the universe is not linearly structured or linearly driven. We cannot apply static terms of reference to a dynamic system, as such terms do not apply to the dynamic nature of the universe. Both time and space are continuously changing due to the dynamic nature of the underlying force sustaining and perpetuating the universe.

Time lines confine us to a specific condition of the universe, in relation to the unified field state of our planet Earth. This unified field state does not correspond to that of any other system, as each and every system corresponds to a non-absolute state and/or condition of the universe.

How this is applicable to our existing situation is quite simple; we must adjust our perception to fit the true nature of the universe rather than hope that the universe will somehow correspond to our preconceived concepts.

Instantaneous communication

If we wish to establish a manned base on the Moon, we must formulate a method by which to access uniformly the time lines involved, whereby we might establish an avenue of access compatible to the existence of the mission crew.

This means that the successful establishment of a manned base on the Moon would not be accessible or even visible to those who remained behind on Earth, as there would be a well-defined time line differential and/or gap existing between the lunar base and ground control on Earth.

Therefore, new methods of communication must be developed--methods which allow for instantaneous communication across time lines. This in itself would allow for instantaneous communication to any point in time and space corresponding to past and/or future conditions of the universe.

Some refer to this as "gravitic communications". Gravity itself is instantaneous. There is no speed to gravity, which is why it is impossible to detect gravitons and/or gravity waves. Gravity is simply a condition of field as determined by the underlying force of energy sustaining and perpetuating the dynamics of any unified field system.

In order to understand the instantaneous nature of the universe and better understand time lines we might reconsider the idea we have about light speed--that the linear motion of light can be measured using a one-meter rule and a clock. In this respect it has been determined that the speed of light corresponds to the time it takes light to travel a distance of one meter, said to be exactly 1/299,792,458ths of a second.

We wrongly assume that each of the 299,792,458 portions of a second are of exactly the same linear duration, which means we are using static terms and assuming each portion of a second to be of an absolute value.

On the basis of this assessment, we wrongly define "c" as a universal constant, which in itself defines our perception of the universe. This allows us to measure the properties of the universe in terms of light-years despite the fact that there are no light-years or even any linear years to count. So, we make reference to millions and billions of years in relation to the age of our planet Earth and to millions and billions of light-years in relation to the size and age of the universe without considering the simultaneous nature of universe.

Time lines do not correspond to linear durations of time, but correspond to simultaneous differentials in non-linear time field frequency acceleration (NTFFA). The past and future do not exist in terms of linear durations but do exist in terms of a simultaneous condition of the universe, whereby time lines take on a purposeful meaning. Therefore the concept of instantaneous transformation is not only a possibility but a fundamental aspect of the universe.

Time perception

It is important that we reconsider our existing perception of time, as our reference to something having occurred 10 or 20 years ago sets up a mental frame of reference whereby we think in terms of linear durations without realizing that there are no actual linear years to count.

This should be evident when we make reference to the age of the universe corresponding to billions of years and consider the possibility that we could take photographs of past conditions through the lens of a telescope. We think we can see into the past by looking away from the Earth, simply by equating distance with time.

Unfortunately time does not correspond to a linear duration or a linear distance. Time itself is the primary cause affecting the condition of universe. In this respect time determines the simultaneous nature of the universe in terms of cause and effect.

If time is different for every system in motion it should appear evident that all systems must exist simultaneously in order that they might exist together within the bounds of a single unified field system. And as each system itself exists as a unified field system all conditions of the universe must exist simultaneously in order that they might exist at all.

Therefore our perception of the universe should correspond to a simultaneous condition of the universe, in that time accelerates symmetrically to the center of the field and simultaneously decelerates isometrically in an inversely proportional manner. This alone allows for the existence of space in relation to the condition of the universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

In this respect each system is separated by a time line differential and not by linear distance. Our attempt to apply linear proportions to the dimensions of space results in a flawed perception and/or concept of time and space. Although it may not appear obvious to everyone this is the one thing stopping us from moving forward. We appear to be stuck in the linear mode.

Mass and energy

We tend to equate energy with mass without considering that the ratio of energy per unit of mass is not the same for all materials. We merely assume that more mass corresponds to more energy. In a very general sense this is true, but it is far from an accurate assessment concerning the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

In relation to the underlying force of energy, referred to as NTFFA, the smaller mass of a similar material has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass. In terms of a single atom structure hydrogen has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass of any known element. This suggests that hydrogen should be viewed as the most energetic material of universe.

It is due to the high ratio of energy per unit of mass that hydrogen represents roughly 75% of the universe's physical matter. The hydrogen time line runs much faster than that of any other element, whereby hydrogen is simply a very fast element. And because the universe is simultaneous in nature and hydrogen is highly accelerated there is a higher proportion of hydrogen than of any other element. Hydrogen is simply the least resistant element of the universe.

Sun-Earth distortions

If we consider the time line of the Sun in relation to the time line of our Earth we will find that the Sun, the center of the solar field, has an extremely high ratio of energy per unit of mass focused to its core.

The time line differential between the Earth and the Sun is immense and continuously increasing. This in itself provides the space existing between the Earth and the Sun.

As the time line differential increases so does the Earth's resistance to the solar field. The Sun is becoming less resistant to a further increase in energy much faster than the Earth is becoming less resistant to a further increase in energy.

A relative increase in resistance to the solar field will increase the Earth's mean temperature in relation to the Sun remaining remaining relative to the Earth.

If we consider that there is a simultaneous condition of the universe remaining relative to the Sun we might realize that we are subject to a historical aspect of the solar mass in relation to the simultaneous condition of the universe remaining relative to the Earth.

From this we might get a better sense of a time line differential and what it might mean to our future existence, as at the present time we seem ill-prepared for the consequences of the inevitable solar storm.

We must realize that we have been and are affecting our relationship with the Sun by creating distortional effects, which distort the uniformity of the Earth's field and in turn affect the Earth/Sun time line differential.

There is nothing more radical we can do to distort the Earth's field than to detonate a nuclear device, as a nuclear detonation does not release any actual energy in terms of NTFFA, but reduces the energy of the field through a process of distortion.

So not only are time lines important, but the stability of time lines is equally important, realizing of course that all time line differentials share a non-uniform relationship. And although all time line differentials are dynamic it is important that these dynamic differentials remain stable, which means the changes must be smooth and not involve erratic jumps and jiggles.

We do not seem to understand that these distortional effects not only affect the structural dynamics of the Earth, but also affect the underlying dynamics of the solar mass and the solar field. Why this is so misunderstood is due to the time line differential factor, as time line differentials hide these effects.

If we are affecting a future condition of the Sun we will not know exactly what the reaction is going to be until we get there. Consequently it is very easy to dismiss the idea at the present time, but once we do get there we can still dismiss the idea simply because there is no direct linear link between the cause and the effect.

Non-linear terms of reference

Time lines and time line differentials require that we view the universe and our relationship with the universe by employing non-linear terms of reference such as NTFFA, as NTFFA represents the available underlying energy affecting the form and function of all physical structure.

Therefore each and every system of the universe has a different NTFFA value, which includes everything from the micro components of atomic structure to galactic systems. The NTFFA value corresponds to the underlying energy of a unified field system.

Time lines are a basic component of physical structure in relation to the non-linear relationship existing between all systems with respect to the condition of the universe remaining relative to the system of reference. Change the system of reference and you change the condition of universe, as each system corresponds to a different condition of the universe in terms of its relative relationship with the universe.

Therefore we have what we refer to as a "multiverse" where the various conditions of the universe correspond to a seemingly infinite number of systems existing simultaneously in terms of past, present and future.

The strange thing about this is that it is impossible to distinguish past from future as there is no absolute present moment by which to make such a distinction possible. The universe exists on the basis of a truly dynamic process.

Time itself involves a continuance of field in the form of an accelerating underlying force of energy where both past and future exist simultaneously in relation to the non-absolute nature of the present moment.

This gives us something a great deal less materialistic than our existing perception allows for. The physical structure of the universe is determined on the basis of non-liner time line differentials in the form of unified field systems.

We have made every effort to avoid the inevitable consequences of a dynamic system by wrongly asserting the apparent stability of our solar system remaining unaltered for millions and/or billions of years. We have failed to consider the cyclical nature of the solar field.

Whether it is out of fear or simply due to an indifference to the consequences of denial we have chosen erroneously to reject time line differentials and the basic dynamics of the universe. And without considering our denial to represent a strategic failure we must also deny the possibility of our human survival.

If the quantum relationship of energy and mass is defined on the basis of time line differentials it would seem absurd if not insane to ignore the possibility of there being more than enough to sustain our human needs not only in terms of our energy requirements but in terms of unlimited abundance as well.

The Field

2007-06-21T04:02:00.001-07:00

Lynne McTaggart wrote a great book entitled "The Field", which has since been followed by several more, but there is still something missing. It would seem that the basic science associated with the field has not been considered.

Certainly experiments have been conducted demonstrating the effects of thought on the health of plants and animals, but this in itself is not something new. It has been shown that the intention of thought can influence the structure of ice crystals and affect responses in plants.

Recently, as well as historically, scientists have noted distinct changes in the light emission of various materials resulting from the intention of thought, which is assumed to indicate fluctuations in energy. And in such cases the light itself is considered to represent a source of energy. which although seemingly rational hides the real issues involved and effectively prevents further progress leading to a clear understanding of the field.

If we are to understand the field we must consider the actual dynamics affecting the condition of field, plus the relative nature of field and the underlying force of energy responsible for sustaining and perpetuating the condition of field. We have to do better than simply rationalize the obvious effects in terms of what is commonly accepted by the scientific establishment.

In this respect we must embrace the simultaneous nature of universe without which ESP and or thought transference would not be possible. If the condition of universe did not exist as a simultaneous unified field of frequency such things would not be possible, as they would not occur.

Thought is instantaneously transmitted and received regardless of the distance involved, as distance in terms of the space involved is merely a condition of field, just as gravity and electromagnetism are determined by the condition of field, in terms of dynamic responses. Therefore space is a dynamic response to the condition of field.

In relation to a simultaneous unified field system the supporting and or underlying force of energy is non-linear time field frequency acceleration, whereby space is simply the result of a relative differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

Thought bypasses the linear concept of space, time and motion. Because thought is not linear in nature there are no linear restraints in terms of space, time and motion.

Physical matter on the other hand is restricted by the restraints of space, time and motion, in respect to the speed of light being the upper speed limit of universe.

Yet the field itself is a non-linear system which is simultaneously unified in that all aspects of universe are simultaneously linked to each other in order to form a unified field of frequency remaining relative to the system of reference. And in that physical matter exists in terms of a continuance of field it is possible to influence the structural dynamics of physical matter through the medium of thoughtful intention in either a negative or positive manner.

In effect we create the reality of our world through the medium of our thoughtful intentions. The collective mind of humanity has the power to determine the outcome of any event whether we are consciously or unconsciously aware of our intent. There is no such thing as a random event, as all events are the effect of a cause.

The dynamics of field associated with a unified field system are inversely proportional in relation to an internal/external relationship, in that for every cause there is an equal and opposite reaction whereby the resistant response (reaction) of any mass must remain proportionally (equal) opposite to the underlying energy focused to the center of field in terms of a positive/negative relationship.

And the condition of field, as determined by the underlying force of energy is the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

The condition of universe involves a dynamic differential in the underlying force of energy, in terms of the non-absolute upper and lower limits of field frequency.

From this we should realize that instantaneous communication exists between all systems of universe, as the underlying force of energy provides a simultaneous connection to all points associated with the space, time and motion of universe.

Furthermore we have direct connection to both past and future, as both past and future exist in a simultaneous state while remaining relative to the present moment. And in this respect we are linked to the continuance of field, whereby we are directly linked to all people, all things and all places existing at all times associated with the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

So it should not surprise us that our intentions of thought influence the condition of physical structure, as it is our intention which produces such an effect.

I suggest reading the first 7 chapters of the book Unity which are located at http://www.gravitycontrol.org

The Vanishing Bees

2007-04-11T01:24:00.000-07:00

Bees are essential to the food chain, as they pollinate most of our food crops.  Without the bees there will be a significant drop in our agricultural harvest, which will result in shortages and rising prices.

This year many honey bee colonies have virtually vanished into thin air, as the hives are all but empty.  And to date no one is sure what has happened or why.

One scientist said this was an emergency, and it is.  In fact it is a clear and present danger to the security of the western world; it is a national security issue which is not being addressed.

Over the last several years many homing pigeons have vanished after release, they did not return home as they had so many times before.

Birds and bees navigate via the magnetic field of the earth and when that field is disturbed the birds and bees have no way to accurately navigate the rout home.

I consider the wireless transmission of very low frequency microwave communications to be a major part of the problem, as the resulting electromagnetic pollution distorts the dynamics of the field upon which the birds and bees are dependent for their navigation.

When we were restricted to ground line communications the electromagnetic effects were isolated to the confines of the telephone lines, but with wireless communications the electromagnetic effects are not isolated at all, they are everywhere.  There is simply no where you can go to avoid them other than tunneling underground.

We already know that VLF transmissions cause field distortions, which affect human memory and cause physical alterations to occur at a cellular level.

We have literally wrapped the planet in a web of microwave transmissions without considering the consequences and in some cases attempting to hide the consequences.

Now we have missing honey bee colonies in Europe, Canada and the USA on a scale that has never been seen before.

I spend a lot of time considering hard issues, such as the nuclear agenda and I’m okay with it, but this thing with the bees scares me.  This is more than serious, this is a full blown crisis, but without the appropriate responses.

Oh, isn’t that interesting.  Interesting, you might think it’s a bit more than interesting when you have nothing but potatoes to eat.

You see there is no way to pollinate all the crops by hand with a small paint brush, as it would take many millions of man hours to do what the bees have been doing every year without fail.

Without the bees to pollinate the crops they will be major food shortages and huge price increases.  So in effect many of us will simply not be able to afford adequate nourishment.  In some cases there will simply be no agricultural products to purchase, regardless of price.

So how important are these bees?  Once they are gone we will be on our way to oblivion too.

To think that the convenience of a wireless telephone or a wireless pc could be viewed as more important than our food supply indicates that we are an extremely dysfunctional bunch.

If it is not too late already we had better start yelling loud enough that our political leadership gets off its backside and starts responding to this crisis in an expedient manner.  Either that or accept the frightening possibility that we are in very serious trouble with no hope of recovery.

Crop Circle Dynamics

2007-02-20T00:35:00.000-08:00

Crop Circles might not sound too exciting, in relation to new energy issues, but there is a hidden surprise in store for anyone who wants to follow my logic.

From the sampling and testing of crops and soils taken from crop circles in a variety of countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada, Holland and the United States of America, it has been suggested that crop circles could be the result of meteorite showers and or meteorite falls.

In the soil inside crop circles small spheres of pure magnetized iron have been discovered, which appear to have been molten during the formation of the circle, due to microwave heating.

Meteorites of varying sizes burn up in our atmosphere on a daily basis and shower our planet with tons of meteorite dust every year.

To understand what happens to a meteorite as it falls to earth requires doing a little reading and I suggest the first 7 chapters of the book Unity available at www.gravitycontrol.org.

There is an underlying force referred to as non-linear time field frequency acceleration, (ntffa), the underlying force of universe which sustains and perpetuates the dynamic form and function of all physical structure.

When a mass is in free fall, it accelerates toward the earth at a rate proportional to the underlying dynamic force focused to the center of the earth’s core.  As a consequence the energy of the field in which the mass is falling is increasing and as the mass falls its underlying energy decreases in proportion to the increase energy of the field in which it is falling.

But when you have a falling mass which is also burning up and disintegrating as it falls, the initial mass of the meteorite is decreasing whereby its underlying energy potential is increasing, in respect to an increase in the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

And this is where it gets interesting as instead of the falling masses underlying energy decreasing as it falls, it is actually increasing.

By the time the meteorite completely burns up each of the microscopic particles has a surplus energy potential relative to the field in which they have been falling.

And because most meteorites consist of iron, a relatively stable element, these microscopic particles of iron are forced to release some of thier excess energy in the form of plasma.  If they were not stable they would simply transform to another state, in the form of a lighter element.  And it may be that some elements contained in meteorites do transform to a lighter state.

It is the underlying resonance of the elements contained in the meteorite fall which is transposed into the various designs of the crop circles, which is a subject unto itself.

The formation of crop circles is a very complex process, but the end result is that the microscopic particles of iron form into larger masses of iron, which are still very tiny masses in the form of perfect spheres.  And as they are magnetic they can be seen sticking to each other.

The energy of the plasma is pure energy, which is described in many cases as being roughly the size of a soft ball.  And as the plasma energy is focused to the center of the plasma sphere there is a factor of radiant resistance, which is capable of affecting the crop in the manner described, which is to bend the stalks of the crop and boil off the moisture from within.

The effects of this plasma are dependent on the origin of the meteorite causing the effects.  Of course they all come from space, but while some originate from relatively high energy sources, some do originate from relatively low energy sources, of which there is an abundance of both.

Meteorites originating from high energy sources have what appear to be beneficial effects, such as an increase in the rate of crop growth and an increase in the size and weight of crop kernels.

Meteorites originating from low energy sources affect a decrease in the rate of crop growth and a decrease in the size and weight of crop kernels.  In fact, in some cases these low energy source meteorites inhibit plant growth completely even after the field has been plowed, fertilized and reseeded and this effect can last for a period of two years.

In either case it must be noted that the underlying energy of the meteorites represents a non-uniform potential, in relation to a non-uniform differential in dynamic potential existing between the meteorite and the earth.

The importance of all this is that we do not need to use either fission or fusion reactors to produce power, as the controlled modulation of the underlying force is capable of providing all the power we could possibly use without depleting this new source of energy in any way whatsoever.

In fact the supply is limitless, as the underlying force is continuously accelerating and focused to the center of field.

It is possible to develop a prototype devise by which to test both the credibility and the efficiency of this radical innovation.  And if successful we would have solved our energy problem once and for all.

© 2007 David Barclay  www.gravitycontrol.org

Beyond the Horizon

2007-01-05T04:02:00.000-08:00

Looking up at the night sky we can observe distant star systems, which are located at great distances from our planet earth.  And these distances are so great that they are calculated in terms of light years and astronomical units.

In relation to the most distant stars we are told that the light we can now see took billions of years to reach us.  This light is said to have traveled through space at the speed of light for billions of years in order that we might see it today.

At the present time the speed of light is based on the time it takes light to travel a distance of one meter in a vacuum, which is said to be exactly 1/299,792,458ths of a second.  This means that the speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second.

Also, the speed of light is said to have remained constant for billions of years, whereby it might be possible to determine the distance involved.

Consequently astronomers take photographs of distant star systems and identify these photos as representing observations of conditions as they existed billions of years ago.  In other words it is possible to photograph events having occurred billions of years ago.

This would suggest that what we see is not what it appears to be at the present as it would have changed somewhat over the course of billions of years.  But we cannot see those changes, as they correspond to that which has occurred over the course of billions of years.

So if you get far enough away you can see the past in the present.  Sounds a little bit strange doesn’t it, because this suggests that space and time are equally proportional in relation to the constancy of light speed.

So time must be equally proportional regardless of distance and if that is true we are stuck with a linear universe, which must have been structured on the basis of static terms of reference.

In other words the universe is not dynamic, but exists in a static state or have we got a static dynamic universe?

Where is science going with this, as it is a contradiction to even consider the possibility of measuring billions of light years.  It is not even rational, never mind logical.

If the universe is acceleratively expanding the value of time and space must be changing, in terms of a dynamic state.  So how do you fit static terms into this picture?

And how does the speed of light remain constant over billions of years, but what is even more important; exactly what is a billion years?

Both the past and future exist simultaneously relative to the non-absolute present moment and in that time itself is dynamic it is either accelerating or decelerating relative to the system of reference.  So what are these billions of years that can be stretched out like bed sheets if the past and future exist simultaneously?

Someone is going to say this is space/time.  Right and the universe is linearly structured just like a brick school house?  I don’t think so.

So just how far off are we on our assessment of universe?

If the universe is not linearly structured and static terms cannot be applied to the condition of universe it would appear that the speed of light is not a linear consideration either.

It would appear that in a truly dynamic universe time must in fact slow with distance in relation to the isometric propagation of space from any system of reference, where space itself is a condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

Therefore we can see that if light traveled linearly through space, the light of these distant star systems would never reach us, nor would the light of our sun reach them.  So how is it that we can see distant star systems?

We observe what there is to be seen in the present moment, as the expansion of universe is a simultaneous response corresponding to the underlying force of energy focused to the center of our planet earth.  The process of sight does not respond to the linear motion of light, but to the dynamics of field in which the observer is situated.  And if those dynamics cause a simultaneous response to occur at a distance, the observation of distant star systems involves a dynamic response to the condition of field.

As both the past and future exist in a simultaneous state relative to the present, neither the past or the future correspond to a linear distance in space, but to a non-linear relationship between the present, past and future.

Therefore the photos of distant star systems do not have a historical reference, as the past is confined to the simultaneous condition of universe which is devoid of space and time corresponding to the present moment.

Time is not a linear consideration in terms of the structure and order of universe, as linear durations of time have a purely sociological base with no corresponding relationship to the actual age or size of universe.

Consequently it is impossible to know the age or size of universe in relation to static terms of reference, just as it is impossible to know whether we exist in the past or future of the earth’s existence, as there is no absolute present moment by which to make such a distinction possible.

But, in relation to all other systems, in terms of planets, moons and stars etc., remaining relative to our planet earth, the existing condition of each of these systems must represent either a future or past condition remaining relative to the present moment of the earth’s existence.

How much further off the tracks we could possibly get with our modern innovations of thought I do not know, but the existing perception of universe most commonly accepted to represent the situation does not come marginally close to the mark.

Glossary of terms related to Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration

2007-01-03T02:49:00.000-08:00

Glossary of terms related to Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration

The Douglas Files

2006-12-01T00:48:00.000-08:00

To read the Douglas Files available on the web go to http:/www.checktheevidence.com/DouglasDocs/

Under the heading of communication, reference is made to instantaneous communication, such as that associated with ESP and other similar phenomena.

As it has been demonstrated that instantaneous effects do occur regardless of the distance involved, the concept of instantaneous communication is suggestive of mind boggling possibilities.

Some might question the connection between instantaneous communication and gravity control, but the two are closely linked by the existence of an underlying dynamic force which permeates the universe.  In as much as non-linear time field frequency acceleration is the underlying force of energy determining the form and function of physical structure it is this same force which also sustains and perpetuates the existence of physical structure.  Plus this same force extends from one condition of universe to another in relation to the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

This means that regardless of how many and how variant the different conditions of universe might be they are all inter-connected by one dynamic force due to the non-absolute nature of those relative boundaries existing between the various conditions of universe.

Therefore it is possible for one’s thoughts to be communicated, not only to the extreme limits of universe, but to all other conditions of universe existing beyond that condition of universe which remains relative to our planet earth.

In relation to gravity control this suggests it possible to affect physical transport between the various conditions of universe, in that it should be possible to affect physical access to any condition of universe existing beyond the limitations of our existing field of view.

Historically we have referred to this process as instantaneous transformation, where a mass might be transported instantaneously from one place to another without having traveled linearly from here to there.

Gravity control offers the possibility of instantaneous transformation, as gravity control itself involves the controlled modulation of those field dynamics determining the form and function of field remaining relative to the system of reference.  In respect to gravity control a modular field system would be the system of reference employed as the access vehicle capable of instantaneous transformation.

Many have questioned the speed of gravity and wondered if the speed of gravity is the same as light speed or if it exceeds the speed of light, while some have considered the speed of gravity to be instantaneous, which would mean that gravity does not have a linear speed.

As it turns out this is quite true, as gravity does not have a speed.  Gravity itself does not move in a linear fashion as gravity is simply a dynamic response to the condition of field.  And as the underlying force determining the condition of field is itself non-linearly accelerating at a rate remaining relative to the system of reference gravity corresponds to the dynamic nature of field frequency acceleration.

Some have considered the existence of gravitons, in relation to gravity existing in the form of particles, but no such particles exist other than as an abstract idea.  In fact the term gravity could be dispensed with completely, as there is no actual force of gravity.  Gravity is simply an aspect of field dynamics, in relation to the non-linear acceleration of field frequency.

So how does simultaneous communication help us achieve gravity control?

In order to control gravity we must understand the true nature of gravity and the force responsible for the gravitational effects we observe.

For example; if an increase in energy focused to the center of the earth’s core causes a simultaneous response at the outer boundary of universe, the increase in energy is instantaneously registered at the outer boundary of universe, in terms of an inversely proportional instantaneous response.  In other words the condition of field remaining relative to the earth is simultaneously linked in all directions due to the instantaneous nature of the field dynamics involved.

Gravity decreases isometrically from the surface curve of the earth in inverse proportion to the square of the distance, which corresponds to an isometric decrease in the underlying energy of field being inversely proportional to the square of the distance in respect to our existing concept of space and motion.  But this concept is wholly inadequate for the purpose it is presently applied.

In other words there is no method by which to linearly traverse the vast distances of interstellar space, as both time and space are isometrically stretched to the point where we perceive an actual outer boundary of universe.

The only feasible method by which to traverse interstellar space is by means on instantaneous transformation.  And as difficult as it might sound it is not at all beyond our ability to master instantaneous transformation in a safe and efficient manner.

The first thing we must accept is the idea that all space is a dynamic response to the condition of field and nothing more.  Space is not a physical material per se, but a condition, a dynamic condition.

Yet, we assume we can measure space in a manner similar to measuring cloth, lumber, or a gas filled balloon.  This is a fantasy, as space does not conform to our perception of linear metric measure.

We wonder how a craft can go from 0 to thousands of miles per hour in the blink of an eye without subjecting the pilot to effects far beyond human endurance.  Its simple, gravity is not a force, but our existing aircraft employ a system of resistant propulsion, (resistance), and these other craft employ a non-resistant system which is not an actual system of propulsion, (resistance), at all.

The other craft, the UFO type craft, control the condition of field remaining relative to them as opposed to the condition of field controlling the reactions associated with conventional aerodynamics.

Our pilots are subject to the condition of field and have no control over the condition of field to which they are subject.  Therefore there are well defined limitations to the maneuverability and speed of their aircraft.

And when you consider manned missions in space, beyond the limits of orbiting satellites, rockets offer little advantage over conventional aircraft.

Certainly we have rocketed to the moon and mars and have landed equipment, but to putting people on the moon or mars is quite another matter.

To start with you must consider the non-uniform relationship existing between all field systems, such as that existing between the earth and moon or the earth and mars.  This is where gravity control comes into play, as gravity control allows for a uniform access to any field condition.

Without a system allowing for uniform access you cannot safely utilize any of the existing resources for the purpose of the mission, such as water etc.  In fact you cannot safely use the existing atmosphere or subject the crew to direct physical contact with the environment of the moon or mars.

The simultaneous nature of dynamic field responses also disqualifies the perception of space in terms of light years or astronomical units, as no such linear durations of time exist other than as an abstract invention of the human mind.  In other words, you cannot see for billions of years anymore than you can get too yesterday by walking backwards.  What you see is what there is to see at the moment you see it, not something which happened so many years ago and took that much time to reach you.

The human senses perceive the dynamic condition of field as it exists at the moment, not how it once existed or how it will exist, as we are confined to the field in which we presently exist.

Dynamic responses have nothing to do with linear terms of reference employed for the purpose of convenience by those involved in the various aspects of trade and commerce, as they are purely abstract values invented for a specific purpose.

The modulation of field is not magic, although it might appear that way to some.  The modulation of field is a natural process associated in varying degrees with every system of universe, which includes both the very small and the very big.

Therefore gravity control is a natural process, which simply mirrors the dynamic nature of universe.

Assuming gravity control to be impossible is no different than assuming that the earth is flat or that the earth is situated at the center of the solar system.

Project Unity, which is clearly described at http://www.gravitycontrol.org represents a basic magnetic frame by which it is possible to modulate the focus of field in any direction one might wish to travel.  This same system can also provide for instantaneous transformation to any condition of universe to which we might wish to be transported.

Simple yes, it is very simple, but the basic principles upon which this system is based take a bit of getting used to, as our conventional wisdom tends to obscure the simple nature of universe and Project Unity.

Instantaneous transformation is simply a matter of going beyond the limits of our existing state.  In other words the modulation of the underlying force alters the dynamics of field, whereby it is possible to experience instantaneous transport and simultaneous communication.

Velikovsky & Einstein Were Right

2006-10-01T22:38:00.000-07:00

It is commonly accepted that gravity and inertia are responsible for maintaining the orbits of the planets around the sun, in that gravity is perceived as a primary force of universe capable of allowing for the stability of this or any other solar system lasting for millions and billions of years.

It is only in recent years that the electromagnetic relationship existing between the sun and the planets has been acknowledged to exist, which has led to much speculation and experimentation in the area of electrogravitics.

Even so gravity itself still remains an enigma with many attempts being made to reconcile the relationship of gravity and electromagnetism.  So it seems somewhat strange that we should consider gravity to be a primary force of universe without yet knowing exactly what gravity is or understanding its relationship with electromagnetism.

To date no one can tell you why or how gravity holds the planets in orbit other than by describing a mathematical relationship associated with mass.

An argument is made for gravity and inertia maintaining orbital stability on the basis of astronomers calculating the motion of the planets against the background of the fixed stars with precise accuracy extending both backwards and forwards over periods of time.  But the accuracy of such extended precision cannot be confirmed or denied on the basis of calculations associated with gravity and inertia.

It must be understood that the extension of such calculations backwards and forwards in time is speculative at best, as there is no physical evidence to support such past and future events having occurred beyond the present era.

Only the confidence of astronomers in their existing standards of understanding allows for the acceptance of such speculation, even though such understanding is incomplete.

It is historically recorded that the planets and moons have not always followed their existing orbits and have on occasion altered their path of orbit and or crossed orbits involving near collisions resulting in cataclysmic events.

Velikovsky presented evidence to this effect in his book Worlds in Collision and those that followed, but for the most part his work was rejected by the scientific community.  Yet it would appear that Einstein took a sincere interest in Velikovsky’s work and agreed with much of the material presented.  http://www.varchive.org/itb/index.htm

It would appear that arguments demeaning the competency of historical recorders who claim to have witnessed the earth moved from its orbit during close encounters with both Venus and Mars are nothing more than an excuse for our inadequate understanding. It’s easier to simply dismiss the historical record on the basis of our own ignorance.

Realizing we live in a relatively primitive and barbaric world with little understanding of universe and little objectivity regarding the self imposed limitations we so guardedly adhere to, it should come as no great shock to discover that gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but simply a dynamic response.

If gravity is not itself a force of any kind it would be impossible for gravity to influence the orbit of the earth or the orbit of any other planetary body around the sun or the orbit of a satellite around a planet.

Therefore it would be equally impossible for gravity and inertia to determine the stability of planetary orbits, as orbital stability is simply the physical manifestation of a dynamic response corresponding to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

If we consider the condition of field to be determined on the basis of a dynamic underlying force of energy we will realize that a differential in this energy exists between all systems in motion.

And in that this underlying force is its self dynamic in nature, the differential in underlying energy existing between all systems in motion must be continuously changing.  This would suggest that the stability of planetary orbits is limited to a certain degree of dynamic variance existing between the systems involved.

Taking this one step further we might also consider that the stability of the earth in orbit around the sun, in the company of so many neighboring planets, could not be expected to be maintained for more than a limited duration due to the complexity and variance of the dynamics involved.

At the present time we are concerned with the problem of global warming, which we prefer to attribute to human industry.  Yet we are aware of neighboring planets experiencing increased warming without the aid of human industry.

Consequently many scientists deny the possibility of the sun being responsible for global warming, while attempting to convince the population they are collectively responsible for the problem and its remedy.  This allows political opportunities to be created on the basis of personal resolve to control the situation in a timely manner.

If it were not for a differential in the underlying energy of the sun and the earth there would be no earth/sun system.  Furthermore, it is the degree of differential which determines the warming effect of the sun upon the earth and the greater the differential the greater the warming effect.

To suggest that the sun is not responsible for global warming is akin to saying an unattended campfire or a bolt of lightening could not be responsible for a forest fire, as the resulting forest fire was due solely to the tinder dry conditions of the forest, in which case we might prevent forest fires by cutting down more trees.

If all human industry were to cease immediately we would still be subjected to the effects of global warming, as global warming is the natural result of an increasing differential in the underlying energy of the sun and the earth.  Global warming is a base level response to a disproportionate increase in the sun’s dynamic energy potential relative to that of the earth.

Therefore we can anticipate global warming to increase until the earth’s orbit shifts.

Gravity does not hold the earth in orbit around the sun and the earth cannot maintain a stable relationship with the sun forever, as the cyclical nature of the solar dynamics are solely dependent on the relative relationship of those underlying forces of energy involved.

The earth is held in orbit around the sun by means of a differential in non-linear dynamics associated with an underlying force of energy which is inherently responsible for the continuous existence of physical structure and the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

Therefore an accelerative increase in the existing energy differential between the earth and the sun will cause an ever increasing accelerative variance to grow.  This means we cannot avoid the future, as it is determined on the basis of a dynamic force of energy and not personal bias.

The Nature of Energy

2006-09-25T20:49:00.000-07:00

There seems to be some confusion in respect to our perception of energy and its relationship to mass.

I was recently informed that the ratio of energy per unit of mass was the same for all materials.  But what makes this interesting is the fact that the informant was a well known scientist involved with the new accelerator under construction in Europe.

I know that this man is not stupid, in fact he is extremely bright, but he does insist that the ratio of energy per unit of mass is the same for all materials, as only the mass of a material determines its energy potential.  In other words E=MC2 is valid for all materials, regardless of whether it is hydrogen or uranium, in relation to an equal mass of each element having an equal energy potential.  Both masses would have an equal ratio of energy per unit of mass, which leaves a single hydrogen atom with a very low ratio of energy per unit of mass.

So why would anyone think that the ratio of energy per unit of mass would be different for each and every element appearing on the periodic table?

It depends on what you define as energy, in relation to the question; exactly what is energy?

Is energy the product of a fuel which is consumed or altered in order to do work and or perform some function?  Do we derive energy from coal, wood, gas, sugar, starch etc?

Of course all materials have energy, but is it possible to extract that energy as an actual force of energy?

In order for this to be possible requires that energy radiate or be made to radiate, whereby energy would be considered to a resistant force.  An increase in energy would affect an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.  The key words are; an increase in resistance.

How could an increase in resistance be associated with an increase in energy, as this would suggest that there should not be any available energy to do work or perform functions?

It is commonly accepted that a force of energy is required and or applied in order to move an otherwise stationary object, such as a bowling ball or a train.  This means that the application of energy is very definitely limited and or determined by the mass of the object to be moved.

This would mean that energy was limited to linear applications, in that a certain quantity of energy must be applied to move a train a certain distance at a certain speed.  And if coal or diesel fuel is used to operate the train, the operation of the train is limited to the supply of fuel.

It is also commonly accepted that the mass of the train increases as it accelerates, which means that the energy of the train itself is increasing in proportion to an increase in mass.  But is this true?

How can there be an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy associated with an actual increase in energy proportional to an increase in mass?

Is mass proportional to energy and is energy proportional to mass?

In a general sense you could say that the larger mass of a specific material has the greater energy, but that is where it ends.

Take a simple hydrogen atom and ask yourself what it is which sustains and perpetuates the existence of the hydrogen atom?  The answer of course is energy, but what exactly is this energy that allows the hydrogen atom to exist and continue existing?

Most would jump in with, atomic energy, or something similar, but what exactly is atomic energy and has anyone ever clearly defined its existence?

The answer is no.  No one has clearly defined the existence of atomic energy, with the key word being energy.

They have clearly shown that there is a factor of resistance associated with the structure of atoms, which allows for nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons etc.  But at no time has anyone accessed the energy of an atom for any purpose.

How could the energy of an atom be accessed by fission or by fusion?  It isn’t and it can’t be done.

We have made an error, as we have mistakenly accepted a false assumption of fact in respect to the idea that energy remains proportional to mass regardless of the material involved.

We assume that more mass always equals more energy without further qualification, when in fact the smaller mass always has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass, which allows the hydrogen atom to have the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass for any known element.

Why?  Because if energy was in fact resistant atomic elements would not last more than a fraction of a second before folding on themselves and vanishing from sight.

In order to sustain the structural dynamics of any atomic structure requires a continuous supply of energy which is steadily increasing.  And the reason why the energy supply must be steadily increasing is because the dynamics of any physical structure are determined on the basis of a dynamic differential in energy and resistance with the energy focused symmetrically to the center of field and resistance isometrically radiating from the center of field.

From this we can see that mass remains proportional to resistance and not energy, always.

If energy is focused to the center of field it would appear impossible for it to radiate, as energy, the underlying force of universe, is a non-resistant force, where an increase in energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy.

Oh but, what about fission, doesn’t this process access this underlying energy?  No, all it does is extend the external dynamics and increase the factor of resistance.  You cannot access the internal portion of field from the external portion of field; all you can do is extend the external portion.

You could strip an atom into its subatomic components and still not access the underlying energy of field, as the energy is focused inward and not outward, it refuses to radiate.

The only way energy can be made to radiate requires the underlying dynamics be reversed, which would result in some very unpleasant effects.

In that the greater mass is more resistant to the underlying dynamics of universe, the greater mass of a particular material has a lower dynamic ratio of energy per unit of mass than a smaller mass of the same material.

So is it any wonder that our perception of energy is based on the consumption of mass.  And the faster we consume mass the more energy we generate.

Generally speaking our perception of energy is associated with a destructive process, where we assume that by destroying this we can create that.  Such as burning coal or gas to provide heat etc.

If energy was a destructive force it would not be capable of creating or allowing for the processes of life or for the construction of physical materials.

Energy in the truest sense provides for a differential in energy associated with the dynamics of physical structure, in relation to the various forms and functions involved.

Energy is directly associated with an underlying force which can only be quantified in terms of a relative non-linear relationship.

If energy was in fact proportional to mass, how would we describe the process determining the inherent characteristics of each atomic element other than as a mechanical arrangement involving interchangeable parts constituting units of energy remaining proportional to their mass.

The high energy requirements of mass less particles said to be traveling close to the speed of light is due to their mass less character, yet a mass less particle should have no energy and of course no resistance either.  But nonetheless mass less particles are considered to be a part of our universe, despite the fact that it would be impossible to impart resistant energy into and or to a mass less particle.

The inherent characteristics of each atomic element are determined by a unique ratio of energy per unit of mass, in relation to a specific ratio of energy to mass determining the specific form and function of each element.

If the underlying force of energy can be modulated in a controlled manner, whereby affecting the dynamics of physical structure, it should be possible to not only alter the space and motion remaining relative to each system of reference, but change the inherent characteristics of any known element in order to compensate for a shortage of another element.

We can increase and or decrease the energy of any system, but we cannot achieve direct access to the internal energy involved.   But what we can do is employ the underlying differential in energy and resistance to fuel our human industry.

Engineering UFO Craft of Extraterrestrial Origin

2006-09-03T18:26:00.000-07:00

In past posts and articles I have written on the subject of Back Engineering UFO Type Craft, with one such article posted on Peswiki.

Despite decades of denial and debunking it is fair to say that the military/industrial complex has done a fair job of keeping the existence of UFO and ET within the realm of science fiction.

If the military do have extraterrestrial artifacts it would appear they are, at the very least, having a tough time trying to back engineer the technology involved and an even tougher time attempting to understand the required science.

It would appear that the military might have maneuvered themselves into a catch 22 situation, as in order to keep their secret things secret they cannot openly seek out solutions to very difficult problems associated with extraterrestrial science and technology.

The biggest snag is the fact that secrets themselves are problematic and the greater the complexity of the secrets the more problematic they become, especially after decades of deception associated with secret research and development.

If the science is the real problem, which I think it is, it could be many more decades before the applicable solutions are finally realized, unless of course someone comes up with the answers in the meantime.

Here at Gravity Control we are attempting to present an alternative view concerning the dynamics of non-linear drive in the form of a field frequency modulator.  It’s a simple idea, but not one that is easily grasped without a certain degree of openness or a willingness to consider alternative explanations for the existing conditions of universe.

No one with any degree of comprehension and or understanding is going to attempt interstellar transport with anything less than a non-linear drive system capable of instantaneous transformation, which puts the military establishment at a bit of a disadvantage in attempting to achieve such a goal or duplicate extraterrestrial science and technology.

The first problem with the science is coming to terms with the concept of a universe which not only exists as a non-simultaneous condition remaining relative to the system of reference but also exists in a dynamic state, whereby an underlying force of energy sustains and perpetuates the existence of this condition.

To appreciate the situation we only have to consider the fact that a nuclear reactor is presently considered efficiently suitable for the purpose of heating water.  And in this respect the heavy elements constituting the nuclear fuel are thought to provide a source of energy proportional to their mass.

The science involved appears logical enough until you attempt to understand what it is which prevents the universe from collapsing on itself.

For a long time it was thought that the universe was running down, which allowed for the idea that the expansion of universe was slowing, whereby it would eventually stop expanding and start contracting.  But as we have discovered this is not the case, as the rate of expansion is accelerating.

This has led to the idea of dark matter and dark energy, without anyone being quite sure what either is.

On top of this we have found background radiation, which is believed to be left over from the big bang.

If the universe is acceleratively expanding, the relative rate of expansion must be proportional to an increasing source of energy capable of sustaining the accelerative expansion.  Therefore the supply of energy must also be accelerating.

This would indicate that the universe is dynamically structured, whereby the basic elements of universe must also be dynamically structured.

We presently consider atomic elements to be running down or decaying in that they are thought to lose energy in proportion to a decrease in mass, but if they are not running down but are in fact being sustained and perpetuated by a steady increase in energy our existing perception of the situation must be in error.

If there is an underlying source of energy sustaining and perpetuating physical structure we can be quite sure we do not yet know exactly what energy is, because if we did we would have already developed a non-linear drive system capable of providing for instantaneous transformation.

Yet our human logic prevents us from moving forward, as we appear trapped in our own thoughts concerning the nature of energy.  We evaluate energy as corresponding to a proportional quantity of mass, where more mass provides more energy.  Of course this is in part true, but in a very general sense.  If an underlying source of energy provides the smaller mass with a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass we might consider our existing perception to be self defeating.

If such an underlying force does exist we might realize that our ideas about strong and weak forces could also be in error, as such forces might be better described as dynamic responses to an underlying force.

Therefore the control of these strong and weak forces should be possible through the controlled modulation of the underlying force, an idea which is readily apparent in nature.  Yet we insist that this is not possible and that no such underlying controlling force exists.

It would appear that the existence of UFO type craft and ET’s prevents us from admitting to such a possibility, as to do so would be viewed as letting the cat out of the bag.  Without such secrets in the form of secret knowledge no one nation or any one person could hope to have control over the rest of the world.

The controlled manipulation of the world’s economy for the purpose of the few would no longer be possible if a source of unlimited energy were available to everyone in an equal manner.  The world’s economy would no longer be based on a restricted supply of energy and raw resources, but on the various purposes to which this new source of energy would be applied.

In light of UFO type craft and ET’s the human race could no longer be considered the only intelligent species in the universe, which would mean that our human activities would be subject to a higher authority than that existing on this earth at the present time.

When you take such ideas into consideration it is not that difficult to understand why and how the existence of UFO type craft and ET’s have remained hidden from public view for so long.

How could the leader of any nation openly admit to the criminal atrocities having been committed for the purpose of hiding the truth from their people?  Such criminal activities cannot be justified in a free and democratic society where each and every citizen is equally subject to the laws and regulations to which they have agreed to abide.

Is it possible for any national administration to come clean and let us in on the truth of this matter or will the truth remain hidden and continue to be protected by whatever means deemed necessary?

If it is the latter, it is not for the purpose of maintaining national security, but for the purpose of hiding the fact that the security of our nation cannot be protected against the influence of extraterrestrial intelligence.

The Expanding Planet

2006-08-16T01:13:00.000-07:00

It is considered by many that our planet is slowly expanding with the rate of expansion accelerating over time, an idea with which I agree.  But many of these same people also make the assumption that an increase in the size of the earth will increase the planet’s gravity, an idea with which I disagree.

Gravity is proportional to the ratio of energy per unit of mass and not proportional to mass alone.

It is also thought that it is the compression of gravity acting upon the earth’s core which is responsible for the expansion, but this is not the case as there is virtually no gravity acting upon the earth’s core.

The dynamic structure of our planet is governed by the underlying force, non-linear time field frequency acceleration, which affects both the internal and external dynamics of our planet in an inverse manner.  Therefore gravity does not increase to the core, but increases isometrically from the center of the earth to the surface curve, while gravity increases symmetrically from the depths of space to the surface curve.  So there is insufficient gravity at the core to affect any degree of compression.

The earth’s greatest gravity is across the surface curve, but because the surface of the earth is not perfectly flat there are fluctuations in gravity with altitude above and below sea level.

Gravity is higher at the tops of mountains situated above sea level and higher over deep ocean basins and trenches.  The inside of a mountain is a vertical extension of the earth’s internal dynamics, while a deep depression or trench is a vertical extension of the earth’s external dynamics.

This provides a differential in gravity at various locations where unequal but proportional pressure is applied from above and below the earth’s surface, which in turn stresses the structure of the earth’s crust.

And as the planet is acceleratively expanding in proportion to an accelerating increase in energy affecting the ratio of energy per unit of mass, it can be expected that all matter constituting the structure of the earth should be affected proportionally.  This means that even at the micro level expansion will be experienced.

Therefore a decrease in gravity will not provide for a stable and unchanging condition, as the rate of expansion is constantly increasing simply because it is driven by a dynamic force.

It is a differential in gravity associated with vertical extremes of high and low points across the surface curve which provides the stress associated with sudden tectonic movements and upheavals, in combination with a gradual decline in gravity associated with the process of expansion.

This picture is further compounded by non-uniform distortions originating from the sun, moon and our neighboring planets, in respect to every system of universe sharing a non-uniform relationship.

A very complex picture indeed, which indicates that an increase in non-uniform distortions can be anticipated to dramatically affect the stability of our planet, especially the surface crust.

The surface crust of the earth is the location where the greatest factor of resistance is applied, which not only causes tectonic movement but also affects an increase in the temperature of the crust, with the greatest resistance located at the equator.

It should also be noted that the basic dynamics of the earth’s structure also affect atmospheric conditions.  Therefore extremes in the weather can be expected to increase over time, keeping in mind that the process is accelerative.

Field Acceleration

2006-07-30T18:42:00.000-07:00

Field acceleration, non-linear time field frequency acceleration, is essential to the function of any process, as without some degree of non-linear acceleration the field structure would collapse.

Simply put, nothing happens unless there is an element of acceleration present, as it is the rate of acceleration which drives field dynamics, in relation to those dynamic responses allowing for the form and function of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

In this light a low rate of non-linear time field frequency affects a relative increase in both gravity and electromagnetism, as both gravity and electromagnetism are simply dynamic responses to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

A high rate of non-linear time field frequency affects a relative decrease in both gravity and electromagnetism for the same reason.

As non-linear time field frequency acceleration can be modulated in a controlled manner it is possible to regulate the rate of acceleration affecting the form and function of physical structure, whereby a decrease in non-linear time field frequency acceleration can be considered to have a negative effect.  In contrast to this an increase in non-linear time field frequency acceleration can be considered to have a positive effect, as long as the modulation produces a uniform field effect.

Without the factor of uniformity being considered a non-uniform fluctuation in non-linear time field frequency acceleration, whether high or low, will cause distortions to affect the uniform continuance of field, which has been shown to produce genetic deformities and cancerous anomalies in both plants and animals.

Therefore the application of indiscriminate electromagnetic radiation must be considered to represent a serious threat to health and safety, as extremely high and low levels of EM pollution can be consider to represent non-uniform potentials.

EM pollution is a product of resistance, in relation to relative differentials in non-linear time field frequency acceleration affecting a factor of resistance.  And the greater the differential the greater is the degree of resistance affecting the uniform continuance of non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

Of course there is much debate over this issue, but if public health and safety were the prime considerations involved in the regulation of EM pollution the debate would be over and many corporations would be looking for more environmentally friendly means by which to generate income.

For example; high voltage transmission lines and cell towers would not be permitted to be located anywhere close to human habitation or agricultural land reserves.

I have previously covered the factor of non-uniformity existing between all relative unified field systems of universe and the ill effects resulting from direct exposure to non-uniform potentials, such as the environment of an extraterrestrial planetary body, but to date such considerations are firmly denied.

In order to counter this irresponsible stance there must be some effort made to study and document the basic dynamics of field, in relation to the further consideration being given to the non-linear parameters governing the form and function of physical structure.  And to this end it would be beneficial to construct a modular field system similar to that of Project Unity described on www.gravitycontrol.org

Only through further research and development can Project Unity provide the understanding and insight so necessary, not only for our survival, but for the exploration and colonization of space.

Atoms In Motion

2006-07-24T00:22:00.000-07:00

The underlying energy of every system is focused to the center of field, as the dynamics of each and every system are determined on the basis of a unified field of frequency, which is continuously accelerating to the center of field in a relatively uniform manner.

In this context every system maintains a non-uniform relationship with every other system, whereby the dynamics of every system are affected by factors of field distortion associated with the non-uniformity existing between each and every system. The factor of non-uniformity is determined on the basis of relative differentials in the underlying energy existing between each and every system.

The rate of field frequency acceleration is different for every system, in that the rate of field frequency acceleration is accelerating at different rates focused to the center of each field.

Every atom constituting the structure of the earth maintains a non-uniform relationship with every other atom constituting the structure of the earth, while being restricted to the uniform field of planet earth.

It is this arrangement which allows for the cyclical relationship of all systems, both big and small, as there is a limitation to the extremities of dynamic differentials in terms of balanced stability.

Therefore the underlying dynamics of those atoms constituting one system are not in sync with the underlying dynamics of those atoms constituting another system, such as the moon, sun or mars etc, as there is a differential in field dynamics existing between each and every system of universe.

Life forms on planet earth are subject to the field dynamics of planet earth, as all life forms on planet earth are subject to the relatively uniform acceleration of the earth’s field, in relation to a unified field of frequency.

This situation isolates all of those life forms existing on and or in planet earth from the field dynamics of every other system, as the affects of field distortion from other systems is limited to those non-uniform distortions associated with differentials in the underlying energy potentials involved, such as those differentials between the earth and the sun, the earth and the moon or the earth and mars etc.

As the dynamic differentials existing between systems increase so do the degrees of non-uniformity also increase, whereby the distortional effects of non-uniformity increase proportionately?

For life forms existing on one system to be transferred directly to another system, without protective isolation preventing ill effects, requires inter field access where a uniform balance in dynamic potential can be achieved.

This in itself requires the ability to modulate the underlying dynamics of one system to match those of another system in a controlled manner, which is no small achievement, whether the modulated system is of an artificial nature or not.

In relation to atomic structures constituting any system, it is the factor of non-uniformity existing between all atomic structures which allows for changes and alterations in the context of dynamic interactions.

Without this factor of non-uniformity nothing would change or alter over time, whereby the existence and or development of any and or all life forms would simply not be possible.

In relation to the transmutation of atomic elements existing within life forms, such transmutation is due to the various non-uniform relationships existing between those atomic structures involved, as each atomic structure is attempting to maintain a relative balance, in terms of those differentials in dynamic potential associated with atomic structures constituting organic molecules.

If the transmutation of atomic elements occurring naturally within life forms was not possible, the survival of many life forms would not be successful, as a continuous supply of the required elements in quantities delivered at the exact time required is essential for survival, but not always readily available by any means other than transmutation.

It is the factor of non-uniformity which allows transmutation to occur, as transmutation within the various life forms is due to distortional effects associated with non-uniformity existing between different atomic structures.

A similar situation exists between planets, moons and stars etc. as the differentials in dynamic potential, which refers to the underlying energy differentials existing between each system, are continuously increasing due to the fact that the acceleration of the underlying energy of each system, focused to the center of field, is accelerating at different rates.

Therefore it should be possible to understand why plants and animals subjected to the effects of lunar materials returned to earth would cause accelerated growth, genetic deformities and cancerous growths.

The lunar material is simply out of sync with the field of the earth, whereby the distortional effects of the lunar material become extremely extenuated to the point of causing dysfunctional abnormalities.

The same would be true for seeds transported from earth to the moon or mars and planted in lunar or Martian soil, as the development of the seeds would be extremely distorted by the factors of non-uniformity present.

Therefore non-uniformity has a very real purpose, which cannot be dispensed with. Non-uniformity is essential to the various processes contributing to life in all its varied forms.

Missing Evidence

2006-07-14T16:32:00.000-07:00

When the first lunar samples were returned to Earth a battery of tests were performed to determine if the material represented a threat to our terrestrial ecology.

As it turned out, the lunar material did not carry any extraterrestrial baggage in the form of bacteria and or virus, but some of the tests indicated that the lunar material produced some very peculiar effects.

In 71 I received a brochure from NASA in response to my interest in the moon rocks, as I had speculated that the lunar environment would produce accelerated growth in plants.

This brochure included text and photos of the tested plants, but is no longer listed in NASA's catalog.

The lunar material was pulverized to a fine powder and placed in solution with water.
This solution was then poured directly onto soil in which both corn and beans had been planted.

This resulted in accelerated growth, genetic deformities and cancerous growths.

At the time no one knew what to make of the situation as there was no explanation for these radical results.

It is important to note that the brochure specifically stated that the lunar material was not radioactive beyond normal background levels.

This same experiment was shown on public television during a special presentation authorized and or approved by NASA.

Now, years later there is no reference to this original testing or the radical effects that were so well documented. In fact NASA now clearly denies that any such radical effects occurred.

NASA Archives claim the lunar material affected accelerated growth in plants, but that no structural alterations or ill effects of any kind occurred.

Also, it has been noted that the Apollo astronauts inhaled lunar dust during their return trip to Earth, but suffered no ill effects other than a slight case of hay fever.

Something is wrong here, as the original test results indicated a lack of understanding concerning differences in the basic dynamics of those materials constituting the structure of individual planetary bodies.

Obviously this would indicate an element of danger, in relation to the health and safety of crew members, in attempting to establish a base on the moon or colonize another planetary body.

The mere fact that the Apollo astronauts suffered no ill effects from the ingestion of the lunar material, by means of inhalation, while a variety of plant and animal species did, demands some explanation, as it makes no sense whatsoever.

It was only decades after the fact that I discovered that the original test results have been deleted and are now denied to have occurred.

As I am not the only person to have viewed these original test results, but one of the few people to have maintained a continuing and lasting interest in this issue, it would appear that we have a serious problem.

Certainly NASA represents the authority figure in this situation and many other tests have been conducted since, where no adverse effects have been reported.

The question is why would NASA not only deny the original test results having occurred, but remove all material relating to these original tests from public view? But this restriction is not limited to the general public, but includes present day scientists working within the space program.

Such structural alterations and ill effects indicated that some new science and technology was required, yet the space program continued without even feeling a bump in the road and without further consideration to the structural alterations and ill effects demonstrated under strict laboratory controls.

Obviously this should have slowed or curtailed the general thrust of the space program, but no such slowing or curtailment occurred, as it was and has been business as usual.

Today there is talk of utilizing water which might or might not exist on the moon and or mars for the purpose of human consumption during future manned missions.

If the original test results are valid the use of lunar or martian water would put the mission crew members at risk, in relation to their health and safety.

The occurrence and deletion of these early tests creates many questions, which for the time being must remain unanswered. But it would not be possible for the astronauts of the Apollo missions to have inhaled the same material to which a variety of plants and animals were subjected without themselves suffering ill effects, if the lunar material caused accelerated growth, genetic deformities and cancerous growths in species of plants and animals.

Anyone with information pertaining to this matter is urged to send us an email or post a comment, thanks.

One Single Force

2006-06-13T23:09:00.000-07:00

Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa), opens doors that have remained closed for far too long.

Every aspect of universe is governed by (ntffa), in that (ntffa) represents the single underlying force of energy determining the form and function of all physical structure.  There are no strong or weak forces, just one single force affecting the dynamic responses of universe.

Regardless of the situation, each and every situation or circumstance is governed by the dynamics of field as determined by (ntffa).

Variations in the underlying force of energy determines the properties of atomic structure, as the basic difference between the various elements is their underlying energy potential, in terms of a ratio of energy per unit of mass.

The orbits of the planets are determined on the basis of dynamic differentials in (ntffa) and not gravity, as gravity is simply a dynamic response to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

Similarly electromagnetism is also a dynamic response to the condition of field.

Both gravity and electromagnetism are dynamic responses to a differential in (ntffa) and the greater the differential the greater the dynamic response.

In terms of uniform and non-uniform relations, every system of universe maintains a non-uniform relationship with every other system of universe, while each system of universe exists as a uniform field of frequency unto itself.

Therefore the total energy potential of any system corresponds to a unified field of frequency, in that the total energy of any system is the total energy of universe remaining relative to that system of reference.

If we were to build an aerospace system, in the form of a modular field system, capable of modulating the underlying dynamic force of energy in a controlled manner, the power drive of the craft would be capable of utilizing the total underlying dynamic energy of universe remaining relative to the modular field system.

As any unified field system is based on the focus of (ntffa) to the center of field, the controlled modulation of a modular field system would be achieved by the manipulation of field focus.

It is commonly thought that any propellantless or field propulsion system will be constrained by the law; conservation of momentum, the center of mass-energy (CM) of any initially stationary isolated system cannot change its position unless acted upon by outside forces, but this is not so.

The controlled modulation of the underlying force of energy focuses the unified field of frequency acceleratively to the center of field, whereby the underlying energy of field does not radiate.  Therefore the force acting upon the craft or system remains internally isolated from the external portion of field.  No outside forces are required or necessary for the craft or system to change its position relative to other systems of universe.

What is important here is the non-linear underlying element of description as we are not talking about push or pull or even a resistant force, as (ntffa) is a non-resistant force in relation to an increase in (ntffa) affecting a decrease in resistance to a further increase in (ntffa).

Here at www.gravitycontrol.org we are dedicated to the challenge of applying (ntffa) for the benefit of all people, in respect to the needs of their human industry.

Unity (the book)

2006-05-21T21:55:00.000-07:00

There are now 4 (four) sample chapters of the book Unity posted on www.gravitycontrol.org

To read these sample chapters or down load them to your computer go to;Project Unity book

Research & Development

2006-04-30T18:45:00.000-07:00

If the plan is to colonize distant planetary bodies and or exploit the natural resources of space, we have a problem.

Back in the 60s our collective ambition was to land a man on the moon, with a promise of bigger and better things to come.  And although we landed several men on the moon and recovered lunar geological samples we have long since failed to duplicate this achievement or make any real effort to do so.

What happened and why do we remain hesitant to return to the moon intent on establishing a permanent base?

The Apollo Missions provided an exciting time for all involved and public interest in space was at its peak.

I remember the first lunar samples returned to earth and the stir of excitement they created.  Everyone was watching as initial experiments were conducted to ensure that the lunar material did not represent a threat to our terrestrial ecology.

A number of plant and animal species were subjected to and or injected with lunar material and the results carefully noted.  One particular test, which was widely publicized, including television coverage, involved two species of plants.

Two horticultural plots were planted with bean and corn and watered with a solution containing pulverized lunar material.  The result was a radical increase in the rate of growth, genetic deformities and cancerous anomalies, despite the fact that no radioactivity was detected beyond normal background levels.

Everyone involved was completely baffled by these test results and no explanation was forthcoming or even available at the time.  It was a complete mystery, but nonetheless an important part of the adventure.

I had speculated that the lunar material would effect accelerated growth in plants, but I was ill prepared for the radical effects of the lunar material.

At the time it was generally accepted that the moon maintained a uniform relationship with the earth, in the sense that going to the moon involved nothing more than traveling a long distance in space.  In other words the only thing separating the earth and the moon was thought to be space.

Although I did not have the answers at the time I made up my mind to find an explanation for these adverse affects.

Consequently, years later I was confident that I had found a solution, but to my shock and horror I discovered that these initial test results had been altered and in some respects deleted from history.  At first it seemed incomprehensible that NASA would or could simply delete the record concerning unfavorable test results, but that is exactly what they did do.

These test results although somewhat limited in scope were critical in advancing our understanding of space science and technology, as they indicated very pointedly that we lacked the ability to access the uniform condition of any other planetary body.

Rockets were and are inadequate and could and cannot under any circumstances allow us to access the uniform condition of the moon or safely utilize the natural resources of space.

This brings us to the point of contention, as it was political will which got us to the moon, an achievement generally regarded as a huge success.  Therefore it would not have been viewed politically prudent to announce that the effort had been nothing more than an initial experiment allowing us to move forward to even more advanced research and development.

On top of this we had military intelligence to consider, as we were in the middle of a very hot cold war where failure was not an option.

Today the cold war is long over, but still no one is willing to correct or even admit to having erred in the decision to hide critical scientific data.  Consequently we continue to pour billions of dollars into a space program which cannot succeed if our goal is to colonize another planetary body.

If the agenda is to simply gain scientific knowledge of other planets and moons robotics can do the job, but if our ambition is to one day colonize another planetary body we are simply spinning our wheels.

NASA has even suggested that lunar materials might represent a benefit to terrestrial farmers, as they do admit that the lunar material did in fact affect accelerated growth in plants, while claiming that no adverse effects or structural alterations occurred in respect to the various plant and animal species subjected to and or injected with the lunar material.

If we were to take NASA at their word and did bring lunar materials back to earth for the purpose of commercial horticulture we would be faced with a disaster.  The lunar material would pollute the soil in a manner whereby crops intended for human and or animal consumption could no longer be safely grown.

There is currently a plan to utilize Martian water for the purpose of a manned mission to mars, should such a mission actually occur.  The ingestion of this water would represent a serious health hazard to the mission crew, as despite its apparent or real purity it would represent a non-uniform potential just as the lunar material represents a non-uniform potential.  Martian water would seriously jeopardize the health and safety of the crew, whereby they could be incapacitated or even die from such adverse and damaging effects.

Even in the area of interplanetary and interstellar communications we are lacking in our ability and or willingness to address issues concerning the non-uniform relationship existing between our planet and all other bodies in space.

New and innovative science and technology must be developed if we are to achieve our goals in space, which is what we at gravitycontrol.org continue to emphasize.

Much of the material we offer on gravitycontrol.org and gravitycontrolidealism is new and perhaps somewhat foreign to many readers, but given half a chance these revolutionary concepts will allow for a clear and comprehensive understanding of our relative relationship with universe, in relation to redefining existing evidence and clues.

The future is waiting to be discovered and the future is now.

© 2006 David Barclay

Internal & External Dynamics

2006-04-28T22:35:00.000-07:00

To date we do not consider the dynamics of physical structure in terms of internal and external dynamics.  We simply consider the dynamics of physical structure in terms of a three dimensional format.

In relation to the dynamics of our planet earth, it is quite amazing that we do not or have not considered the internal dynamics being inversely proportional to the external dynamics, in the context of a balanced field structure.

The consequence of this would seem to be obvious, in that we assume the internal dynamics to be an extension of the external dynamics.  Therefore it is possible to consider gravity increasing to the center of the earth’s core simply because gravity increases toward or in the direction of the earth’s interior on the outside.

No one has ventured into or found a method by which to access the earth’s interior structure, as the inside is always on the inside and never exposed to the outside.

And regardless of how we poke and prod the earth it is impossible to access the internal portion of the earth’s structure, as any such attempt in the form of a hole merely extends the external dynamics inward without accessing the internal dynamics.

The underlying energy of the earth’s field does in fact accelerate to the center of the earth’s core, but the internal and external dynamic responses to the underlying energy potential remain inversely proportional.  Otherwise the earth would tend to fold on itself, which it does not do.

In fact the earth appears to be expanding, which would be attributed to the continuous increase in the acceleration of the underlying force of energy affecting the structural dynamics of the earth.

And in as much as the universe, the non-simultaneous condition of universe remaining relative to the earth, is acceleratively expanding, it would seem reasonable to consider the expansion of the earth remaining proportional to the expansion of universe in relation to the relative space, time and motion involved.

Without considering the internal and external dynamics remaining inversely proportional we are looking at the world with one blind eye.

If the internal and external dynamics of the sun are inversely proportional this would give us a completely different view of the sun’s structural dynamics.

We would be forced to reconsider the idea of the sun being driven by a process of nuclear fusion, as this requires the interior of the sun to be extremely hot.  On the basis of inverse dynamics, the core of the sun should be extremely cold.

The problem as I see it is that we do not appear to understand the basics of a relative condition, which may be why we are still searching for a simple unified field theory.

The earth itself exists as a unified field system, whereby the universe existing relative to the earth is a condition corresponding to the field of the earth.  Therefore the universe existing relative to the earth is a relative condition of field remaining relative to the earth as the system of reference.

In a similar manner there is a condition of universe remaining relative to the sun, where there is a condition of field remaining relative to the sun as the system of reference.

If this is true for planets, stars and moons it must also be true for atoms, as there must be a condition of field remaining relative to each atom, in relation to an atom being a system of reference.

Therefore each atom has both internal and external dynamics which remain inversely proportional,

This gives us a completely revised view of atomic structure, as well as a revised view of bodies in space.

The control of gravity will only come after we view physical structure as being the result of inversely proportional internal and external dynamic responses, whereby physical structure is a dynamic response to an underlying force of energy.

The whole idea of gravity control is to affect the inversely proportional dynamics of a field system by modulating the underlying force of energy focused to the center of the systems field.

If you can modulate the underlying energy of a system you must also affect the dynamic responses associated with that system, which includes gravity.

Energy Defined

2006-04-19T00:29:00.000-07:00

E=MC2 is a one size fits all type of statement, but energy does not comply with the demands of the statement.

It is assumed that an increase in mass affects an increase in energy, which is true in a very general sense, but untrue in a specific sense.

In order for this famous equation to stand the test of time, energy must be equally proportional for all substances.  In other words, a certain mass of hydrogen must possess the same quantity of energy as an equal mass of uranium.

No allowance is made for an underlying force of energy, as E=MC2 associates energy with mass in terms of a resistant force.

When we talk about an underlying force of energy, such as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, as described in the June 05 post entitled “The Energy”, we are talking about a dynamic force capable of sustaining the form and function of all physical structure.

In respect to atomic elements it is apparent that their form and function is characteristic of their physical identity.

Each element on the periodic table has a different mass, whereby we assume the more massive elements to possess greater energy, which is true in a very general sense.

In this respect we assumed that energy radiates isometrically from within each element.

In the case of the hydrogen atom and the uranium atom, the uranium atom has the greater mass/energy, but the hydrogen atom has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass in terms of an underlying force of energy.

Each atomic element has a certain ratio of energy per unit of mass, with hydrogen having the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass of any known element.

Also, if we have two unequal masses of the same element, the smaller or lesser of the two masses will have the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.  This means that the smaller portion of any given substance has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.

As the mass of any similar substance increases, the ratio of energy per unit of mass decreases proportionally.

If we have two equal portions of a similar substance, the two equal portions will have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than if they were combined as one single mass.

In relation to atomic structure the underlying energy is always focused to the center of field and does not radiate under any circumstances, in that the underlying energy is non-resistant.  Therefore, an increase in the underlying energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, while a decrease in the underlying energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

If we break a given substance into many pieces we have not accessed its internal energy.  Even if we break an atoms nucleus we have not accessed its internal energy, but have in fact increased the ratio of energy per unit of mass associated with the broken pieces.  No energy is released, as the energy remains focused to the center of field.

Energy in terms of a non-resistant force of energy allows for a greater understanding of energy in providing for the form and function of physical structure.

© 2006 David Barclay

Blinded by the Light

2006-04-09T17:43:00.000-07:00

Light speed and the constancy of light speed is a touchy subject with many, but it is the one factor which holds us in limbo and denies future progress.

Our existing perception is that light travels in a linear manner much like a car, train or bus........traveling at a constant 299,792,458 meters per second on the basis of light traveling one meter in 1/299,792,458ths of a second.

The speed of light is artificially fixed to avoid confusion created by its fluctuating rate. So, the idea that light speed is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second and remains constant for millions and billions of years is only valid if the universe remains in a static state.

Our perception of light and light speed is the key to understanding the dynamics of universe. Without a clear understanding of light we are locked into a static mode of thought.

The idea that light from distant galaxies has taken billions of years to reach us is a fabrication intended to extend the age of universe, as it is impossible to view ancient history simply because we are located at a perceived distance from a distant location.

The universe is dynamic.........it is dynamically structured and functions in a dynamic manner, which means the only thing remaining constant is change.

If you grasp relativity you will realize that the value of c remains relative to the system of reference, as the value of c is different for every such system. This means that the value of c is different for every atomic element, in that the value of c is a dynamic response to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

The measuring of light speed does not measure the linear motion of light, but measures a linear duration of time associated with the dynamic acceleration of the underlying field of frequency determining the condition of field.

To date we have confused linear and non-linear responses, as the light from distant stars does not travel toward us like a train or bus, which is why stars remain as tiny dots of light in the night sky. We see what there is to see at the moment we view the sky.

An optical lens modulates the condition of field, which can either increase or decrease the field of view.

Light is associated with an electromagnetic response and if we understand energy we know that the intensity of light increases with a decrease in energy and an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy. Therefore the underlying force of field which is non-linearly accelerating toward us, here on earth, is isometrically decelerating to the far reaches of space in a proportional manner, which explains the Doppler effect.

But, the light is not in linear motion..........the field itself is in non-linear motion focused to the center of field.

Therefore most of the light from distant stars is radiated isometrically away from us, which causes the viewed light to diminish in our direction.

There are no millions and billions of years, as this concept of time is an abstract human invention, intended for the purpose of convenience.

You cannot photograph ancient history through a telescope focused on remote galaxies, unless you know the underlying rate of field frequency associated with each star system viewed.

You can view history simply by viewing the moon or the sun, as the underlying rate of field frequency associated with those bodies is higher than that of our earth, but an increase in distance alone does not allow us to view ancient history.

The universe is not a mechanically driven static apparatus, but a dynamic system involving an infinite variety of field conditions.

Our existence is presently confined to the unified field of the earth, regardless of how far we might travel in space by means of linear propulsion.

We use the analogy of a train whistle to explain the Doppler effect, but a train is in linear motion. The analogy is not very helpful, as it makes not distinction between linear and non-linear motion.

The universe is acceleratively expanding at an ever increasing rate which remains relative to the system of reference, which is planet earth. The rate of expansion is proportional to the underlying field of energy acceleratively focused to the center of the earth's core.

From this we might realize that the light of distant galaxies is not in linear motion and moving toward us at the speed of light where it takes billions of years to reach us.

Light does not itself move toward us, as what we view is a non-simultaneous condition of field which is expanding isometrically away from us. Therefore we view the existing condition of field remaining relative to our earth, which has no relationship to our existing concept of time denoted in millions and billions of years. The existing view is contemporary to our present condition and not to the condition of remote and distant galaxies.

Space is not linearly structured, as it does not correspond to linear dimensions associated with our geometry. To understand this we can envision a conventional space craft attempting to reach the furthest stars. Our space ship would never reach its destination as it would be turned back due to the isometric decrease in field potential, (field energy), extending from the center of the earth's core.

Our space craft would gradually slow until it could not proceed any further and would be turned back. If it held together it would accelerate back toward the earth and at some point it would undoubtedly be torn apart by the process.

The acceleration of field is a condition of field in relation to a dynamic unified field of frequency, whereby this allows for changes to the relative condition of field extending from the center of field to the outer boundary of universe, but does not provide for the linear motion of any dynamic response.

Our perception of light in linear motion and or the linear bending of light does not help us to understand the dynamics of universe, as the linear motion of light would require the light itself to be in motion independent of the field in which it exists, which is quite impossible.

Light should be viewed as a relative dynamic response, in that the value of c is a relative variable, where an accelerating field of frequency determines an increasing value of c.

Both the past and future remaining relative to our earth exist beyond the relative boundaries of our existing condition of field and cannot be viewed through a telescope or any other apparatus located within the existing condition of field.

To access past and or future conditions of our field system requires us to access a simultaneous condition of field existing beyond the relative boundaries of our existing condition of field. There is no linear direction to past and or future, as non-linear modulation of field is required for this purpose, which should be left for another post.

(c)2006 David Barclay

Water

2006-04-02T17:33:00.000-07:00

I did not realize what a mystery water represented until I read a story on the subject at www.livescience.com
Evidently we do not understand why ice floats or why water expands when it freezes etc. So an understanding concerning the basic principles determining the behavior of water are still a work in progress. But maybe, just maybe, we can shed a little light on the subject.

To start, a water molecule consists of two hydrogen atoms and one atom of oxygen and as hydrogen has the highest underlying energy potential of any known element water is indeed very special.

Water evaporates into the sky and descends as rain, snow and or hail etc. so water goes up and down, in that it has the ability to defy gravity.

If you are in the mountains at an altitude of 10,000 feet above sea level you will find that water boils at 90 degrees C instead of 100 degrees C at sea level, which is usually attributed to a change in atmospheric pressure. Also, in the mountains water will remain frozen at a higher temperature than at sea level, which is also attributed to a drop in atmospheric pressure.

Of course there is a relationship between atmospheric pressure and the boiling and freezing of water, but this is not the whole story.

The inherent underlying energy of the water relative to the condition of field in which the water exists determines the condition of the water.

In this respect the underlying energy I refer to as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa), which is explained in detail on earlier posts.

Water at a high elevation above sea level has more underlying energy relative to the condition of field, existing at this high elevation, than at sea level.

It is the underlying energy potential of water which is the key factor in determining the behavior of water and not atmospheric pressure.

We also ascribe atmospheric pressure as being responsible for steam rising from a boiling kettle, where we say the steam or gas is lighter than air, but in making this reference we miss what occurs at the underlying level. Consequently we are puzzled by the behavior of water.

Why does ice float? Ice floats due to the increased ratio of energy per unit of mass associated with frozen water and the colder the ice the higher is the underlying energy potential in relation to the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Ice has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than liquid water, which is determined by the relationship existing between the water and the field in which the water is situated. Therefore we can determine that ice floating in liquid water at an elevation some distance above sea level is going to be more buoyant than ice floating in liquid water at sea level.

The changes in water from liquid to solid or from liquid to gas depends on the energy of the water relative to the condition of field in which the water is situated. In this respect a decrease in the energy of field will affect a proportional increase in the ratio of energy per unit of mass associated with the water.

Why does ice expand? Ice expands due to the increased energy of the water molecules relative to the condition of field in which the ice is situated. The spacing of the hydrogen and oxygen atoms is increased due to an increase in their underlying energy relative to the condition of field in which they are situated.

At very low temperatures ice actually shrinks, but it does not actually contract, as this has to do with the dispersion of atomic components as opposed to the idea of the ice actually contracting. This process requires a study in itself, which would be best left for another post.

In relation to Covalent bonds and Hydrogen bonds the hydrogen bonds are 10 times weaker than the covalent bonds. Why?

Covalent bonds correspond to the two bonds between two hydrogen atoms and the one oxygen atom in one water molecule, whereas the hydrogen bonds correspond to the bonds between one hydrogen atom of one molecule and one oxygen atom of another molecule.

The relationship existing between the two hydrogen atoms and the one oxygen atom are many times stronger than the hydrogen bonds existing between molecules, which is due to an inverse relationship.

To understand this we must realize that each atom exists as a unified field system unto itself, much like the earth or moon existing relative to the sun etc.

In relation to a single water molecule, there are 6 relative relationships existing between the three atoms. There are two oxygen/hydrogen systems, two hydrogen/oxygen systems and two hydrogen/hydrogen systems. The relative relationships existing between the oxygen atom and each of the two hydrogen atoms are not the same as the relationships existing between each of the hydrogen atoms and the oxygen atom, while the relationship between the first hydrogen atom and the second hydrogen atom is not the same as the relationship between the second and first hydrogen atom.

On top of this there is an underlying force of energy which is continuously accelerating relative to the system of reference, which determines the form and function of each atom and their relationship in a molecular format.

Only single atoms of hydrogen have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than a single molecule of water, which sets water apart from all other known matter. A water molecule is the basic molecule, nothing simpler is possible in relation to a molecular structure capable of remaining stable. Also it is not possible for a molecule to possess more energy than that associated with pure water.

As water vapor disperses into the upper atmosphere the hydrogen bonds break down and at an even higher altitude the covalent bonds finally break down as well, which allows free hydrogen atoms to escape into space, while allowing some of the oxygen atoms to fall back into the atmosphere.

The underlying energy of the earth's field is focused to the center of the earth's core whereby there is a proportional decrease in energy extending isometrically from the center of the earth's core to the furthest reaches of space. Therefore it is natural for hydrogen to rise skyward, as up is the path of least resistance for hydrogen due to its high underlying energy potential relative to the field of the earth in which it exists.

On the inside of the earth the reverse is true, as the internal dynamics effect inverse responses. Therefore, hydrogen within the earth tends to migrate to the center of the earth, while the heavier elements migrate toward the surface.

Water is a good coolant, because it takes a great deal of heat to lower the underlying energy of water molecules. In other words it takes a higher proportion of heat, (resistance), to heat water than it does most other liquids.

Hot water radiates heat, which is a factor of resistance, but the water does not radiate its underlying energy, as the energy is always focused to the center of field.

In relation to a single molecule of water, the oxygen atom represents the bulk of the molecules mass, and in relation to the increased mass of a water molecule consisting of one oxygen atom and two hydrogen atoms, the increase in mass causes a reduction in the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

One single hydrogen atom has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than two or more atoms of hydrogen forming a molecule of hydrogen, while a single atom of oxygen has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than when it is in combination with two atoms of hydrogen forming a water molecule.

On top of this it is important to note that the internal dynamics of each atom effect inverse responses inversely proportional to the external dynamics.

Of course this all sounds very complicated and to a point it is, but on the other hand it certainly simplifies our understanding in relation to the properties of water.

To demonstrate this clearly we could imagine water in an environment of low energy, which would effect a huge energy differential between the water and the field in which the water is situated. This situation would cause the water to disperse in to single molecules and if the energy of the field were low enough the molecules would break up into hydrogen and oxygen.

On the other hand where the energy of the field is increasing the opposite would be true.

In relation to the work of Nilsson and Saykally attempting to determine what happens when ice melts, it would seem strange indeed if liquid water retained the same structural dynamics as ice.

Of course water is water regardless of its state, but when ice melts it must lose a certain percentage of its underlying energy otherwise it would not melt.

The bonds, covalent and hydrogen, are the effect of field dynamics as determined by an underlying force of dynamic energy.

Only a fluctuation in the underlying dynamic force can affect change, therefore a change in the condition of field must affect a change in the structural dynamics of physical matter situated in that field.

If liquid water retained the tetrahedral arrangement of water molecules in ice, it would not be liquid water, but ice. In other words, the liquid water would not flow, but would be move more like a dragging chain.

Water flowing down hill loses energy as it flows, which keeps it flowing. It is only a decrease in the underlying energy of the water which allows it to flow from high ground to low. To flow from low ground to high would require the water to be gaining energy as it flowed relative to the field in which it was flowing.

Ice is an energy state of water, change the energy state and you change the condition of the water. Such a change in energy must also change the dynamic structure of the water molecules.

Therefore I am inclined to agree with Nilsson and his group of researchers.

It must also be noted that X-rays represent a non-uniform potential which distorts the uniform field continuance of water molecules, which is going to give one a distorted view of the situation. Making the assumption that at higher temperatures the bonds will bend and stretch where this should be seen through a microscope is a stretch in itself. In relation to the continuance of field frequency acceleration this might not be the case at all.

So, the X-ray argument is not very helpful in understanding the nature of water.

(c) 2006 David Barclay

Gravitomagnetic Induction of Gravitational Fields

2006-03-25T22:31:00.001-08:00

This post is in response to a story originating from the European Space Agency, so check out; http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0LVGJE_0.html
This story is entitled; Towards a new test for general relativity, dated March 23, 2006 and has now been archived at the above site under Education.

It would appear that Tajmar & Matos, the scientists responsible, have demonstrated the underlying force we at Gravity Control refer to as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa).

When you look at the drawing on the above site, you will notice the accelerative spin of the super conductive ring is opposite to the direction of the Gravitoelectric Field, which is to be expected.

The gravity of the sc ring is increasing as the ring accelerates, so this is not antigravity, but is in fact anti-antigravity. This is the exact opposite of antigravity where the gravity of a system would be decreasing relative to the field in which it is situated.

They make reference to gravitons which are theoretical gravitational particles, but no such particles exist as gravity is merely a condition of field and does not itself move independent of the accelerating underlying field, (ntffa).

The fact that the effect is one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein’s General Relativity predicts is huge, as this indicates there is something wrong with Einstein’s perception of the situation.

It is my contention that there is a ratio of energy per unit of mass, in that the ratio of energy per unit of mass is different for every system of reference. This means that the ratio of energy per unit of mass is a relative consideration associated with the dynamic structure of all physical matter.

In that the sc ring is linearly accelerating, the underlying dynamic energy of the ring is decreasing in inverse proportion to the rate of linear acceleration, this accounts for this huge difference in Einstein’s theoretical prediction and the experimental results.

The experimental results reported to the ESA correspond directly to the condition of field associated with the underlying dynamics of the super conductive ring.

The linearly accelerating sc ring acts against the underlying field in which the test is run, which is the field of the Earth.

The linear acceleration of the ring is resistant to a further increase in acceleration while the nonlinear acceleration of (ntffa) is non-resistant to a further increase in nonlinear acceleration. Therefore the ratio of energy per unit of mass associated with the ring decreases in inverse proportion to the increase in its linear acceleration. This affects an increase in both the gravitoelectric field and the gravitomagnetic field, which may seem a bit confusing to some.

It is important to note that the underlying force of field, (ntffa) does not radiate, but is focused to the center of field, as what radiates is a factor of resistance corresponding to a differential in the underlying force. In this respect the factor of resistance increases isometrically from the center of field.

What has occurred here is that the linear acceleration of the ring has decreased the underlying dynamics of the ring, which in turn causes a decrease in energy and an increase in resistance relative to the field in which the ring exists.

An increase in resistance affects a decrease in energy and an increase in gravity, whereas a decrease in resistance affects an increase in energy and a decrease in gravity relative to the system of reference.

This experimental evidence supports the contentions of gravity control and the theoretical principles upon which Unity is designed.

When the super conductive ring is stationary, it cannot be slowed any further in terms of linear motion, which makes it appear that a controlled decrease in the gravity of the ring should not be possible other than by the process of freezing and the induction of an electrical charge, which is perfectly correct.

To effect a decrease in gravity the underlying force itself must be modulated in a controlled manner, whereby affecting the underlying dynamics in the desired manner. An increase in (ntffa) can be achieved by the simple focusing of field relative to the system of reference, which in turn affects an increase in the underlying energy, a decrease in resistance and a decrease in gravity relative to the system of reference.

This would suggest that Einstein’s equation, E=MC2, can only be applied in a very general sense, as there is a discrepancy in energy from one system to another, such as the various atomic elements.

Each element has its own energy potential corresponding to a specific ratio of energy per unit of mass, which means that Einstein’s equation is less than accurate.

Furthermore, when a molecular structure is reduced in size, even to the state of single atoms, each of the constituent portions is affected by an increase in energy, in relation to an underlying ratio of energy per unit of mass. This means the larger mass has less energy per unit of mass than if the same mass is reduced to a number of smaller portions.

The underlying energy of any system cannot be physically accessed in a manner which would cause energy to radiate, as energy does not radiate but is always focused to the center of field.

This spinning super conductor forms a field within the field of the Earth

The linear acceleration of the super conductive ring is acting against the underlying nonlinear acceleration of field, (aether), which supplies direct experimental evidence of (ntffa)’s (aether) existence.

We at Gravity Control give two thumbs up to Tajmar & Matos and thank them for their important contribution to field dynamics.

© 2006 David Barclay

Tree Power

2006-02-23T01:05:00.000-08:00

A tree is an amazing piece of work, as a tree is designed to modulate its internal dynamics relative to the field in which it is situated.

In this respect the modulation of the internal dynamics affects both a gravitational response and an electromagnetic response in relation to the underlying force of energy associated with the tree’s physical structure.

It is commonly thought that the electrical charge which can be extracted from a tree results from an electrochemical reaction, despite the fact that during the winter months when the tree is relatively dormant and or inactive and the leaves are gone from its branches, the extractible voltage increases by 50%.

At the present time the underlying force is not considered or even acknowledged in this respect, nor is the inverse relationship of internal and external dynamics.  In fact it is not presently accepted or acknowledged that a distinct difference between internal and external dynamics even exists, as the internal dynamics are considered to be nothing more than an extension of the external dynamics.

If we could grasp the idea of an underlying force of energy affecting the inverse relationship of internal and external dynamics we might begin to realize just how much we have been missing.

If we took the basic design of a tree and applied the underlying force we could easily build a modular apparatus capable of providing us with electrical power without the consumption of a fuel.

A tree provides a differential in dynamic potential between the internal dynamics of the tree and the field in which the tree exists.  And as the field in which the tree exists is itself electrically charged there is a differential in charge between the internal structure of the tree and the external field. This provides a net differential in charge, which can be adapted to provide for useable electrical power.

This is aside from the fact that the tree also affects a differential in gravity allowing for the raising and lowering of fluids up and down the xylem.

Of course this defies accepted physics, but so do a lot of things which remain without a reasonable explanation.
Much is inferred and much more is assumed, but a tree does provide a proof of principle in relation to an underlying force determining the form and function of all physical structure.

Many people around the world have stuck a piece of copper pipe in the ground, driven a nail into a tree and applied a common electrical meter to detect a flow of electrical current.  But most of those people insist this must be an electrochemical effect, yet there is no evidence to demonstrate or support this idea anymore than there is to demonstrate the mechanics thought to allow for the lifting and lowering of fluid through the xylem.

The tree is an inverted version of Unity, but regardless of which way up the apparatus is positioned you still get a dynamic response in the form of both a gravitational and an electromagnetic response.

The simplicity of this system is overwhelming, no question about that, but such simplicity can also be considered to represent a lack of understanding in relation to the complexities of our modern science.

A tree focuses the underlying force of energy inherent to its form and function, in terms of a continuance of field structure associated with the form and function of a tree.

The idea of a continuance of field structure comes from asking why the physical structure of universe does not simply fold on itself, despite the fact that it does not.

Without an underlying force allowing for the continuance of field structure the physical structure of universe would fold on itself, but this problem can be easily ignored or simply dismissed due to the fact that physical structure does not fold on itself.  Yet there is no meaningful answer to the question without the inclusion of the underlying force.

So here we have a system capable of providing us with all the energy we could possibly use and desperately need, yet for the most part we refuse to acknowledge the possibility.

Such an attitude seems less than rational if we are not willing to even consider the possibility.  Especially in light of the fact that we still remain unsure what gravity or electricity actually are.  On top of this we do not know exactly what energy is either, which further compounds the problem.

It is time to put the biased views aside and consider the possibility of a new approach to long standing problems and misunderstandings, as the benefits far outweigh the option of continuing as we have.

We are destroying our environment without benefit or merit to anyone simply for the sake of maintaining the status quo.  Yet there are options which we have yet to address or even consider in an open minded and even handed manner.

What we can learn from a tree should allow us to develop a self sustaining system of energy production far beyond the limitations of our existing and or future needs.

© David Barclay 2006

Field Control

2006-02-17T01:14:00.000-08:00

Most of us believe gravity holds the planets in orbit around the sun, but in that gravity is not itself a force of any kind and what we refer to as gravity is merely a dynamic response to the condition of field, it would seem impossible for gravity to hold the planets in orbit around the sun or the moon in orbit around the earth.

Gravity is in fact a no show or a non-event, as gravity itself doesn’t do anything.

The relatively stable orbit of the earth around the sun and the orbit of the moon around the earth are due to a differential in the underlying force of energy determining the form and function of all three systems, in respect to an underlying force of energy referred to as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa).

As the acceleration of (ntffa) is non-resistant an increase in the underlying energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, whereas a decrease in the underlying energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

In respect to the energy potential of each system, the sun has the greater energy potential, with the earth second and the moon third.  But because the moon is the smallest of the three, the moon has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass, the earth second and the sun third.

The dynamic relationship existing between the earth and the sun is inversely proportional to the dynamic relationship existing between the earth and the moon.

Also, the internal and external dynamics of all three systems are inversely proportional to each other in relation to the inside and the outside or each system effecting inversely proportional dynamic responses.

It is a differential in energy and resistance which holds the earth in orbit around the sun, in that the sun and the earth exist as separate fields.  The sun exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the sun, while the earth also exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the earth.  The moon too exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the moon.

The earth exists as a unified field existing within the unified field of the sun and as a unified field existing within the unified field of the moon, while the moon exists as a unified field existing within the unified field of the earth and as a unified field existing within the unified field of the sun.  The sun exists as a unified field existing within the field of the earth and as a unified field existing within the field of the moon.

The moon having the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass is able to maintain a stable orbit around the earth, while the underlying energy of both the earth and moon continues to accelerate with the moon having the higher rate of field frequency acceleration.

This situation provides both a differential in energy and a differential in resistance affecting the orbit of the moon around the earth.

The moon having the higher rate of (ntffa) is resistant to the acceleration of the earth’s field which is symmetrically focused to the center of the earth.
And because the field of the moon is accelerating faster than that of the earth, the moon is slowly receding away from the earth.  This is due to the differential in energy and resistance continuously increasing.

In relation to the earth in orbit around the sun, the earth is resistant to the acceleration of the sun’s field which is symmetrically focused to the center of the sun.  And because the field of the earth is accelerating slower than that of the sun, the sun is receding slowly away from the earth, despite the fact that the sun is at the center of the solar field.

It is important to note, that as much as the universe is acceleratively expanding so is the dynamic structure of the sun, earth and moon also expanding in proportion to their rates of field frequency acceleration.

Without a differential in the underlying energy of each system, where the smaller body of mass has the higher ratio of energy to mass it would be impossible for separate bodies of mass to exist, as all the mass of universe would otherwise remain as a single body of mass.

In relation to the ratio of energy to mass, the larger mass always has the greater net energy, while the smaller mass has less net energy but a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.

A single block of a single element weighing 100 grams would have more energy than a 50 gram block of the same element, but 100 one gram pieces of the same element would have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than either the 100 gram block or the 50 gram block.

In relation to the attraction between two bodies of mass, such as the earth and the moon, an increasing differential in the underlying energy of both bodies decreases the attraction and causes an increase in the space between them.

Although the rate at which the differential in the underlying energy of both bodies increases is very slow it is nonetheless a process of dynamic modulation affecting field control.  In other words the process we are searching for which would allow for gravity control is in fact the very process which allows for the moon to remain in orbit around the earth.

As long as the underlying energy of the moon continues to increase the moon will continue to move away from the earth.

In relation to the earth/sun system there is an inverse relationship to that of the earth/moon system, but as the underlying energy of the sun continues to increase, at a much higher rate than either the earth or the moon, the relative dynamic balance existing between the earth and the sun will eventually become unstable and the earth will be forced away from the sun and into a new orbit.

The reason for this is that the earth has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass, in relation to the earth/sun system.

If we consider the element hydrogen having the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass, of any known element, we can understand why hydrogen is so difficult to transform to a metallic state.

Hydrogen lacks sufficient relative resistance to accommodate a metallic state, in relation to the relative relationship of hydrogen existing within the field of the earth.  If hydrogen were situated in a much more highly accelerated field of (ntffa) it would be easier for hydrogen to be transformed and remain in a metallic state.

Hydrogen is so high in energy that it is resistant to the field of the earth, which is why a hydrogen balloon rises skyward, which is also true of a helium balloon.

If we consider gravity to have served as a stand-in while we attempted to understand the dynamics involved, we should by now realize that it is time to let gravity go and consider the application of field dynamics in its place.

The Expanding Universe

2006-02-11T17:42:00.000-08:00

Up until 1999 it was believed that the universe was expanding, but at a decelerating rate of expansion, meaning that the expansion was slowing due to the mutual gravitational attraction of all the matter in the universe.

Then in 1999 it was discovered that the expansion of universe was in fact accelerating, but what exactly causes this acceleration is not known, but whatever it is, is not presently considered to be within the realm of Standard Model Physics.

That the universe could expand at a decelerating rate of expansion seems to defy logic, but this was the case up until 1999.

To understand this more clearly we must realize that gravitational attraction decreases in proportion to the square of the distance.  Therefore, the mere fact that the universe is expanding would or should indicate that the gravitational attraction must be decreasing in proportion to the rate of expansion.  And this being the case, the rate of expansion would continue to accelerate.

It would be impossible for the expansion of universe to be deceleratively expanding; as the universe is either acceleratively expanding or it is not expanding at all.

Now, we are told that the universe has only been acceleratively expanding for the last 5 billion years, as prior to this it was deceleratively expanding.

This period of decelerative expansion occurred between the period of inflation associated with the big bang and 5 billion years ago, which could involve as much as 9 billion years of decelerative expansion.

However, in order for this to be considered possible or even rational requires a complete revision of the existing laws governing gravity, as the rules governing gravity must have been much different 5 billion years ago.  But I have yet to see any new rules for gravity dating back 5 billion years.

It is presently considered that dark energy is responsible for the accelerative expansion of universe, but no one knows exactly what dark energy is, what it would look like or if it even exists.

It would appear that the basic tenets of relativity are not very well understood by the majority of those individuals possessing a PhD in physics.

The idea of the universe expanding at a decelerative rate of expansion is either pure speculation or a creative idea intended to hold the rest of the puzzle together, but in order for decelerative expansion to be possible requires us to scrap our existing laws of gravity.

Gravity increases and decreases in proportion to the square of the distance and to date no one has found this statement to be in error.

Yet, it would seem that some of the rules can be ignored when it is convenient to do so, simply to maintain the appearance of a knowledgeable understanding.  But unfortunately such an attitude is less than logical.

Science is based on facts and not fantasy, yet it would seem that the idea of an expanding universe capable of maintaining a decelerative rate of expansion should be considered factual despite being routed in fantasy or drunken stupidity.

An expanding universe must be acceleratively expanding or it is not expanding.  You have two flavors to choose from, accelerative expansion or accelerative contraction, in relation to the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.  There is simply no such thing as decelerative expansion or decelerative contraction.

© 2006 David Barclay

Rings & Lifters

2006-02-07T00:29:00.000-08:00

There is a lot of interest in the levitation of rings and lifters, in relation to the possibility of these experimental models resulting in the control of gravity.

In all of these cases, an electrical current is induced into the metallic structure of the model, which results in the observed levitation.  Yet, it would appear that a satisfactory explanation for the resulting levitation is not forthcoming.

I would suggest that such demonstrations involving levitation do not represent the controlled modulation of gravity, but more accurately represent a distortion of the field associated with the structural dynamics of the various models reacting to the field in which the model exists.

To understand this situation it must be affirmed that gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but is merely a dynamic response corresponding to the potential of an underlying force of energy inherent to the field in which we presently exist.

Therefore the falling or rising of any physical structure is based upon the condition of field, where the dynamics of a physical structure respond to the condition of the field in which the physical structure exists.

For a physical structure to levitate or rise skyward there must be an increase in the underlying force of energy affecting the dynamics of the physical structure relative to the field in which it is levitating.  In other words the resistance of the physical structure to the field in which it is situated must be decreased.

For a physical structure to fall, understanding that falling is dynamic motion, there must be a decrease in the underlying force of energy affecting the dynamics of the physical structure relative to the field in which it is falling.  In other words the resistance of the physical structure to the field in which it is situated must be increased.

As there are both internal and external dynamics affecting any physical structure, the internal and external dynamics remain inversely proportional in relation to an internal and external gravitational response with the electromagnetic potential remaining proportional to the gravitational response.

In this respect the gravitational response decreases symmetrically from the surface curve to the center of field and decreases isometrically from the surface curve to the perimeter of Universe, while the electromagnetic response remains proportional to the gravitational response.

When an electrical charge is applied to the conductive framework of a ring or lifter it affects an inversely proportional response internally, in relation to the internal dynamics responding to the external dynamics.  As it is an electromagnetic response which is induced this affects an increase in the resistance of the ring or lifter to the field in which the ring or lifter is situated.  This corresponds to a decrease in the energy potential of the ring or lifter, which actually increases the gravitational response of the ring or lifter.  This is the exact opposite of what was intended or thought to be demonstrated, as this is actually anti-antigravity and not antigravity.

This in turn causes the ring of lifter to be repelled upward, much like two like poles being repelled.

As soon as the charge is discontinued the ring or lifter experiences an immediate decrease in resistance to the field in which it exists, causing the ring or lifter to fall rather than rise.

This is similar to the experiment where a frog is made to move its legs in response to an electrical charge, but the simple manipulation of a frog’s legs does not constitute control of the frog or the control of the frog’s life force.

The same is true of the ring or lifter, as the levitation of the ring or lifter by means of an electrical charge does not constitute gravity control or even the controlled modulation of the ring or lifter’s underlying dynamics.


© 2006 David Barclay

The Core

2006-01-17T21:54:00.000-08:00

It is presently accepted that gravity increases to the center of the earth’s core, which would place a significant gravity well on the head of a pin located at the center of the earth’s core.

It is also accepted that the earth’s core consists of a sold or liquid metallic mass of iron and or nickel.

You have to ask yourself how this situation would affect the structural dynamics of the earth.

This accepted model does not allow for or provide for any distinction between the external dynamics and the internal dynamics, as the increasing gravity to the center of the core is merely a continuation of the external dynamics, which makes it difficult to make a clear distinction between the outside and the inside of the earth, despite the fact that such a distinction does exist.

It is not possible to physically access the internal dynamics of the earth or any other physical body from the outside as any attempt to access the internal dynamics merely extends the external dynamics while maintaining the integrity of the internal dynamics.  So digging a hole or breaking something into pieces does not provide any information concerning the internal dynamics.

If we consider the earth to represent a balanced structure it would seem natural that the internal and external dynamics should remain balanced.

Having gravity increasing to the center of the earth would not provide a balanced structure.  And it must be noted that we still do not fully understand what gravity is or if it is in fact a force of any kind.

If gravity is merely a dynamic response to an underlying force it is possible that gravity does not increase to the center of the earth, but that gravity actually decreases symmetrically from the surface curve to the center of the earth’s core just as it decreases isometrically from the earth’s surface curve into space.

The question would be to explain the mass of the earth in relation to the bulk of the earth’s mass being located within the inner core?

If the earth is viewed as a dynamic field structure it would seem reasonable to expect that an underlying force of energy would be involved in sustaining and perpetuating the earth’s structural dynamics.  And if this underlying force of energy increased proportionally to the center of the earth’s core it would be expected that there would be a significant increase in energy within the core.

Furthermore, if this underlying force of energy was in fact accelerating as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration focused to the center of the earth’s core we would find the internal dynamics and dimensions to far exceed anything we had previously considered in relation to our standard geometric evaluation of the earths interior.

We would then find that the internal space of the earth was inversely proportional to the external space of the earth, whereby instead of the internal space pinching out close the center of the core it actually expanded in a non-linear fashion.  Therefore close to the center of the earth’s core the space would be immense in proportion to our perception of the earth’s linear dimensions.

In other words, it would be impossible for us to determine the radius of the earth simply by using the circumference as our base point.

We would also find that the core of the earth was composed of a gaseous mixture rarefied to the center of the core in the form of hydrogen.

On the basis of this we would also find the earth to be dynamically structured in such a fashion as to provide for a stable field structure.

A deep gravity well at the center of the earth’s core would correspond to the condition of a black hole, where the dynamics work in a reversed order from those of the earth and our neighboring planets, moons and sun.

Externally, gravity causes a falling mass to accelerate in free fall toward the earth’s surface, whereas within the earth the heavy elements are forced to migrate towards the earth’s surface without the acceleration associated with free fall.  Therefore the movement of the heavy elements toward the surface is slow and continues as an on going process.

This places the earth’s highest gravity across the surface curve with fluctuations increasing horizontally with distance from the equator toward the poles, vertically with increases in elevation above sea level and with increases in ocean depth measured at sea level.

There is a distinct differential in the gravity of the moon and the gravity of the earth with the moon having the least gravity but having the greater ratio of energy per unit of mass, which is associated with the attraction of other bodies.  This is why the moon has suffered such a large number of hits from meteors and asteroids.  Gravity has nothing to do with it, as gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but merely a dynamic response to the underlying dynamic force of non-linear time field frequency acceleration, which is always focused to the center of field.

The core of the earth represents an immense energy well which is uniformly focused to the center of the core and as hydrogen has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass of any known element it is not unreasonable to suggest the possibility of hydrogen being produced within the core, in relation to the transformation of energy to mass.

GLOBAL WARMING

2006-01-08T00:56:00.000-08:00

If you consider the dynamics of the earth/sun system you will realize that there is an increasing differential in the non-uniform energy potential existing between the earth and the sun.

The degree of non-uniformity is focused toward the sun, which is very fortunate otherwise we would be burned to a cinder.  But as this dynamic differential increases so does the intensity of the solar mass which affects an increase in the solar resistance which radiates isometrically.  This in turn directly affects global warming.

However, there is much more involved, as each element has a different ratio of energy to mass, in terms of a relative ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Also there is an increasing differential in dynamic potential existing between the lighter elements and the field of the earth in which they exist.

This means that the lighter elements are becoming lighter relative to the field in which they exist, as their dynamic acceleration is proportionally greater than that of the field in which they exist.

In relation to global warming this causes more moisture to evaporate and more precipitation, but it also means that the smallest possible size of H2O molecules capable of falling as rain, sleet, hail or snow must be increasing.

As the relative dynamic potential of the earth’s field decreases isometrically from the center of the earth’s core to the infinite depths of space, while the differential in dynamic potential between the lighter atmospheric elements and the earth’s field increases with altitude I would consider it natural for some of these lighter elements to be escaping into space, especially hydrogen and oxygen.

Over time the level of oxygen in our earth’s atmosphere has dropped from 30% to 20% and is still decreasing, while the level of CO2 is increasing.

This would suggest that the oxygen depletion of our planet is partly due to a bleeding of the earth’s atmosphere into space.

As previously discussed in my earlier posts, the four directions of the earth’s underlying dynamics corresponding to NON-LINEAR TIME FIELD FREQUENCY ACCELERATION, (ntffa), are in the direction of the earth’s rotational spin, from the equator to the North Pole, from the equator to the South Pole and symmetrically to the center of the earth’s core, air turbulence circulates from the equator to the poles.  And as the underlying potential of (ntffa) is continually increasing, variations in weather intensity should increase proportionally.

As the intensity of the solar potential increases so does the level of resistance radiating isometrically from the sun, which directly affects the warming of the earth and our neighboring planets.

Human industry creates pollution in our environment, which must be controlled, but this is not the whole problem or the whole solution.

The underlying energy of the solar field is increasing, which is focused to the core of the sun.  This causes a non-uniform differential in energy existing between the earth and the sun, which is focused toward the sun, and as the potential of the sun is increasing faster than that of the earth the differential in resistance is radiated outwardly from the sun in an isometric manner.  This radiated resistance has a dramatic effect on the condition of our planet, which is in part manifest as global warming.

Consequently this is not the best time for a break down in the ozone layer, as this further complicates the situation.

We are losing oxygen as our atmosphere is slowly bleeding into space, which is due to the natural dynamics of our solar field system.

It can be expected that the earth/sun cycle will culminate in the earth being forced from its existing orbit and repositioned further from the sun, which would result in a dramatic decrease in the earth’s surface temperature.

There is a direct relationship between global warming and gravity control, in relation to the science and technology involved in the controlled modulation of the underlying force, (ntffa).  Therefore, it is essential that we give serious consideration to the causes and implications of global warming in order that we might find solutions by which to ensure our survival.

Reverse Engineering UFO Type Craft

2005-11-26T23:28:00.000-08:00

It seems everyone knows about Area 51, but no one seems sure what they do there, so we hear a lot of stories about reverse engineering downed alien space craft.

If they have an alien space craft why do they need to reverse engineer it? Is it broken or is it that they can't read the operators manual? Seems a little odd to be reverse engineering something that works.

Then we hear that element 115 is saucer fuel, as reported by an ex-employee from Area 51. And if element 115 is in fact the alien fuel of choice I would not put too much faith in this alien technology. In fact I would not even consider such technology to be advanced, as element 115 is nasty stuff. Area 51, element 115?

Somehow I picture those in charge actually knowing what they are doing, but maybe that idea is far too rational and or idealistic.

I suspect that the principles upon which such a craft is based represent quite a hurdle, as getting from there to here in a reasonable length of time and in one piece would suggest that advanced physics would be involved.

For example; if alien craft employ instantaneous transformation, this would explain why they are never noticed coming or going from our air space, as they simply enter or exit through our own air space and do not actually travel the spatial dimensions of space as our conventional aerospace systems do.

It would appear that they have the ability to modulate an underlying force affecting the condition of field, whereby the modulation of the field itself allows them instantaneous access to anywhere they wish to travel.

And as far as gravity goes, they would have a solid grasp of that subject too, in respect to gravity being a dynamic response corresponding to the condition of field. So by controlling the underlying force affecting the condition of field they would also control gravity.

Consider for the moment that instantaneous transformation does not involve having to transit the spatial dimensions of space, whereby the spatial dimensions are simply avoided or by passed. In other words they detour the spatial dimensions by modulating the condition of field, which sounds pretty wild doesn't it?

So, you don't have to beam yourself from Point A to Point B or arrive without any clothes. You simply modulate the space and motion existing relative to Point A to the condition of Point B and you are there, which is amazingly simple.

The idea of finding a method by which to travel faster than the speed of light is completely unnecessary, as you cannot go any faster than instantaneous travel.

But what is so amazing about this is that you don't actually travel anywhere in terms of conventional travel.

Right now we are planning a manned mission to Mars, which we expect will involve a very long voyage. A little like planning to sail around the world in a rubber raft.

It would appear that a more practical method of space travel is beyond our comprehension, despite the fact that we continue to spend billions of dollars on secret research and development programs at Area 51. So there is something wrong with this picture, as it seems insane that we would be attempting to reverse engineer UFO type craft and at the same time planning for a manned mission to Mars on the back of a conventional rocket. The idea seems absurd, but maybe I'm trying to be too rational.

The big question in many peoples minds seems to be the propulsion involved, which may explain why the reverse engineering of UFO type craft seems to take so long. It would appear that we are stuck on this idea of propulsion, when in fact there may not be a system of propulsion involved, at least not in respect to our existing perception of propulsion.

We expect something to be consumed as fuel, whereby a force of push or pull causes the craft to move. But what if there is no fuel and there is no force of push or pull? In this case it would appear that we are completely lost.

Must be nuclear they say, like element 115. Not a chance in hell would it be nuclear. And if that's what they think, they don't know much.

The drive system for a UFO type craft is not going to consume fuel of any kind, as the whole idea is to modulate the field of the craft, where the field of the craft itself is different than the field in which the craft is seen to operate.

In other words, the craft exists as a unified field system where all other systems exist relative to the craft, so if we have a UFO type craft operating in our air space the craft exists as a field within the field of our planet Earth. So we have a field within a field.

The conditions remaining relative to the craft are not identical to the conditions remaining relative to our planet Earth, which is why we find it very difficult if not impossible to catch a UFO or shoot one down. So there is a dynamic differential in the underlying force of energy affecting the condition of a UFO type craft and a conventional jet aircraft, which means the UFO type craft is the superior rig.

If you examine Project Unity by clicking "antigravity" on the front page of www.graviytycontrol.org you will see that the drive system is a magnetic configuration. The craft does not spin, nor do its internal parts spin, as there is no spinning involved. It is a simple process of focus, much like the focusing of a optical lens. Yes, it's just that simple.

No turning of wheels, not jet thrusters, no push and no pull, just the simple modulation of field dynamics, in terms of a unified field system.

Perhaps back engineering has more to do with navigation, as it might appear baffling that you could steer an aerospace system without turning or banking.

Navigating by field focus is perhaps a great deal easier than one might suspect, as the craft will move in the direction of focus. And should the direction of focus be reversed the craft moves in the opposite direction without having slowed or turned, which a conventional craft could not do, nor would the pilot survive, at least not at 15,000 MPH.

If the field of a UFO type craft is in fact a unified field system, the craft's center of gravity is at the center of the craft. Therefore there is no force of gravity to overcome during such a manouver. A pilot could reverse his direction of travel at full speed and not even spill his coffee.

At the present time we talk about hyperdimensional velocities when in fact there is no such thing. No physical mass can achieve light speed, yet it is possible to travel much faster than light, but not as a physical mass existing within the field of the Earth.

Once we get used to the idea of an underlying force affecting the condition of field we can see that the modulation of field dynamics is something quite apart from our linear perception of push and pull.

If we modulate the field of our craft to the relative upper possible limit we are already moving faster than light, as we have left the relative confines of the present moment and are now experiencing instantaneous transformation to our next destination. There is no mass resistance involved if you can imagine such a thing, as it is mass resistance which keeps the universe relative to our planet.

By modulating the field of the craft you have altered the dynamics of universe remaining relative to the craft. So it would be possible to travel what we now consider billions of light years in the blink of an eye.

It sounds quite impossible until you take the time to consider the situation in terms of an underlying dynamic force, which is something we have failed to address so far. Even Tesla spoke of the underlying dynamics and the inherent possibilities which had yet to be considered.

If we are confined by the process of back engineering we need to take a few steps back and consider the possibility that we may have missed the most important aspect of the exercise. We may have attempted to confine the function of the craft to our existing perceptions without allowing for the possibility that such a craft might function beyond the limits of those perceptions. And if this is the case we desperately need to reconsider our thinking, as the function of the craft is certainly not going to change.

So the reverse engineering of a UFO type craft is limited to the talents of those involved in the process. And if they are restrained by their own limitations no amount of increased funding is going to solve the problem, because the problem is not a scientific or technical aerospace problem, it's a psychological problem.

Thanks to Jerry Decker and Robert Koontz

2005-11-22T23:07:00.000-08:00

Thanks to Jerry Decker and Robert Koontz for supplying information on the Clem Motor.

Jerry Decker of Keely Net deserves three cheers for his continuous effort in providing a valuable source of information to all interested parties.

http://www.keelynet.com/energy/clemcone.htm

At the above link to keelynet you will find further information on the Clem Motor including some very fine drawings.

Clem Motor Explained

2005-11-22T22:55:00.000-08:00

The Clem Motor Explained

To understand the Clem Motor one must be familiar with the principles of theory associated with the underlying dynamics of field, in that the underlying force, known as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa), determines the form and function of all physical structure.

For work to be done requires a dynamic differential in the underlying energy.

To understand the underlying dynamics we can look at a simple waterwheel, where we can examine the relationship of energy and resistance.

A waterwheel is driven by the flow of water pushing against the paddles of the wheel, while the flow of the water corresponds to a gravitational response as determined by the underlying condition of field.

The flowing water is following the path of least resistance in respect to the direction of Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa), affecting a gravitational response.  And as the water flows downhill it loses energy relative the field in which it is flowing.  In other words, as the water flows downhill the water itself loses energy in proportion to the increasing energy of the field focused to the center of the Earth.

It is important to understand that if the water itself possessed sufficient energy, relative to the field in which it is located, the water would not flow.

When the water encounters the paddles of the waterwheel, the water pushes against the paddles while the paddles resist the force of the water.

As the paddles are resistant to the flow of the water, the flowing water causes the paddles to move whereby the waterwheel is forced to turn.

But so is the flow of the water resistant to the paddles, which results in the paddles slowing the flow of the water.  And as the water slows it gains energy in relation to the underlying energy of the water, as it is an increase in energy which causes the flow of the water to slow relative to the resistance of the paddles.

In turn the paddles cause the waterwheel to turn and the faster the waterwheel turns the greater is the wheels loss of energy.

If the waterwheel was not turning it would not experience a loss of energy.
It is a dynamic differential in energy which causes the waterwheel to turn, where the wheel is losing energy and the water is gaining energy relative to the field in which the waterwheel exists.

If for some reason there is insufficient water or the flow of water is diverted away from the waterwheel the wheel will stop turning as there is insufficient power or resistance to affect the motion of the wheel.

Now we come to the Clem Motor where a fluid is employed to drive the spiral grooved cone.

The rotation of the cone causes the cone to lose energy as the cone is resistant to the flow of the fluid, but so is the fluid resistant to the rotation of the cone.  This causes both the fluid and the cone to lose energy relative to the field in which the motor is located, which affects a proportional degree of resistance relative to the accelerating field in which the motor is located.

The fluid flowing through the spiral groove in the cone does not slow down as the groove becomes shallower as the radius of the cone increases.

The decrease in the channel or groove depth is proportional to an increase in the cone diameter, and as the diameter doubles so does the circumference of the cone.  This means the fluid has to travel twice as far in the same time to maintain a constant slip velocity.  So by reducing the channel or groove depth in half the fluid velocity is doubled thereby keeping the slip constant.

The spiral channels or grooves could be thought of as very long convergent nozzles.  The increase in fluid velocity is in the opposite direction of the rotor or cone spin.  We should expect a reaction force from the acceleration of the fluid.  This thrust would be directed tangent to the circumference and would increase the spin torque on the rotor or cone.  So even without the peripheral nozzles the rotor or cone experiences a thrust force in a direction that would self-propel it.

It should be noted that as the velocity increases in the channels or grooves the pressure also increases.  But Bernoulli’s Law requires the pressure to drop proportionally as the velocity increases, but this does not happen.

As the fluid is discharged at the bottom of the cone it goes directly to a heat exchanger which reduces the temperature of the fluid, which in turn increases the underlying energy of the fluid.  So when the fluid re-enters the top of the cone the fluid is in a re-energized state.

Therefore there is a continuous dynamic differential in energy existing between the rotation of the cone and the flow of the fluid which is maintained by the continuous cooling of the fluid by the heat exchanger.

At 200 pounds in weight the Clem Motor runs at 300 degrees F, the cone rotates at between 2600 and 2800 rpm and produces 350HP on a continuous basis.

If the flow of fluid is stopped the motor stops, but as long as the fluid flows the motor keeps running.

Once the motor reaches its optimum running temperature the motor becomes a self driving system, as no fuel is consumed in the process of its operation.

A twelve volt battery is employed during the start-up, which is recharged as the motor operates.  So the battery can be employed to run electronic gauges and lights as required.

The Aether

2005-11-04T18:35:00.000-08:00

The Aether

I recently read, “By now it should be obvious that the larger the mass the more aether flows into the atomic structure of the mass.”

This statement sounds fairly straight forward, but it is anything but straight forward.  It throws a real curve ball into the works, as it could be read to mean that the larger mass receives more energy from the aether.

In part this is true, but in part it is false, as it depends on the circumstances of the situation involved, which are not specified.  It is simply stated to represent a general rule, which is far from an accurate statement.

The Earth has a greater mass, in terms of a general perception of mass, than the moon, but there is more aether flowing into the moon than the Earth.  On the other hand the Sun has a greater mass than the Earth whereby there is more aether flowing into the Sun than the Earth.

Each atomic structure has its own field, which means that each atomic structure has its own aether flow focused to the center of field.

As a high mass atomic structure is more resistant to the field in which it exists than a low mass atomic structure the high mass atomic structures receive less energy per unit of mass than the low mass atomic structures.

In other words a hydrogen atom has more energy than an oxygen atom, because the field of the hydrogen atom is less resistant to the aether flow.

But, in a more general sense a greater mass of hydrogen, involving many hydrogen atoms, has a greater flow of aether into its structure than a smaller mass of hydrogen.

Still, a deuterium atom has less energy than a protium atom and a tritium atom has less energy than a deuterium atom, in relation to a ratio of energy to mass.

So, the idea that a larger mass corresponds to a large energy potential is not completely correct or completely true.  The idea is misleading and gives one a very distorted view of energy in relation to a proportional potential of energy corresponding to a proportional quantity of mass, as no such proportional relationship exists.

In that the mass is resistant to the flow of the aether or the mass is resistant to the field in which it exists, it would appear that the larger the mass the more resistance there would be to the flow of the aether.

In other words the larger or greater the mass, the less aether flows into the structure of the mass, because the increased resistance slows the aether flow.

The aether is a field of frequency which is continuously accelerating; therefore it is the rate of acceleration which determines the flow of the aether, consequently, the greater the resistance the slower the rate of acceleration affecting the atomic structure of the mass.

This is where assumptions become problematic, as it is assumed on the basis of energy being proportional to mass that an increase in mass would always indicate an increase in energy.

If we examine the equation E=MC2 we will see that this equation only holds true under certain conditions, such as where the ratio of energy to mass is the same for all elements.  In other words, according to this equation the ratio of energy to mass is the same for every element, when in fact such a thing is a relative impossibility.

This is an important point, which must be considered, as the idea of each and every element having an equal ratio of energy to mass distorts our perception of energy and allows us to reflect on a false assessment.

The ratio of energy to mass must be different for each and every element, otherwise there would be no dynamic difference existing between the elements, as the only difference would be a question of mass.

If each and every element is resistant to the aether or the field in which they collectively exist, then the ratio of resistance to mass would be the same for all of the elements, as it is the mass which is resistant to the aether, whereby any mass must respond to the field in which it exists in a proportional manner regardless of its mass.  This is demonstrated by two unequal masses falling at the same rate of acceleration.

It must be realized that energy and resistance are two completely different things, which work in opposition to each other.

Energy is a non-resistant force, in that an increase in energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, whereas mass is resistant in that an increase in mass affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

Likewise a decrease in energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy and an increase in mass.

The aether is the field itself in which any mass exists, and as such the underlying force of energy determines the condition of the aether or the field.

As the energy involves the dynamic potential of the aether, in relation to an accelerating field of frequency, a decrease in the acceleration of the field affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

And as the energy of any element is focused to the center of the atomic structure, the element with the smallest mass must have the highest potential of energy, in relation to a ratio of energy to mass.

It should be apparent that this explanation represents a direct contradiction to that which the equation E=MC2 is attempting to convey.  In other words, the equation E=MC2 is not a valid statement.  The energy represented by E is not energy at all, as energy has been confused with resistance.

This in itself would indicate that it would be exceedingly difficult to discover a method of extracting energy from the aether without knowing exactly what energy is.

Energy is a non-resistant underlying force in the form of non-linear time field frequency acceleration determining the form and function of physical structure.

The aether is the medium of non-linear time field frequency acceleration, in that both the aether and the field of frequency are one and the same.  The aether is not something separate from the field, as the aether is the field just as the field is the aether.

In this respect it would be impossible to extract energy from the aether, as the aether is not itself something separate from energy, as the energy and the aether or the field is one and the same thing.  You could not have energy without the aether or field, so in order to employ the energy of the aether the energy must be employed as a field function.

And in order to employ the energy of the aether as a field function requires a method by which to modulate the aether itself or to modulate the field itself, as the field and the aether refer to the same thing.

So whether we call it the aether or we call it the field, it is the field which we want to modulate in order to access the underlying energy of the field.

Every atom has a field, every planet has a field, every moon has a field and every star has a field etc. and the underlying energy of each field is different.

In other words, the ratio of energy to mass is different for every system.  And to be sure we understand what this means, we must realize that the ratio of energy to mass means that energy and mass are not the same thing at all.

Now, we’ll take this one step further, if we have a gram of gold, the average energy potential of each atom constituting the gram of gold can be said to be of a certain value.  But if we separate the individual atoms constituting the gram of gold the total energy potential of all the atoms will be greater than when they were combined as a one gram bar.

If we had two one gram bars of gold and combined them into one single bar weighing two grams, the two gram bar would have less energy than two one gram bars.

This is what is meant by a ratio of energy to mass, as an increase or decrease in mass changes the ratio of energy to mass.

I am hopeful that this explanation will make it a little easier to understand how to go about accessing an alternate energy source, as well as achieving gravity control.

© 2005 David Barclay

SETI's Search

2005-10-16T22:03:00.000-07:00

Although I have suggested that there might be a more efficient manner by which to intercept signals originating from space, those suggestions appear to have fallen on deaf ears.

At the present time we are confined to the field remaining relative to our planet, yet such a consideration appears to escape the notice of those who wish to perpetuate the myth of uniformity, as they insist that a signal from the stars might arrive at any moment.

If we are seeking a signal from an extraterrestrial source we might be in for a very long wait, as it would seem less than intelligent to anticipate the arrival of a signal which could only be sent from within the extremely narrow window of one’s own unified field system.

If we consider the dynamics of our unified field system, in relation to the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to our planet Earth, we will realize that a conventional radio signal beamed into space would be limited to the confines of the field from which it was sent.  This means that the signal is restricted to the condition of field remaining relative to our planet Earth.

In an equal manner a radio signal beamed into space from any planet, moon or extraterrestrial space craft would also be limited to the confines of the field from which it was sent, which means the signal is restricted to the condition of field remaining relative to the point of the signals origin.

Therefore the opportunity for such a signal to be received from any other location in space is so extremely remote that it is most unlikely to occur.  Unless of course the signal originates from a space craft we ourselves have sent into space.

It is the dynamics of inter field communication which confound those attempting to access extraterrestrial radio signals, as the science and technology required for inter field contact is not presently considered applicable and or necessary.

The existing situation here on our planet Earth could be explained by a simple analogy; such as a person, possessing a telephone which is not connected to a telephone system, awaiting their first incoming call.  They could wait for a very long time and still not receive a call.  But if they were to connect their telephone to an existing communications system they would immediately have contact with anyone connected to the system.

It might sound very simple and elementary, but it is not simple, even though it might be elementary.

All the extraterrestrial communications we might wish to intercept are taking place beyond the limits of our unified field system, which means we are not paying attention.

Considering the size of Universe one could easily anticipate extraterrestrial signals originating from millions of different stations.  But after years of listening we have yet to confirm contact with even one.  So, it would appear rational to consider that there might be something lacking in respect to our equipment, as opposed to doubting the existence of an extraterrestrial source of communication.

If we are to have contact with extraterrestrial intelligence existing beyond the limits of our unified field system we must have the equipment allowing inter-field contact to occur, which would require the development of a field frequency modulator.

A field frequency modulator would allow us full spectrum access in relation to the billions of unified field systems existing themselves as non-simultaneous conditions of Universe.

In other words, we would immediately have access to millions of signals originating from extraterrestrial sources.

Every unified field system exists independent of every other system, yet they are all inter-connected and inter-related through a simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to every system.  So it is through this simultaneous condition of Universe that we should be making contact, yet we fail to realize that such a thing might even be possible.

This means that simultaneous communication is not only possible but essential to the task, despite the fact that we perceive distant galaxies existing at distances described in terms corresponding to millions and billions of light years.

Inter-field communication might seem like an extremely radical idea, but it must be considered, as it is the only manner by which extraterrestrial contact is possible, in relation to a meaningful means of communication.

A field frequency modulator allows for the modulation of non-linear time field frequency acceleration, in that the rate of acceleration is different for every unified field system of Universe.  And keeping in mind that the rate of acceleration is of a non-absolute value, we are talking about a very wide range of modulation.

What we are talking about here is getting plugged in to the Universe and extending our boundaries beyond the relative limitations of a single system.

Of course simultaneous communication would appear to defy the existing rules of science, but this is not the case at all, it’s just that we don’t understand the rules.

We are reluctant to accept the idea that all systems of Universe maintain a non-uniform relationship, to the point where the evidence of non-uniformity is restricted to a classified status.  This means that evidence clearly defining the condition of non-uniformity is hidden and kept from public view, while the existence of such evidence is repeatedly denied.

Having seen such evidence myself I can assure you that it is far too real to be ignored.

The importance of non-uniformity is multiple in meaning, but for the purpose of this discussion it provides an understanding of our relative isolation within the field of planet Earth, as we are separated from the rest of Universe by a non-uniform boundary of field frequency.  And regardless of how far or how fast we might be able to travel by means of our existing aerospace technology we are presently restricted to a single unified field system.

This means that we are cut off from any and all interplanetary or intergalactic communications of extraterrestrial origin that might be in progress, other than those associated with our own terrestrial based communications.

If SETI were to employ a field frequency modulator in their effort to intercept an extraterrestrial signal they would be rewarded by not one but millions of signals originating from space.

The question would no longer be whether we are alone, but how discerning we might wish to be in relation to those with whom we would now have contact.

This is not to say that we would merely have the technical capability to listen to random signals, but that we would have the ability to instantaneously participate in two way communications.

Of course it sounds like science fiction, because we are conditioned to respond in disbelief.  And if you doubt that point, you only have to consider the limitations of conventional science in order to realize how restricted your view of Universe really is.

SETI is at least attempting to break the mold, but are restricted by a lack of science and technology.  Anyone attempting to make extraterrestrial contact must have the right science and the right technological tools to do the job.

This means getting it right, getting it straight and putting it to work, without the restrictions of denial.

We need to get on with the work of building for the future, because there is going to be a future whether we like it or not.  So let’s get past the pettiness and the greed and realize we do have a future.

© 2005 David Barclay & www.gravitycontrol.org

IS THE WORLD STILL FLAT?

2005-10-05T20:41:00.000-07:00

Imagine taking an exam, at one of our modern universities, where one of the questions asked is whether the Earth is flat or round.  And for this question you are given two choices; (A), the Earth is round or (B), the Earth is flat, where (B) was the correct answer.

On top of this you are asked to explain your answer in respect to the physical structure of the Earth, and should you choose to explain (A) you would automatically received a failing grade.

Of course this sounds outrageous, but no more outrageous than to be asked whether the speed of light is a constant or a variable, or to be asked  to determine the equatorial radius of the Earth in meters.

The radius of the Earth is currently explained in terms of what I refer to as flat plane geometry, which involves straight and curved lines intersecting at critical points, where the dimensions are denoted by values corresponding to linear terms of reference, such as Meters and Kilometers etc.

Considering that the Earth is not flat, the speed of light is not constant and the Earth is dynamically structured, it would seem outrageous to consider defining the equatorial radius of the Earth to equal an exact number of meters.

So, the thinking goes like this; we will allow for the Earth to be described as round, because we can no longer hide this fact, but we still insist that the Earth can be accurately defined in terms of metric measure just as the value of (c) can be defined in terms of an exact metric value remaining relative to the linear duration of a single second.

Oh my, what have we done?

On the basis of this rationalization we can just as easily say that the Earth is flat, as it would appear that most of the graduates from this modern university don’t know the difference anyway.

Is this true?  It would appear so, as none of them have questioned the legitimacy of the exercise or protested the absurdity of such claims.

The real question is this; how can the Earth be dynamically structured and still be defined in terms of metric measure, in that the metric measures correspond to static terms?

The Earth cannot be defined in terms of metric measure, as the dynamic nature of the Earth’s structure invalidates the static nature of the terms applied.

It is physically impossible to accurately measure the internal portion of the Earth in a manner corresponding to a metric value, as there is no absolute center from which to determine the radius.

But, someone will say that the measure of the Earth’s radius can be approximated, in that the approximate value is extremely close to the true value.

Sorry, it’s not even close.  As time accelerates to the center of field the radius of the Earth is continuously increasing relative to the rate of expansion at the non-absolute perimeter of Universe, which is an accelerative rate of expansion.

This is a situation like the one where you can’t have your cake and eat it too.  You either keep your cake or you eat it, but once you eat your cake you have no more cake to eat.

So, we say the world is round and not flat, but we will still allow the dimensions to correspond to a flat surface, despite the fact that we have already determined that the Earth is not flat.

But, I can measure the metric dimensions of a box, so why not the Earth?

The dimensions of the box remain relative to the condition of field, whereby the measurements allow for a convenient standard of value, but they do not themselves represent the dynamics of field.  In other words, the dimensions of the box correspond to a purely abstract idea and serve no purpose in attempting to analyze the dynamics of field.

We have attempted to bore into the surface of the Earth and found the task a very real challenge, as the energy of field increases with depth.  This means that the structural dynamics increase in magnitude with depth, whereby the boring of the rock becomes increasingly difficult with depth.
At a certain depth underground it becomes impossible to bore any deeper, as the structural strength of the field affecting the dynamic structure of the rock exceeds that of the boring tool.

It is not that the rock gets harder or more brittle with depth, but that it gets stronger, as the strength of the field increases to the center of field.

Even within the Earth’s central core where the physical matter is in the form of a gaseous mixture rarefied to the center of field in the form of hydrogen, the strength of the field is of an immense magnitude.

This of course is very fortunate, as it allows the structure of the Earth to remain fairly stable for extended periods of time without any fear of the Earth being shattered like a fine china cup.

It also explains the shallow impact craters on the Moon, as the underlying dynamics of the Moon’s crust are of a greater magnitude than those of the Earth’s crust.

But should the dynamic energy of a planetary body be reduced to a certain critical point, the impact of a single meteor could easily shatter the planetary body in a manner similar to a fine china cup being smashed to bits by the impact of a sledgehammer.

The non-linear acceleration of field focused to the center of field imparts an accelerative increase to the value of time, which in turn alters the value of space and motion remaining relative to the system of reference.

Therefore, we might visualize a row of metric rules extending from the surface of the Earth to the center of the Earth’s core, where each meter rule becomes proportionally shorter toward the core.  And those meter rules closest to the center of the core are so short that it is quite impossible to distinguish one from the other even with the aid of a magnifying glass.

Yet, on the basis of a dynamic field we want to believe that it should still be possible for each one meter rule to remain equal in length to every other one meter rule regardless of any changes occurring in respect to the condition of field.

Oh boy, are we in trouble.
It would seem that there must be some hidden purpose in maintaining this outdated concept, which might be somewhat similar to the situation where a flat Earth prevented most people from venturing too far from home.

Does the linearization of time, space and motion not prevent us from realizing the accessibility of space, as we are convinced that the stars are too far removed from our geographical location to allow for interstellar transport?  And if we cannot travel to the stars, would it not be equally impossible for people to travel from the stars?

Therefore it would seem reasonable to laugh at the suggestion that our Earth might be visited by travelers from other worlds.  Such a thing deserves to be laughed at, as everyone knows that the constancy of light speed prevents such a thing from being seriously considered as a rational idea.

The trick is to allow people to believe that the knowledge of the world is an open book, whereby they will not even consider the possibility of the available knowledge being contrived for the purpose of control.  And in order for such a trick to work you must also convince the majority of the people that it would be impossible to manipulate or hide scientific knowledge.

Nonetheless, scientific knowledge is manipulated and contrived for the purpose of control.

It is the responsibility of every scientist to question the validity of an unreasonable assumption of fact.  But be that as it may, it is the orderly appearance of discord that compels so many to believe a lie.

For the whole story go to www.gravitycontrol.org

© 2005 by David Barclay and Gravity Control

ENERGY

2005-10-02T20:41:00.000-07:00

If we are going to develop New Energy we should at least know what energy is, as at the present time we seem to be walking around in a fog.

Everything we call energy corresponds to a factor of resistance applied against the accelerative energy of field, which means that we are doing work by the most difficult means possible.

We seem to have this idea that if we shove, push or pull something we are applying energy to the situation, but we are not doing anything of the kind, as all forms of work involve a factor of resistance acting against the field in which the work is being done, whereby no energy is applied in our effort to perform work.

So, what difference does it make what you call it as long as the work gets done?  It really doesn’t matter at all if you are satisfied with the existing situation, but if you want to find a simple method to access the free energy of Universe you should at least know what energy is.

To understand this situation we can use the example of a waterwheel, in relation to the flow of a stream providing the power required to turn the waterwheel.

Most of us would say that the water provided the necessary energy required, as the water, affected by gravity, pushes against the paddles of the wheel, whereby causing the wheel to turn.

But, the flow of the water applies no energy to the paddles, nor do the paddles convey energy to the wheel.

If we consider the flow of the water to be the result of gravity, we must also understand that the water itself is resistant to gravity, in that gravity is a condition of field.  And in this respect it is the continuous acceleration of the underlying field symmetrically focused to the center of field which causes the water to flow downstream.

Therefore there is a dynamic relationship existing between the water and the field, where the energy of field is acceleratively increasing relative to the dynamic energy potential of the water.
In this relationship the water is obliged to follow the path of least resistance, which is downstream, whereby every obstruction to the flow of the water applies resistance to the flow.

Therefore the water is resistant to the paddles of the wheel while the paddles are resistant to the flow of the water, which effectively slows the rate of flow.

This slowing of the water relative to the field in which the water is flowing causes an increase in the underlying energy potential of the water molecules.

But at the same time the resistance of the water against the paddles causes a decrease in the underlying energy of the paddles relative to an increase in the underlying energy of the water, as the flow of the water causes the paddles to move in the direction of the flow.

The water adds no energy to the wheel or to the paddles, but in fact causes the paddles and the wheel to suffer a loss of energy, which causes the wheel to turn.

The most amazing thing about this situation is that a turning wheel has less energy than one which remains relatively stationary.  So a turning wheel is subject to a loss of energy and an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy, which explains why machinery wears out.

What is equally amazing is the fact that should the water molecules possess sufficient energy the water would not flow at all, whereby there would be insufficient resistance to turn the wheel.

So, it would appear that we have things somewhat confused and slightly back to front in relation of our existing perception of energy.

To take this one step further we can consider the use of a water driven turbine to produce electrical power, where the turning of the turbine adds no energy to the grid but in fact affects a net loss of energy and a proportional increase in resistance.

How this new perception of energy might be of assistance, is in helping us to realize the true nature and importance of an underlying force of energy, which we have yet to employ for the purpose of our industry.

Whether we use coal, wood or gas we are still faced with the same situation, as none of these resource based products supply us with any energy, as their continued usage results in a net loss of energy affecting our environment.

The same is true in relation to the use of uranium to power a nuclear reactor, as the process adds no energy.  In fact we have yet to develop a method by which to employ energy for the purpose of our industry.

So where do we start?

We can begin by realizing that a stationary wheel has a higher energy potential than one which is turning, which gives us some clue as to the nature of an energy producing process.

So the quest for new energy is not simply a matter of building a better mouse trap, but involves the reinvention of the wheel.

I hope that some of you might have a little light turning on inside your head, as we are talking about a very significant jump from push and grind to high tech dynamics.   And that is quite a jump.

A truly non-linear drive system capable of affecting an increase in the underlying energy potential of the system itself is not going to involve the turning of wheels, but will involve the focusing of wheels relative to a central axis.

I have watched with interest as the foil lifters, subject to 50,000 volts, are forced to defy gravity, in respect to the idea that these experimental projects might lead to a system allowing for the control of gravity.

It would appear that the inventors have not sufficiently considered the dynamics involved in the process of gravity control; otherwise they would have already realized that the often repeated demonstrations do not involve a process by which to actually control gravity.

Gravity control involves the controlled modulation of the underlying dynamics of the system itself, where the system represents a relative unified field system existing relative to the field in which it exists.   And as such the system itself, in relation to the underlying dynamics of the system’s unified field, exists as a relative system of reference.

Therefore, the modulation of a gravity control system must occur within the context of the internal dynamics of the system itself, whereby affecting the inverse responses corresponding to the external dynamics.

Attempting to affect the internal dynamics from outside or from the external portion of field can only affect a temporary response, as it is only due to the external application of an electrical charge that the internal dynamics respond at all.  Once the source of power is disconnected the field reverts to its original dynamic state, which terminates the demonstration.

The externally applied charge is of a resistant nature, which temporarily affects an internal increase in energy relative to the field in which the lifter is situated, which is somewhat similar to looking through a magnifying glass at an ant.

The glass lens modulates the field existing relative to the lens without altering the condition of the field itself, whereby the ant appears both larger and closer to the point of observation.  But once the lens is removed the ant appears smaller and further removed from the point of observation.

This means that you can look at ants through a lens as often as you want and the results are going to be pretty much the same every time, as the focus of the lens is set relative to the field in which it is being employed.  So in order to modulate the field existing relative to the angle of the lens, in a controlled manner, requires you to be able to control the focus of the lens.

In relation to a single lens and or a lifter you do not have the ability to modulate the condition of field remaining relative to the lifter in a controlled manner.  Therefore, you must realize that, regardless of how many times you demonstrate the amazing lifter, the results are going to remain very predictable and somewhat repetitious.

In terms of gravity control, it is extremely doubtful that remote control is possible, as the system itself which provides for gravity control exists in a non-uniform relationship relative to the field in which it is being observed.  In other words the condition of space, time and motion remaining relative to the gravity control system is different than the space, time and motion remaining relative to the observer on the ground or in the air.

The same is true for any apparatus which demonstrates an antigravity affect, as without a system of control you have not achieved gravity control.

In other words, simply applying an electrical charge or an electrostatic charge to a devise does not demonstrate gravity control nor represent the necessary proof of principle.

This is not to suggest that such experiments are without merit or importance, in attempting to understand the principles involved, because they most certainly are important.  But we still have a long way to go and the need for research and development is critical to any further progress.

In fact the existing need for research and development is paramount to success, as without it, this is as far as it goes.

However, in terms of energy and resistance, it is of great importance that we not only realize that gravity control cannot be achieved by the induction of an electrical charge, but that gravity control will itself affect an electrical charge.

Therefore an electrical charge is achieved through a differential in the dynamic potential of the modulating system relative to the field in which it exists.

In other words, gravity control provides for more than just an efficient means of transport, as this same process is capable of providing the electrical power required for all our human industry.

To learn more read some of the early posts on this blog, or check out the Gravity Control Blog located at www.gravitycontrol.org or go to the gravity control forum.  You will also find references and links to other interesting web sites at www.gravitycontrol.org

Light Speed Reconsidered

2005-10-02T17:58:00.000-07:00

Light Speed Reconsidered, by David Barclay

One of the most basic principles associated with our modern physics is the constancy of light speed, which is presently determined to be exactly 299,792,458 meters per second.  And if this principle is ever found to be in error, it will profoundly effect on our perception of Universe.

So it is of some importance that we should consider the possibility that our understanding of light speed is not absolutely certain, but questionable at best.

Without making any biased assumptions we might question the validity of employing two completely different linear terms of reference to determine a third, in respect to the concept of attempting to combine oranges and apples in order to establish the perception of a banana.

On top of this we might question the validity of employing single unit measure in attempting to determine an exact value, as no single unit of measure corresponds to an absolute value.  This means that our value of light speed is at best an estimate and an estimate is something less than an exact value.

Also, we assume that light speed is a linear function, in that light travels through space in a manner similar to a train in motion on a track or a plane in motion in the sky.  If this is true, it requires the light to be in motion independent of the field in which it exists, which means that the speed of light is different than the motion of the field in which the light is moving.

This of course requires the motion of the light to function independent of the dynamics determining the condition of field, which makes one wonder what it is then that determines the speed of light?

If we consider all the various factors involved in determining the exact speed of light we are forced to conclude that the speed of light must remain static, as it is determined on the basis of two apparently static terms of reference, which includes the duration of one second and the length of one meter.

And on the basis of this we further conclude that it should be possible to determine the approximate age and size of Universe.

2

Oh my goodness, this is a strange state of affairs, as we have gone to great lengths to make such an evaluation seem completely rational and somewhat logical, without considering the possibility that such an idea is less than rational and even less than logical.

Considering we now know that the Universe exists in a dynamic state and is no longer considered static, why on Earth would we persist in attempting to maintain the correctness of an outdated concept?

Would we not consider that the apparent motion of light must also be dynamic and as such must therefore correspond to the dynamic condition of field?

This situation would cause us to realize that the second and the meter could hardly be considered static either, as both of these standards must fluctuate with the condition of field, whereby the speed of light could hardly remain static or even constant over time.

Of course someone could suggest that this is impossible, but the experimental evidence says that it is possible and a proven fact.

How else could you explain the Frozen Light Experiment, where a light pulse is slowed to a full stop and made to vanish only to reappear and regain its original speed?

We are not talking trains and planes here, as you can bring a train to a full stop, but just try making it vanish, reappear and continue under its own steam down the track.

Now we are into the realm of non-linear dynamics without even realizing that we were from the start, as the apparent linear motion of light is in fact due to the dynamic non-linear nature of the field in which it exists, otherwise the light would not be in motion at all.

We have concocted a great story on the basis of some crude assumptions that appear to correspond to linear geometry, but linear geometry was never intended to describe the dimensions of space.

3

So, when we consider the size and age of Universe we must equally consider the terms of reference employed, as we can easily fool ourselves without due consideration and vigilance.

In making reference to billions of light years we are assuming a great deal, as we assume it might be possible to determine the duration of a light year and or the length of a light year, when in fact we are still incapable of determining the exact speed of light other than as a hypothetical exercise involving static terms of reference which are themselves nothing more or less than an abstract invention.

Consequently no meaningful information can be derived from this exercise, as it has no practical application other than to limit our understanding of Universe.

If we consider the Universe in terms of a dynamic non-simultaneous condition remaining relative to the system of reference, we will realize that our observation of distant galaxies, as seen through the Hubble, gives us a clue to the nature of Universe.

In order to take a photograph of an extremely distant galaxy requires that time should be slowed in the direction of our observation and if time is slowed in the direction of our observation it would be impossible for the speed of light to remain constant over the course of billions of years.

If time is isometrically slowed in the direction of deep space and is symmetrically accelerated in the direction of the observer, in relation to a dynamic condition, it would appear the distance is somewhat less than what we presently assume.

It is obvious that the light from a distant galaxy is not in linear motion; otherwise we would be instantly blinded by the light.  And if the light is not in linear motion our perception of Universe is equally blinded by our determination to maintain our existing assumptions.

So how big is the Universe and how old is it?

4

The Universe is a dynamic condition of space, time and motion which remains relative to our planet Earth, so the duration of Universe and the size of Universe cannot be determined on the basis of a linear assessment.

One can only photograph a distant galaxy in the context of the non-absolute present moment; consequently the subject of the photograph, which is a distant galaxy, must exist in the same non-absolute moment in which the photograph is taken.

This would indicate that the distance between the observer and the distant galaxy is not a linear expanse of space, which can be measured in terms of meters and or seconds, but corresponds to a differential in field frequency and or a differential in the dynamic (energy) potential remaining relative to the system of reference.

Therefore the lens of the Hubble has modulated the differential of the field remaining relative to its curvature, whereby the distant galaxy has been etched into the photographic medium by means of field frequency distortion corresponding to a potential of resistance associated with a differential in dynamic potential.

The only space existing between the Earth and the distant galaxy corresponds to a differential in dynamic potential and has nothing whatever to do with the linear speed of light, as the space itself is a condition of field which remains relative to the system of reference.

There are no light years or astronomical units per say, there is only a differential in dynamic potential, whereby the field of frequency accelerates in the direction of the Earth and isometrically decelerates into space.

The condition of space is determined by the underlying dynamics of field remaining relative to the system of reference.  So as the relative differential in dynamic potential increases so does the Universe continue to expand.

Consequently, if the relative differential in dynamic potential were decreasing the Universe would continue to contract, but in this respect the factor of time would not be reversed, merely slowed toward the system of reference and isometrically accelerated into space.
5

From this we can conclude that the speed of light is a field condition, associated with every system of reference, whereby the speed of light is different for every system of reference and should be considered a relative variable remaining relative to the system of reference.

Our existing concept of light speed, as a constant, defies rational logic and limits our human potential to comprehend the nature of Universe.

For more information go to www.gravitycontrol.org

© 2005, David Barclay & Gravity Control. org

How many meters?

2005-08-23T22:11:00.000-07:00

How Many Meters

I was reading a science magazine about the amazing sights seen through the Hubble and noticed a comment regarding some of the pictures being events having occurred billions of years ago. My immediate response was to say, really, you took a picture of something that happened billions of years ago, what a cool trick.

Now, most people take billions of light years at face value, in that a distant galaxy is in fact situated billions of light years from the Hubble, but is it?

I don't believe in light years, in fact I insist that light is not even in linear motion and if light is not moving like a train or a plane how could it travel all the way from the far reaches of space? The short answer is that it doesn't.

What you see is what you get and that's it, as there are no billions of light years to even consider.

But on the forum Jim brought up an interesting point about the speed of gravity versus light speed, in respect to the question of whether gravity travels faster than light speed, as when the gravity of the sun is checked out, the sun is situated 8 min. ahead of where we see it located, which is thought to be due to the idea that the image of the sun takes 8 min. to reach us traveling at the speed of light, whereas the speed of gravity might be considered instantaneous or faster than the speed of light.

In that time slows isometrically from the center of the Earth and accelerates symmetrically to the center of the Earth, there is a difference between the distance to the sun from the Earth and the distance from the sun to the Earth, as the two are not the same at all. The shorter distance is from the sun to the Earth, with the Earth as the system of reference.

But if you were to reverse the process whereby it might be possible to have the sun as your system of reference, the shorter distance would be from the Earth to the sun.

Consequently there is a differential in dynamic potential existing between the Earth and the sun, with the sun having the higher dynamic potential, which maintains the space between them and their relative motion to each other.

In this respect the sun is moving away from the Earth faster than the Earth is moving away from the sun, while at the same time the sun is expanding faster than the Earth, so we notice very little difference in the size of the sun.

Like light, gravity doesn't move linearly through space, as gravity is a dynamic condition of field which is decreasing in proportion to the acceleration of field.

Gravity decreases in proportion to the square of the distance as does light diminish from it's source in the same manner.

So the differential between the Earth and the sun is roughly 8 min., relative to the Earth as our system of reference, which is continuously increasing.
But when we measure the gravity of the sun, we are measuring the gravity of the sun and not a differential in dynamic potential, so there is no differential to measure.

We must realize that the condition of the sun affects the suns field, as a unified field of frequency, which means the continuous acceleration of the sun's field affects an instantaneous increase in the expansion of Universe remaining relative to the sun, in the same manner as the condition of the Earth's field, as a unified field of frequency, which means that the continuous acceleration of the Earth's field affects an instantaneous increase in the expansion of Universe remaining relative to the Earth. But both conditions and both rates of expansion are different.

To clear up any misunderstanding about light traveling from the depths of space we can consider the basic concept of vision, in that it is assumed that light enters the eye. Whoa, would that be painful or what, as you'd be blinded in the process.

Light does not enter the eye, as the eye is a field frequency receptor which is intended to provide us with sight adequate to our survival. So vision is a lot like memory, in that both the field of vision and the content of memory exist as field frequency.

So it does not require light to be in linear motion to be received by the eye, just as memory is not in linear motion, whereby we can remember a memory as often as we wish for many years. But we have this crazy idea that memory is embedded in the fabric of our brains, but just how that works no one is quite sure. And of course memory is not trapped in our brain, otherwise we would run out of storage space and require an auxiliary brain.

So when we look into deep space we see what exists relative to the Earth as our system of reference. And even in space, despite our limited understanding of space, we remain within the field of the Earth.

A distant galaxy seen through the Hubble exists relative to our Earth at the present time and does not exist billions of years ago, as it exists in the present relative to the Earth as it is. The billions of years are pure fiction, they don't exist.

The lens of the Hubble modulates the condition of space relative to the Earth, which gives us these fantastic pictures of distant galaxies, but it does not involve billions of light years. What it does involve is a differential in dynamic potential remaining relative to our planet Earth, which is not the same thing at all.

You can't measure space with a meter rule or a yard stick, as the meter rule and the yard stick get longer as you move deeper into space, just as the second becomes longer as you move deeper into space, which means you wont reach your distant galaxy.

But coming the other way the meter rule gets shorter and the second gets shorter, which makes the return trip shorter than the out bound voyage, which is why the Earth looks so big from the moon. The two distances are not the same, as the distance from the Earth to the moon is longer and the distance from the moon to the Earth is shorter relative to the field of the Earth.

So the distance involved is a differential in dynamic potential and has nothing to do with meter rules or yard sticks, nor does it have anything to do with the speed of light or light years.

To attempt to defend the idea of light speed being constant requires some fictional information to be injected, as the speed of light is a relative variable at best.

The apparent speed of light is a condition of the field in which the light is perceived to be in linear motion, but it is not the light which is in motion as it is the field itself which is accelerating, but not going anywhere other than expanding or contracting.

The linear motion of a planet, moon or star is a very serious occurrence as this really upsets the harmony of Universe. In fact the linear motion of the Earth in any direction would bring about global disaster.

So while we're at it why don't we consider the dynamic differential between the sun and Mars, as this differential suggests that Mars should be closer to the sun. This means that Mars has at some time in the past been displaced from it's original orbit, which means there is a very real potential for further restructuring of the solar field.

Time is different for every system of Universe, of course it is, but there is no known means by which to determine the linear dimensions of Universe, despite what anyone might like to believe.

There is a different non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to every system of Universe, each of which is expanding or contracting at a different rate. And each and every one of these conditions is equally valid in terms of the real deal, as the physical condition of Universe is a dynamic condition remaining relative to the system of reference.

This allows both past and future conditions of Universe to exist simultaneously and remain relative to the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to the system of reference, whereby there are an infinite number of conditions existing simultaneously. Therefore no one condition is any more real than another, as they are all equally real.

I suppose the people who think they can take pictures of events having occurred billions of years ago are the same people who think rockets are going to get us to the stars. Yet if you asked these same people if the condition of the moon existing relative to the Earth was a historical condition of the moon or a future condition of the moon, they would say neither one. They would say that the condition of the moon was contemporary with that of the Earth.

Unfortunately they would be wrong, as the existing condition of the moon, which remains relative to the Earth, is a historic condition of the moon existing relative to the present condition of the Earth. Yet the moon is our closest neighbor.

Time is not the result of space and motion, but space and motion are the result of time, in relation to a non-linear evaluation of time field frequency acceleration.
And meter rules have nothing to do with it, nor does the linear speed of light.

Why We Need Gravity Control

2005-08-07T18:38:00.000-07:00

For some time I have been bothered by the confusion surrounding the apparent slowing of NASA's Pioneer 10 and 11 space probes, which are presently traveling in deep space billions of kilometers from Earth.

Many reasons have been put forward in attempting to explain the slowing of these space craft, but nothing which has yet been accepted as conclusive. Yet, it would seem there is a very serious lesson to be learned from Pioneer 10 and 11.

You can't get there from here! Well, at least it appears that way, but one thing is for certain, you can't get there this way, which is by means of linear transit.

As NASA knows little or nothing about the underlying dynamics of space, it would seem natural that they would spend tens of millions of dollars in attempting to solve a problem and come up with nothing to show for it, other than to rule out some of the apparent possibilities.

When we apply the underlying dynamics of (ntffa), about which there is plenty of information on this blog, we find that time slows isometrically from the center of the Earth's core to the outer boundary of Universe.

So let's consider these underlying dynamics in relation to the slowing of Pioneer 10 & 11.

For starters NASA is applying metric measure to the problem, which is a linear system. Unfortunately Universe is not linear, especially space.

The idea is that these two space craft might eventually reach the nearest stars, but here is the problem. They are traveling in an expanding field which remains relative to our planet Earth, which means that for each meter they advance the next meter is a little bit longer than the last. So the distance is increasing as they proceed, whereby they are not slowing down at all, it's just that space is expanding. Space is being stretched in the direction of travel, which is away from the Earth. So the apparent progress of Pioneer 10 & 11 is slowed.

At the same time, time itself relative to our Earth is isometrically slowing down, so the duration of time required to make the journey to the stars is increasing as the two craft move further away from the Earth.

NASA appears to be at a loss in relation to their understanding of space, as you cannot calculate the vastness of space by employing metric measure, as a meter rule corresponds to a static term of measure and or a linear term of reference, while space is a dynamic condition which remains relative to the system of reference. And in relation to Pioneer 10 & 11 the system of reference is planet Earth.

So, space exists as a condition of field and rather than attempting to modulate the condition of field NASA is attempting to physically cross deep space and access the stars by means of a push cart type craft, which simply wont do the job.

This is why comets keep coming back, as they reach a point where the underlying dynamics force them to return. Their progress finally comes to a virtual halt and the field dynamics cause the comet to follow the path of least resistance, which is back towards the sun.

Gravity really doesn't play a role in this at all, as it is the underlying field dynamics determining the direction in which the path of least resistance runs.

It is commonly assumed that the gravity of the sun draws a comet toward it, but the gravity of the sun is far too weak to be effective in this manner, but nonetheless the field dynamics of the sun are extremely high, in terms of (ntffa). So, comets which return to the sun are somehow associated with the sun's dynamics, as they exist relative to the field of the sun and not the field of the Earth.

From this we can determine that Pioneer 10 or 11 will not do the job intended, as they will eventually be brought to a virtual halt and begin a return trip to Earth, as these two space craft exist relative to the field of the Earth and not the field of the sun. Surprise, surprise NASA!

Consequently they will make the return trip, circle the Earth and be hurled back into space or burn up in the Earth's atmosphere.

How long it will be before these two space craft start their return trip is an unknown at this time, but they will eventually do so, or break up trying.

The basic idea that we can measure the vastness of space in terms of light years or any other linear term is a fallacy, it's pure nonsense.

You cannot apply linear terms to a dynamic system, you can only employ such terms on a very limited scale, such as measuring the distance from the bedroom to the kitchen or the distance from one town to another, but you cannot employ linear terms to measure space as space does not conform to such terms.

So how big is the Universe? It is no bigger than the non-absolute differential in (ntffa) remaining relative to the system of reference, which is less than one and more than zero. You can say the Universe is vast, but you cannot say how big it is in relation to the concept of light years.

If space keeps expanding with distance, the relative value of the linear terms employed increases as you go further into space, which means it would be impossible to get very far in relation to the vastness of space. The dynamics of space will simply overwhelm your effort and send you home.

The only way to access the far reaches of space is to modulate the underlying dynamics of field, which is commonly referred to as gravity control, electrogravitics or anti-gravity etc. But gravity control itself is only a start, as it is the modulation of the underlying field dynamics which is required. In other words, it is the total dynamics of field which must be modulated in a controlled manner.

The craft itself must exist as a unified field of frequency, whereby the Universe exists relative to the craft itself, which is something completely different from anything we have previously attempted. The controlled modulation of the underlying field dynamics allows one to modulate the condition of Universe remaining relative to the craft, which allows one to overcome the obstacles which presently frustrate our efforts.

If we are to make it to the stars, where we can actually access Earth like planets, which undoubtedly exist, we must get off the pot and get on with it. Fooling around with outdated and inadequate concepts is not progressive or rational. We have to get passed the rockets and get serious.

Gravity control is what this blog is all about and it's a start in the right direction, but there is still a lot of work to be done. No one person or even a small group of people can make this happen, as it is going to take a major effort to get it off the ground. It's going to take cooperation and commitment to make it happen, but it can happen and of course it will, but when? If not now, when?

It's as much about waking to a new day as anything could be and this is the dawn and a new day is breaking, so wake up you sleepy heads and join us in a very exciting adventure.

Antigravity

2005-07-01T15:52:00.000-07:00

Antigravity by itself would merely affect a decrease in the weight of a mass, relative to the field in which the mass exists. But, if we could effectively control antigravity we could lift any mass and deliver it to any location on the planet as though it were securely packed in cotton wool.

In other words, an apparatus capable of controlling antigravity would allow us to move the most massive object from one place to another without any difficulty whatsoever. Whether across the oceans or over the highest mountains, no geographic location would be excluded from the benefits of controlled antigravity.

In common terms of understanding, antigravity is the opposite of gravity, as antigravity is an inverse process of gravity.

As gravity is a dynamic condition of field, it is not necessary to change the field in which the mass exists in order for antigravity to lift the mass into the air. But what is necessary is a separate unified field system capable of modulating it's own field, in a controlled manner, relative to the field in which it exists.

In other words, there are two relative field systems, in relation to a unified field within a unified field, whereby the second field, which can be modulated in a controlled manner, can provide an antigravitational response relative to the Earth's field while the gravity of the Earth remains unaffected.

So a system capable of antigravity can function within the field of the Earth, where it takes advantage of the Earth's gravity to affect antigravity.

The field of the antigravity devise is not reversed relative to the field of the Earth, such is the case where two opposite magnetic poles attract and two like poles repel. As in the case of an antigravity devise, antigravity is the affect of an increased underlying energy potential associated with the devise relative to the energy potential of the field in which the device exists.

To make this easy to understand, consider a balloon filled with hydrogen gas which rises effortlessly into the sky, as it is the underlying energy potential of the hydrogen which makes this antigravity demonstration possible.

And certainly the hydrogen is lighter than air, but only because it has such a high underlying potential of energy relative to the field in which it exists.

The hydrogen balloon is following the path of least resistance, which happens to be up rather than down. So we would be quite correct to classify the hydrogen balloon as an antigravity device, just as we can classify the Moon as an antigravity device.

The underlying energy potential of the Moon is higher than that of the Earth, and as the underlying dynamic energy (ntffa) of the Moon is continuously accelerating faster than that of the Earth, the Moon continues to slowly move away from the Earth, despite our seemingly flawed perception of there being a gravitational attraction between the Earth and the Moon.

But it would be wrong to think that antigravity involves gravitational repulsion per say, as this would give us a false sense of the condition associated with antigravity.

Antigravity is simply a matter of affecting a differential in dynamic potential, in that a mass having a higher energy potential than that of the field in which it exists will rise, whereas a mass having a lower energy potential than the field in which it exists will fall.

But remember that we are talking about an underlying force of energy in terms of non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

So, we can conclude that antigravity is a process affected by an increase in the underlying energy of a unified field of frequency.

The Values

2005-06-29T21:58:00.000-07:00

In relation to gravity control, in respect to a unified field of frequency which can be modulated in a controlled manner, whereby affecting a gravitational response and an electromagnetic response, it is important to understand the relative limitations of any unified field system.

Perhaps the best example I can employ for this purpose is light speed, in terms of C, in that C is considered a relative constant.

But in determining the value of C we employ single units of measure corresponding to scalar values. And in doing so we attempt to linearize the condition of space, time and motion.

In relation to the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to our planet Earth, light exists as a condition of field where the condition of field is determined by an underlying dynamic force I define in terms of Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa).

This gives us the existing condition of Universe, in terms of a non-absolute upper and lower limit corresponding to the condition of field as determined by (ntffa), where the non-absolute upper limit can be described as having a value of 1 (one) and the non-absolute lower limit having a value of 0 (zero).

So, anything between 1 and 0 or 0 and 1 can be considered a relative value corresponding to the condition of field, therefore the value of C cannot exceed 1 or drop below 0, because if it does the light will vanish from the non-simultaneous condition of Universe and remain confined to the simultaneous condition of Universe which exists beyond the relative limits of the non-absolute present moment, which has been experimentally demonstrated.

However, we persist in attempting to maintain the popular concept of a linear perception and in doing so defeat ourselves in attempting to comprehend the nature of Universe.

This allows the oil companies to measure out a limited supply of gasoline without considering the fallacy of the situation, as no two gallons are equal, as each gallon is slightly smaller or larger than any other.
The simple exercise of attempting to make an absolute measurement of anything is a futile and impossible task.

Yet, on the basis of this we find general agreement in respect to the value of C being exactly 299,792,458 meters per second.

In reality we have not measured the speed of light, but measured a reflective distortion of space corresponding to a linear evaluation of time and space, which we assume adequate to our needs in determining a relative constant.

But in doing so we completely miss the boat, as we remain oblivious to the constant acceleration of time remaining relative to the system of reference. And if time is continuously accelerating the condition of field must be continuously changing, whereby the Universe continues to expand.

Therefore, our linear standards of value cannot supply us with any useful information, beyond the general scope of trade and commerce, where there is a requirement for convenient business standards.

In relation to the value of C, we have set the value of C in an artificial manner, which in fact standardizes our evaluation of Universe to fit the current agenda, which is to maintain the validity of single unit measure. In other words, scalar values are the authorized norm.

The scalar evaluation of time puts us at a very real disadvantage, as it rigs the game, whereby we run in circles measuring this and that without realizing that the values are continuously changing.

If time is accelerating, the value of C has to be considered a relative variable and not a constant. Therefore the value of time is different for every system of reference, whereby each element has a different value of time, which is why the various elements are different.

Different conditions produce different results in relation to form and function, which in fact simplifies things considerably, as this allows a reasonable explanation for the continuance of physical structure. The continuous acceleration of time allows for a continuance of physical structure, whereby the only thing which remains constant is the dynamic nature of Universe, which is expanding relative to our system of reference.

The idea of achieving gravity control could have or should have been accomplished some time ago, but we have remained blind to the obvious.

It would appear that the condition of field remaining relative to the Earth is different than the condition of field remaining relative to the Moon, so it is the condition of field which determines the gravitational relationship between one system and another. But if we are restrained by linear proportions corresponding to scalar values we assume that the weight of a mass is determined by gravity, where we describe gravity as a weak force.

And if gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but merely a dynamic response to the condition of field as determined by (ntffa), the only thing we need to do in order to achieve gravity control is build a unified field system capable of modulating the underlying dynamic force of (ntffa) in a controlled manner.

And considering that the only force allowing for the condition of our Earth is (ntffa), it should be equally obvious that our Earth is not fueled in some mysterious manner by a liquid, solid or gas. And if (ntffa) can provide for the Earth's apparently stable motion around the Sun, it should not be too difficult to adapt this concept to an aerospace system.

We must get over the habit of employing linear terms of reference for the purpose of science and scientific inquiry, as they are not applicable to the purpose.

If a mass is in motion, it is in motion relative to the system of reference, whereby a mass which is linearly accelerating must be non-linearly decelerating relative to the system of reference, but if a mass is linearly decelerating it must be non-linearly accelerating relative to the system of reference.

In other words, the linear acceleration of a mass decreases the underlying energy of the mass, while the linear deceleration of a mass increases the underlying energy of the mass. Therefore we have a proportional relationship of energy to mass, in terms of a ratio of energy per unit of mass.

The Earth is decelerating and it's underlying energy is increasing, but because the Moon is decelerating more rapidly than the Earth the Moon's underlying energy is increasing faster than that of the Earth, which causes the Moon to move away from the Earth faster than the Earth is moving away from the Moon. Therefore the Moon has the higher underlying dynamic energy potential even though it is much smaller than the Earth.

The smaller unit of mass has the higher ratio of (ntffa), in relation to a relative ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Therefore the apparently continuous expansion of Universe is due to a dynamic differential in (ntffa) remaining relative to the system of reference, as the lower limit of (ntffa) is situated at the perimeter of field, while the upper limit of (ntffa) is situated at the center of the Earth's field.

This differential is so great that the relative rate of expansion is very close to the upper limit of 1 existing at the center of field relative to the lower limit of 0 existing at the perimeter of field, in relation to a unified field system.

In other words, the past is receding isometrically from the center of field, while the future is focused symmetrically to the center of field. So, the expansion of Universe has nothing to do with gravity, as the expansion is a condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

The expansion is not linear expansion, as the expansion is a non-linear relative consideration, which continues to accelerate relative to the upper limit of (ntffa) remaining relative to the system of reference.

And as long as the relative rate of acceleration continues to increase the rate of expansion will continue to increase in a proportional manner. Therefore, the value of C must continue to increase as the upper and lower limit of (ntffa) continue to increase, which indicates that the value of C is not a limiting factor in respect to our potential access to the far reaches of space.

Evidence & Clues

2005-06-22T00:39:00.000-07:00

During my search I have come across a few examples which appear to validate the idea of (ntffa) increasing to the center of the Earth.

The first one is an underground horticultural nursery near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, located at a depth of 1400 meters underground, within the Creighton Mine.

At this underground site a variety of different plant species have been successfully cultivated, including vegetables, flowers and trees.

Grow lights are employed, as well as soil brought from surface sites.

The lights are turned off and on by a timed switching system as all plants require a period of night and day, where the plants rest during the period of darkness.

Not only do the various plant species thrive underground, but experience a 400% increase in their rate of growth. In other words the rate of growth is accelerated by 400%.

In relation to Jack Pine, the seeds are planted underground, where they germinate and grow for a period of 4 to 5 months. At the end of this short period a 2 year old seedling has developed.

All other plant species grow at a similar rate of acceleration. And in the case of flowers, such as roses and carnations, the colors of the flowers are vivid and well defined.

When these plants are transplanted to surface sites they revert to a normal rate of growth, but are found to be more robust and have a higher survival rate than plants started at surface. Furthermore, plants started underground and transplanted to surface are more resistant to disease and infestation than plants started at surface sites.

Results such as this cannot be duplicated at surface, even when state of the art greenhouse technology is employed.

Another underground horticultural nursery is located in the mine at Flin Flon, Manitoba, Canada, at a depth of 365 meters. Similar results are obtained, but due to the shallow depth of this site the rate of acceleration is proportionally reduced.

The second example is found around undersea hydro thermal vents, where heated water percolates from deep within the Earth. And in this instance the percolating water contains particles of rock and mineral in solution, which originated deep below the sea floor.

Here we find accelerated growth in marine life, which is effected by the percolating solution. Also, dead marine life in the immediate area of a hydro thermal vent is highly resistant to decay, which suggests that the highly energized solution affects the cellular dynamics of the marine life in a positive manner.

It should be noted that this accelerated growth is uniform, in that the plants grown underground and the marine life growing around hydro thermal vents is not genetically altered in any way.

The particles of rock and mineral in solution retain their higher dynamic state, just as the host rock of underground mine sites exists in a higher dynamic state than found at surface.

I would suggest that these two examples indicate that the rate of (ntffa) increases with depth underground, whether under the surface of the Earth or beneath the ocean floor.

In relation to experimental bore holes, it has been found that temperature increases with depth underground, but at a certain point the temperature starts to drop off or decrease with even further increases in depth underground. This seems to indicate that the temperature at the center of the Earth could be very cool, if not very cold.

It has also been found that gravity increases with depth, in that deep bore holes bear this out. But it must be noted that a bore hole extends the external condition of field and does not access the internal portion of field, as the internal portion of field is always on the inside and never on the outside.

Yet, the highly energized host rock affects the growth of plants grown underground, despite the underground site being an extension of the external field, as is any hole in the ground.

These two examples would suggest that the underlying force described in terms of (ntffa) does symmetrically increase to the center of the Earth.

It would appear that we might become somewhat confused if we did not know that there was an internal condition and an external condition of field associated with any physical structure.

This I believe has thrown us off when we consider atomic energy, as we perceive a fission reaction as accessing the internal energy of the atom, when in fact we have not accessed the internal energy at all, but merely extended the external dynamics.

In other words nuclear fission does not allow us to employ the energy of the atom, as there is a relative increase in resistance to a further increase in energy without having accessed the energy of the atom.

The underlying energy of any system sustains and perpetuates the dynamics of physical structure, which means that the underlying energy is of a creative nature and is non-destructive. Yet, from what we know we might assume that atomic energy is destructive, but without realizing that this destructive force is not energy, but merely the effect of an increase in resistance.

In other words, atomic energy is based on a false assumption of understanding, which should provide us with a very real incentive in attempting to harness what we refer to as free energy or zero point energy.

In relation to fission, a fission reaction increases the energy per unit of mass. If this were not true fission would not be possible in the first place, as an increase in energy affects an increase in the space and motion existing relative to the system of reference. In this respect one of the two pieces is smaller than the other, while one of the pieces is bigger than the other, whereby one has more energy than the other.

This is similar to the Earth/Moon system, in that the (ntffa) of the Moon is higher than that of the Earth, therefore the Moon is moving away from the Earth faster than the Earth is moving away from the Moon, in that the space and motion increases relative to an increase in (ntffa) effecting both bodies.

In terms of gravity control, we can see that the gravitational effect is decreasing relative to the higher rate of (ntffa) associated with the lunar field, whereby the mass of the Moon is decreasing in proportion to an increase in (ntffa).

Therefore we do not have to worry about the Moon falling on the Earth or the decay of the lunar orbit, as the Moon maintains it's distance due to a differential in (ntffa) relative to the field of the Earth.

And as the underlying energy of the Moon continues to increase, the Moon will continue to move away from the Earth at an ever increasing rate.

So the trick to gravity control is controlling the underlying dynamics by modulating the energy flow to the center of field, in relation to a focusing of the field dynamics.

To better understand this we can consider a simple optical lens, such as a magnifying glass, as the lens affects the field existing relative to it without effecting the field itself, which is a pretty cool trick.

In other words the lens is modulating the field existing relative to it's curvature, without effecting the field itself. So there are two aspects of a single field involved here, one aspect of which remains relative to the curvature of the lens and one that remains relative to the Earth.

The simplicity of this is a little awesome I must admit, but it gives us some idea of what is involved in attempting to modulate (ntffa) in relation to gravity control.

A simple lens cannot actually modulate (ntffa) in a controlled manner, as it is a fixed system, in that the differential in dynamic potential maintains a specific relationship, but if we could design a system capable of modulating (ntffa) in a controlled manner the modulator would provide us with a relative system of reference existing independent of the Earth, just as the Moon exists independent of the Earth.

So the trick to gravity control is to build a system based on the dynamics of a planet, moon, star or atom.

Here we must be sure we understand the dynamics involved, as our existing standards can throw us off.

It is commonly assumed that when an electron moves to a higher electron shell it has more energy, and when it falls back to the lower shell level is loses this extra energy. But, this is actually the opposite of what happens, as the increased velocity of the electron in the higher electron shell decreases the energy potential of the electron, but increases the energy potential of the nucleus, as the underlying energy is always focused to the center of field.

So, when we apply a charge to a ring or some other similar devise it levitates, as the increase in resistance effecting the external portion of field affects the internal portion of field in an inverse manner, whereby there is an increase in energy relative to the field in which the devise or ring is situated. But once the charge is discontinued the ring or devise falls to the floor or table top.

What we have done is temporarily increase the underlying dynamic force by increasing the potential of resistance, but not successfully modulated the underlying dynamic force in a controlled manner. But if we consider the underlying dynamics we might realize that the control must come from within the devise and not from outside.

In other words, we must design the internal portion of the devise to modulate the system in a controlled manner without an influence originating from outside the system. It must happen from within and not from without.

This is the challenge, to control the internal dynamics from within, which in turn will modulate the space existing relative to the system. The system itself will become the system of reference, whereby there will be a non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to it, which will be different from the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to the Earth.

Field Distortion

2005-06-19T19:34:00.000-07:00

One might wonder how a simple field of frequency could affect the dynamics of physical structure?

To understand this we only have to realize that the molecules of all physical structure are made up of atoms, which in turn are the product of an underlying dynamic force affecting dynamic field frequency responses.

The physical matter of Universe is nothing less than field frequency response, in relation to the external and internal dynamics affecting inverse responses. Therefore there is nothing solid or static involved, as the responses constituting physical matter are purely dynamic, which means they are nothing more than a continuance of dynamic responses associated with (ntffa).

The idea of physical matter having solid substance is formulated on the basis of a purely physiological and psychological interpretation, based on our inherent ability to function and survive in the environment of our planet.

We perceive space, time and motion relative to our need to navigate and function within the environment in which we exist, in terms of sensory responses. And this in itself restricts us to a limited understanding of our environment.

However, we possess the ability to look beyond the barriers of our existing perceptions and see the true nature of Universe in the form of a purely dynamic condition. This means that we are, as is all matter, a continuance of what we were yesterday and a continuance of what we will be tomorrow, but there is no present moment where we exist in a static state. Therefore there is no now, as it is impossible to define now in terms of a single instance of existence.

Time does not stop in order that we might consider the possibility of time, as time is continuously in motion relative to the system of reference. This means that we cannot define a present moment existing separate from the past and future, as no such present moment exists.

To make this more clearly understood we must realize that time itself cannot be defined in terms of an instance or in terms of a linear duration, as no such instance or duration can be accurately defined or even demonstrated to exist, as the mere act of attempting to define an instance or a duration can only occur in the context of field frequency continuance, which is either accelerating or decelerating. And in this respect there is nothing perceivable that remains stationary in order that it might be evaluated in terms of a static state.

This is why our insistence that light speed should be considered a constant prevents us from moving forward, as we insist that it should be possible to define a constant upon which to base our assessment of Universe. In other words we want to make it possible to determine the size and age of Universe in terms of linear proportions, when in fact the Universe is not linearly structured or linearly dimensioned.

The idea that the age of something can be determined on the basis of a linear relationship undermines our ability to perceive our own situation, whereby we remain vulnerable to the errors of an abstract idea.

Any non-uniform field potential represents a hazard to the structural dynamics of physical matter, whether that matter exists within the biosphere or the geosphere. Furthermore, non-uniform field potentials affect the dynamics of the solar field system as a whole.

Therefore we might consider the non-uniform affects of our nuclear testing over the last five or six decades to have had some affect on the condition of the solar mass, as the influence of our nuclear agenda provides massive distortions resulting from the non-uniformity of our industry.

We reject such a notion out of hand, yet ponder the possibility of global warming on the basis of something we might be capable of correcting, without fully understanding the basic dynamics determining the form and function of physical structure.

Yet, we have evidence to suggest that our modern low frequency communication systems are altering the physical form and function of our brain cells, which we generally dismiss on the basis of uncertainty.

On the other hand we have the affects of high voltage transmission lines running in close proximity to human habitation, whereby young children are readily subject to leukemia and other such forms of illness associated with non-uniform field potentials.

And should we realize that our physical continuance was itself nothing less than a field of frequency, we might consider the possibility that a non-uniform potential is very effective in distorting the relative continuance of uniformity associated with our field of frequency.

To date our ability to affect change has been limited to an increased potential of resistance, which corresponds to a decrease in the available underlying energy. But should we develop high energy systems it would be possible to cause physical matter to simply vanish.

In other words it might be possible to shoot holes in the very fabric of space, whereby planes, tanks, trucks or ships could be made to simply vanish.

I give this as an example in order to make a point concerning the dangers of non-uniformity, as the affects of non-uniformity are hazardous to the various life forms existing on our planet.

A non-uniform potential results from the non-uniform underlying energy potential of a field situated within a field, in that the potential of energy affecting the potential of resistance is beyond the non-absolute limits of the uniform field of frequency in which we presently exist.

To make this point clearly understood we might consider the energy deficiency of uranium, in that uranium exists in a non-uniform state relative to the uniform field in which it exists. In other words the underlying energy potential of uranium is too low to sustain a stable field structure. And as such the uranium is attempting to adapt to the environment by decreasing it's mass resistance and increasing it's energy potential relative to the field in which it exists, by means of nuclear decay.

In turn uranium affects the fabric of the environment by distorting the more highly energized fields of frequency, and in this respect the more highly energized elements are vulnerable to distortion, which puts hydrogen at the top of the endangered list, whereby any molecules containing hydrogen are more susceptible to distortion than those containing elements denoted at the other end of the periodic table.

And considering that hydrogen is the basic constituent of any life form, it should not be surprising to discover that the more highly complex life forms should be more noticeably affected.

Furthermore, it can be shown that memory, in terms of learned perceptions and concepts, exist as a continuance of field frequency, therefore it is possible for the continuance of memory to be distorted, which would affect the survival of life forms dependent upon the application of learned knowledge.

This in itself might very well reduce the intellectual capacity of the human species to discern those basic requirements for survival, while increasing destructive tendencies.

At the present we generally ignore the affects of field distortion, while attempting to find more politically favorable explanations for a variety of illness and disease, including genetic alterations and deformities affecting viral and biological agents.

Consequently it is not too difficult to understand the inherent hazards and risks involved in denying the existence of field distortion, as the factors of non-uniformity are being proliferated at an alarming and dangerous rate.

Therefore the possibility of gravity control is not limited to the theoretical aspirations of a few idle dreamers, but represents a fundamental desire for the human species to survive despite the inherent limitations of existing standards.

Time

2005-06-17T00:54:00.000-07:00

Time is generally considered in terms of an abstract idea, associated with the motion of the Earth, which corresponds to defined linear intervals of time measured in terms of reference corresponding to single units of linear duration, such as seconds, minutes and hours.

Unfortunately this concept gives us a false perception of time, as we presently believe each second to be of an equal duration, as it is thought possible for two or more seconds to be of an equal duration.

Such a situation would require the Universe to exist in a static state, whereby it would be possible to define an absolute unit of measure capable of defining an absolute duration of time. But as our Universe does not exist in a static state it is impossible to define an absolute duration of time, as there is no such thing as an absolute second, minute or hour.

And in terms of a dynamic state, each second, minute and hour is of a slightly different value, which limits our ability to fully comprehend the meaning of time measured in seconds, minutes and hours.

If we consider time in the context of a truly dynamic state, we might realize that time is itself a dynamic force affecting the condition of space and motion, in relation to the condition of Universe remaining relative to the system of reference. In other words, time, in terms of a dynamic force, affecting a dynamic condition, is different for every system of Universe.

Therefore time is different for each of the atomic elements, just as time is different for each of the planets, moons and stars etc.

But just as time cannot be defined in terms of a linear duration, it is equally true that spatial dimensions cannot be accurately defined in terms of linear distance, as there is no such thing as an absolute meter, foot or mile. Equally there is no such thing as an absolute gram, ounce or pound.

In this respect no two meter rules are of the same absolute length, as each meter must be of a slightly different length, just as no two grams can be of an absolute equal weight.

In that time is a dynamic component of Universe affecting space and motion, time itself must be either accelerating or decelerating relative to each system of reference. This means that time is either fast or slow in relation to the dynamic condition of every system of Universe remaining relative to a single system of reference.

In other words, all other systems constituting the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remain relative to the system of reference, where our planet Earth is our system of reference.

I refer to time in terms of NON-LINEAR TIME FIELD FREQUENCY ACCELERATION, (ntffa), as (ntffa) is the underlying force of Universe which determines the form and function of all physical matter.

And in that (ntffa) is continuously accelerating symmetrically to the center of the Earth, time accelerates to the center of the Earth's core, a fact which is supported by experimental data.

This in itself is quite incredible, as the energy of the Earth increases proportionally to the center of the Earth's core.

Therefore there is more energy within the inner core of the Earth than exists within the rest of the Earth's structure, which contradicts our existing assessment of the Earth's structure and our assessment of energy.

We presently assume that there is a proportional relationship of energy and mass, whereby the greater mass is thought to possess more energy, which is partially true, but does not tell us the whole story. So our existing assessment is in error.

There is a definite relationship between energy and mass, but it is the smaller or lesser mass which possesses the greater proportion of energy per unit of mass. In other words hydrogen has the highest energy potential of any known element despite hydrogen's small mass.

In relation to (ntffa) hydrogen is a very fast element, as time is highly accelerated relative to the field of the Earth in which it exists, which is why hydrogen rises skyward. In this respect hydrogen provides us with a hint to the possibility of achieving gravity control, as hydrogen defies gravity.

Time is highly accelerated in respect to the dynamics of the hydrogen atom, in that the dynamic force of (ntffa) is focused to the center of the hydrogen atom's field.

Therefore it is not gravity itself which determines whether something goes up or down, but the factor of time associated with that which goes up or down.

To control gravity we need only find a method by which to modulate the underlying force of (ntffa) and shazam, we have gravity control, which is in fact a very simple process.

Time, in terms of (ntffa), controls the dynamics of any physical structure and as gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but merely a dynamic response determined by (ntffa), the relative control of (ntffa) affects gravity.

Gravity Control requires an apparatus based on the structure of the atom, whereby the field of the apparatus can be modulated, in terms of an (ntffa) modulator. This involves a dynamic configuration in the form of a four phase electromagnetic drive, which is capable of focusing the dynamics of field in any direction.

In other words, it is not enough to simply go up and down, as the apparatus must also allow for thrust in order to provide the required aerodynamics. And to this end there must be directional focus in not only an up and down direction, but also in a horizontal right and or left direction relative to the vertical up and or down.

In relation to our hopes of achieving gravity control it is imperative that we understand the dynamics involved, otherwise we are simply taking pot-shots in the dark.

Therefore I cannot overstate the importance of those basic principles involved, which I am attempting to convey under a variety of subject titles found here on Gravity Control Idealism.

Time is the key to our future, as it is time which controls our relationship with Universe.

At the present time, time itself is not generally considered to exist as a dynamic force, as it is assumed that time, in terms of an abstract idea, is the product of space and motion, in terms of a relative relationship. Yet, the space and motion of Universe is in fact the product of time, in that time is different for every system of Universe.

In relation to astrophysics, this should be clearly understood, but it appears that astrophysics is determined to maintain a position of defiance in this respect, as time is not presently considered capable of affecting the dynamics of physical structure.

If new energy researchers consider the possibility of modulating time, they will discover that every application which produces a potential of resistance, employed for the purpose of our human industry, involves not only a differential in resistance but an actual differential in time associated with the process involved. And that the differential in resistance is a direct result of an underlying differential in time, (ntffa).

Therefore, it should be possible to understand that a linear fuel supply is completely unnecessary, in relation to a solid, liquid or gaseous fuel, in order to provide for the energy requirements of our human industry.

A differential in time not only affects a gravitational response but also affects an electromagnetic response, whereby the internal and external dynamic responses of any unified field system remain inversely proportional.

So, in as much as time is accelerating symmetrically to the non-absolute center of field, it is also isometrically decelerating from the center of field to the non-absolute perimeter of Universe, in respect to the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

Plus, there is an upper and lower limit to the (ntffa) associated with any unified field structure existing relative to our system of reference, in that only those systems which remain within the relative limits of (ntffa) associated with our relative unified field system remain within the physical context of the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to our system of reference. This means that there is a simultaneous condition of Universe existing beyond the relative non-absolute boundaries of our existing dynamic field state, which is not presently accessible to us by any generally acknowledged means of communication.

This does not mean that access to the simultaneous condition of Universe is not possible, because it most certainly is possible, but is simply not acknowledged to be possible in relation to our existing science and technology, which is fundamentally limited by the concept of a static condition.

Gravity XXXX

2005-06-15T01:48:00.000-07:00

We refer to gravity as a force, yet gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but exists as a dynamic response to non-linear time field frequency acceleration, (ntffa), the underlying force remaining relative to our planet Earth.

In an equal manner we refer to centrifugal force existing as an inverse affect of gravity, but like gravity the centrifugal affect is not itself a force of any kind.

The field of our planet represents a dynamically balanced field, consequently the gravitational response corresponds to that of a dynamically balanced field structure, in that the gravitational response diminishes in both an outward direction and an inward direction.

This means that the Earth's greatest potential of gravity exists along the surface curve of the Earth, as the gravitational potential decreases symmetrically to the center of the Earth and isometrically into space. At the nonabsolute center of the Earth the relative potential of gravity has a non-absolute value of zero, which corresponds to the nonabsolute upper limit of (ntffa), described in terms of (c+).

In this respect the bulk of the Earth's mass, existing within the inner core, does not correspond to a gravitational potential, but exists as a relative affect of (ntffa) increasing proportionally to the center of field. In other words it is the dynamic energy potential of (ntffa) increasing to the center of field which determines the bulk of the Earth's mass to be located within the inner core.

The Earth exists as an oblate spheroid, in that the poles are somewhat flattened. Also, there is an equatorial bulge whereby there is a defined decrease in gravity extending from the poles to the equator, which has been commonly explained as an affect of centrifugal force, in that centrifugal force has been considered to be an inverse affect of gravity. But as neither the gravitational affect or the centrifugal affect represent a force of any kind, centrifugal force does not explain the equatorial bulge.

Both the flattening of the poles and the equatorial bulge correspond to the dynamic condition of the Earth's field structure. Therefore it is possible to understand that the decrease in gravity extending from the poles to the equator and the increase in gravity extending from the equator to the poles is due to an unequal but proportional distribution of dynamic force extending horizontally over the external surface curve of the Earth.

The differential in gravity existing between the poles and the equator affects an actual decrease in weight at the equator, which amounts to a decrease of 1 gram for every 190 grams of weight, which is not much of a difference, but a difference nonetheless.

It is this condition which represents a most difficult challenge in attempting to understand the dynamic structure of our planet, so it is critical to acknowledge that the exterior dynamics and the interior dynamics produce different affects. And in respect to the surface curve of the Earth this can appear a little confusing due to the non-absolute nature of the structural boundary separating the interior from the exterior. And whether we are on the surface of the Earth, Moon or Mars etc. We will find some small differential in gravity existing between the equator and the poles.

In order to understand this difference in gravity existing between the equator and the poles we must first understand that non-linear dynamics work in a unique manner, whereby an increase in (ntffa) affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in (ntffa), whereby the higher rate of (ntffa) the lower the dynamic resistance to a further increase in (ntffa). And as (ntffa) increases to the center of the Earth, the factor of resistance decreases to the center of the Earth.

Therefore the greater resistance is found to exist across the surface curve of the Earth and as the equatorial radius of the Earth is slightly greater than the polar radius there is less dynamic energy at the equator affecting a horizontal belt of increased resistance. Therefore there is a higher proportional degree of resistance affecting the internal and external dynamic structure of the Earth at the equator than exists anywhere else on or within the Earth.

This increased potential of dynamic resistance causes a differential in the dynamic energy potential of (ntffa) existing between the equator and the poles, which causes the equator to bulge slightly and for the poles to be slightly flattened. Therefore the equatorial bulge and the flattening of the poles is an affect caused by the internal and external dynamics of the Earth's field structure.

In respect to the increased gravity existing at the poles, this is merely a proportional relationship corresponding to a differential in resistance existing between the equator and the poles, in respect to the external dynamics affecting the condition existing across the surface curve of the Earth.

There is a decrease in gravity extending from the poles to the equator, as the increased radius at the equator extends the external field of the Earth in an outwardly curved arc, in relation to the surface curve of the Earth extending horizontally from one pole across the equator to the other pole.

Also, located at the poles is the maximum dynamic energy affecting the external dynamics of the Earth's structure, which affectively contributes to the flattening in the area surrounding the poles.

I would suggest that the degree of flattening at the poles and the extent of the equatorial bulge should be viewed in terms of those existing conditions having resulted from external forces acting upon the dynamic structure of the Earth, in relation to the affects of two or more planetary bodies coming within close proximity of each other. Therefore these distortional affects of flattening and bulging cannot be attributed solely to the naturally occurring processes existing on or within the Earth itself, but may have resulted from the affects of a non-uniform potential involving at least one other planetary body.

It can be shown that vertical affects and horizontal affects cause much different responses, consequently it is important to make distinctions between vertical affects and horizontal affects.

Now we come to another aspect of gravity, as it has been determined that gravity is higher or stronger at the tops of mountains, in that there is a differential in gravity existing between sea level and the tops of mountains existing above sea level.

This circumstance is due to the internal dynamics of the Earth, as a mountain is a vertical extension of the Earth's internal field, whereby there exists a differential in dynamic potential extending from the base of the mountain to its top, with the lower dynamic potential of (ntffa) existing at the top of the mountain.

The underlying dynamic potential of (ntffa) decreases proportionally from the center of the Earth, whereby gravity increases in direct proportion to the dynamic decrease in (ntffa), which allows for the greatest gravitational potential to exist across the surface curve of the Earth. And as a mountain is a vertical extension of the surface curve, the internal dynamics of the Earth have their lowest dynamic potential of (ntffa) located at the tops of mountains existing above sea level, whereby there is more gravity existing at the top of these mountains.

And as (ntffa) is the underlying force determining the condition of field, in terms of both form and function, it is not too difficult to understand that the top of a mountain is the geographic location least capable of supporting physical structure, in relation to the physical structure of a mountain as a whole, which is why mountains tend to taper skyward, as do trees and other physical formations representing a vertical extension of the Earth's internal structure.

It is important to remember that external dynamics and internal dynamics function differently in relation to affecting inversely proportional responses, whereby allowing for a balanced field structure.

And as the rate of (ntffa) is continuously accelerating in four dimensional directions the gravity of our Earth is decreasing in proportion to the continuous increase in (ntffa). Therefore it can be speculatively assumed that the physical structuring of our planet is an ongoing process.

Now we come to free fall and in order to consider the process of free fall it is essential to acknowledge that free fall is associated with the external dynamics of the Earth's field, in that there is both an external and internal condition of field. And if this were not the case, there would be no distinction between an inside condition and an outside condition of field.

Equally the falling mass itself has both an internal condition and an external condition of field.

And in as much as the falling mass is affected by the underlying dynamic force of the field in which it is falling, the falling mass itself must respond in an equal manner to the existing conditions of field in which it exists.

This is why any unsupported mass existing in the external field of the Earth must fall to the Earth's surface, following a direct path toward the center of the Earth, at a rate of acceleration corresponding to the conditions of field, in that the falling mass is following the path of least resistance.

In this respect a free falling mass within the external field of our Earth is observed to be linearly accelerating at a rate of approximately 32.2 feet per second, per second, while the falling mass itself must be non-linearly decelerating in direct proportion the accelerating field in which it is falling.

And it is this proportional dynamic response which causes an equal rate of acceleration to affect two or more unequal bodies of mass in an equal manner.

The underlying dynamic force of (ntffa) is symmetrically accelerating from the nonabsolute outer boundary of Universe to the center of the Earth's core and it is the relative acceleration of (ntffa), existing in the external portion of the Earth's field which determines the rate of free fall to be accelerating at roughly 32.2 feet per second per second.

This is why there is a differential in gravity existing between the Earth and the Moon, with the Moon having the lower gravity. The underlying dynamic force of (ntffa) affecting the external field of the Moon is proportionally higher than the underlying dynamic force of (ntffa) affecting the external field of the Earth.

Therefore there is a proportional decrease in non-linear accelerative resistance corresponding to an increase in (ntffa) and an inversely proportional increase in the linear resistance of the falling mass itself, which in turn reduces the linear acceleration of the falling mass.

Consequently this effectively reduces the rate of free fall towards the lunar surface, but it equally affects a differential in weight, whereby a 100 grams situated on the surface of the Earth is reduced to roughly 17 grams on the surface of the Moon.

The rate of (ntffa) existing across the external surface curve of the Moon is considerably higher than the rate of (ntffa) existing across the external surface curve of the Earth. And as the lunar rate of (ntffa) is continuously accelerating at an ever increasing rate, the external space and motion corresponding to the Earth/Moon system continues to increase.

In relation to the Earth/Moon system the Moon is moving away from the Earth faster than the Earth is moving away from the Moon, due to an accelerating differential in (ntffa) affecting the condition of the Earth/Moon system.

Now we come to something quite amazing, in that the process of free fall and the process of a rocket soaring skyward are both determined by the same underlying dynamic force. The only difference between free fall and a rocket soaring skyward is a differential in the underlying dynamic energy potential existing between the falling mass and the field in which it is falling and a differential in the underlying dynamic energy potential of the rocket and the field in which it is soaring, as both the falling mass and the soaring rocket are responding to the dynamic field in which they exist.

This is why a hydrogen balloon rises skyward, as the inherent underlying dynamic energy potential of elementary hydrogen is sufficient to allow it to overcome the underlying dynamic force of (ntffa) associated with the field in which it exists.

The idea of hydrogen merely being lighter than air does not give us a clear picture of the potential possibilities, as (ntffa) can in fact be modulated in a controlled manner. Thus allowing for a modular field structure capable of modulating (ntffa) in a controlled manner to rise skyward and be returned safely to the ground.

So, a linearly accelerating mass must itself be non-linearly decelerating relative to the condition of field in which it exists, while a linearly decelerating mass must itself be non-linearly accelerating relative to the field in which it exists.

This situation corresponds to the dynamic potential of the mass itself, which allows for a proportional balance in dynamic potential corresponding to the process of flight. As without linear acceleration a rocket would not achieve it's goal, nor would a conventional aircraft fly.

And although this works , it is a very difficult method by which to achieve flight. A simpler method would involve a system affecting the underlying dynamic potential of the aircraft in a positive manner, which would prove less stressful for the aircraft and crew.

And despite the fact that it is impossible to force a stationary conventional aircraft situated on the ground to linearly decelerate it is not impossible to affect an aircraft in such a manner as to increase it's non-linear dynamic energy potential in terms of (ntffa).

To consider the possibility of affecting anti-gravity we only have to examine the dynamic process by which a tree lifts fluid from it's roots to the extremities of it's growth.

It is presently argued that this process involves a pulling action, drawing the fluid up the xylem, while some consider the process to involve a pushing action, while still others consider the process to result from both a pulling and a pushing action, but there is no real evidence to support any of these theories. Yet, despite the respective arguments put forward, the trees continue to lift fluid in an extremely efficient manner.

A tree is capable of lifting fluid as fast as 150 feet per hour and a mature tree can lift roughly 100 gallons of fluid per day, which is a lot of fluid and a lot of lifting. Yet, no one is quite sure how it is done, which is partly due to the fact that the process appears to represent an impossibility, but still the trees lift fluid. And the reason why the process seems impossible is due to the fact that the process appears to defy gravity.

The process by which trees lift fluid up the xylem involves neither a pulling or a pushing, but involves a dynamic function by which the tree is capable of affecting its internal dynamics.

This dynamic process allows the tree to affectively modulate the dynamic motion of the fluid, whereby the tree increases the dynamic energy potential of its internal field in which the fluid is to be lifted, allowing the fluid to rise up the xylem much like a hydrogen balloon would rise skyward in the external field.

The ring structure of the tree is the key to this process, in that the xylem are located along the circumference of each ring, whereby the xylem cells are stacked vertically, one on top of the other, allowing for both horizontal and vertical spacing of the individual xylem cells. Furthermore the individual xylem cells are capable of independent motion in the form of tilting from side to side and back and forth while maintaining a relatively stationary position within the context of the trees physical structure.

The tilting motion of the xylem cells allows for the modulation of the field in which the fluid is to be lifted, lowered or shifted horizontally along the branches, in respect to a focusing of the internal field relative to the external field.

What is so amazing about this process is that it requires a cooperative effort on the part of the xylem cells to focus the field in a manner determining the form and function involved. And without this cooperative effort affecting the focus of field, the process would not work. So there should be no question as to whether a tree is a living organism capable of this cooperative organization.

It must be kept in mind that a tree does not simply lift fluid in a continuous manner, but actually controls the flow of fluid whereby the flow can be reversed, slowed or increased as required.

To fully appreciate this dynamic process it must be remembered that a differential in gravity exists between the roots of the tree and the top of the trunk, in that the internal structure of the tree is an extension of the Earth's internal field , while the outside of the tree is an extension of the Earth's external field, which places the higher gravity at the top of the tree. Consequently it takes more dynamic modulation near the top of the tree than it does at the bottom to maintain a steady rate of flow.

In this respect the new growth is located at the ends of branches and at the top of the tree, which is proportionally tapered, whereby the newer growth is more flexible, which allows for a greater degree of modulation in relation to the vertical and horizontal limitations of field focus associated with trees.

This might sound like science fiction, but Project Unity had designed an (ntffa) modulator prior to discovering the identical process occurring in trees. In other words it was only after the fact that the amazing dynamics of trees was discovered. But it must be noted that the design of Project Unity developed for the sole purpose of modulating (ntffa) is dynamically identical to the naturally occurring modulation system associated with trees.

The shape of the xylem cell is similar to the disc shape of the nickel/cobalt magnets employed in an (ntffa) modulator, including a hole in the center. The hole in the center of each xylem cell allows for the passage of fluid from one cell to the next, while the hole in the center of the magnetic discs allows them to be mounted on a control arm by means of a mounting pin. And in either system, involving the xylem cells and or the magnetic discs, they can be tilted in a manner allowing for the focusing of field.

A tree remains stationary as it is designed to remain stationary in respect to the polarity of the field in which it is situated, as the tree is subject to the horizontal and vertical dynamics of the field in which it exists.

In the case of Project Unity, the (ntffa) modulator is designed for aerodynamic mobility, allowing for lift and thrust, consequently the modulator is inverted in relation to the structure of a tree. But regardless of the inverted design, the basic function remains the same, which is to allow for vertical and horizontal motion.

And as (ntffa) modulation is just as sophisticated as rocket science, it seems a little humorous that an alternative system has been readily available for such an extremely long time, yet completely missed, as the dynamics of a tree affects an anti-gravitational response.

Furthermore, an (ntffa) modulator does not run on jet fuel or any other linearly defined fuel supply, it simply modulates a dynamic differential between itself, which is the relative system of reference, and the field in which it exists, which in turn affects the condition of space and motion remaining relative to the system of reference. It's that simple.

To gain a perspective of an anti-gravitational response we only have to consider the gravitational differential existing between the Earth and the Moon, where a 100 gram weight on the surface of the Earth weighs only about 17 grams on the surface of the Moon, simply because the rate of (ntffa) associated with the lunar field is many times greater that of our Earth's field. So the modulation of field dynamics is hardly an impossible task.

In relation to the idea that gravity holds the planets in orbit around the Sun, we must realize that the gravity existing at the center of the solar mass has a non-absolute value of zero. As it is not a force of gravity which holds the planets in orbit around the Sun.

It is a differential in (ntffa) existing between the Sun and each of the planets which allows the planets to remain in orbit

And as the differential in (ntffa) existing between each of the planets and the Sun is continuously increasing, at a different rate for each of the planets, it can be assumed that the stability of the solar system is cyclical in relation to the various relationships involved.

In other words, the existing planetary orbits are not permanent, but are subject to adjustment, in relation to the various differentials in (ntffa) associated with the various planets, at different times, during their history. So it should not come as a surprise that the Earth should have been located closer to the Sun during historical times. Nor should it seem at all unreasonable to suggest that planets might at different times cross each others orbits or experience near collisions in space, as the underlying dynamics suggest this to have occurred in the past, whereby it will also occur in the future.

So, the present order of the solar field system represents the condition remaining relative to our planet Earth.

The Electrical Connection

2005-06-12T20:17:00.000-07:00

An electric potential is the product of resistance, in relation to a relative differential in the underlying energy of any system.

In our modern world we employ the turning of turbines to produce an electrical potential. And in order to turn the turbines we employ water, gas, coal or nuclear power, believing each of them capable of providing the necessary energy.

An understanding of this situation is imperative in relation to achieving gravity control, as none of these provide a source of energy. But what they do provide is a potential of resistance, in that we have mistakenly labeled or incorrectly named a potential of resistance as a potential of energy.

This error originated with Einstein's concept of a static Universe, in that he assumed an increase in linear velocity produced a proportional increase in energy, but unfortunately an increase in linear velocity does not produce an increase in energy, but affects a decrease in energy.

It should be considered impossible that an increase in velocity should be capable of producing both an increase in resistance to a further increase in velocity and a proportional increase in energy, as energy and resistance must be considered to be opposites in relation to an underlying dynamic force.

This incidentally involves a question of perception, in that we have not previously considered the existence of an underlying dynamic force to be present, which has caused problems to arise.

The most obvious of which manifests itself in our attempts to determine the most efficient method by which to provide for an economical source of energy without knowing exactly what energy is, which makes the job extremely difficult.

Take the idea of a river providing the energy needed to drive a turbine, when in fact the river or the water of the river provides no energy to the process. Water, in relation to the flow of water following the course of a river, follows the path of least resistance, in that the water is itself resistant to anything in it's path. But the water itself provides no energy to anything in it's path as it has no energy to spare regardless of the speed at which it flows.

It is the underlying dynamic force of the accelerating field in which the water exists which provides the energy by which the water is capable of flowing, but does not impart a potential of energy directly to the water.

As the water flows from high ground to low, the water itself loses energy relative to the underlying force of the field in which it is flowing. In other words, as a river flows from a mountain to the sea it follows the path of least resistance as supplied by the underlying field of frequency which is continuously accelerating symmetrically to the center of the Earth, while the river itself loses energy as it flows.

If this were not the case the river would not flow, but would remain frozen, which is exactly what happens when a river freezes in winter. When the temperature of the water drops to freezing the energy of the water is increased by the process of freezing to a point proportional to the field in which it exists, which causes the water to remain stationary.

As simple as this observation might appear it is not at all obvious unless the existence of an underlying force is taken into consideration.

The mere action of water flowing provides an electrical potential, due to the resistant nature of the water flowing relative to the field in which it exists. So the faster the water flows the more resistance is associated with it's flow, which allows water to drive a turbine, which is proportionally resistant to the flow of the water. And due to the turning of the turbine relative to the field in which it exists the turbine produces a measurable increase in resistance in proportion to the speed at which it turns.

This means that the turning turbine is itself losing energy relative to the field in which it exists while increasing it's outflow of resistance relative to the field in which it exists, which is communicated in terms of an electrical charge.

Therefore the process involved in producing an electrical charge is somewhat simplified, as all that is required is a differential in the underlying energy potential at any point within the field.

In other words we don't need water, gas, coal or a nuclear reactor to produce electricity, as all we require is a method by which to modulate a differential in field frequency acceleration relative to the field in which we exist.

And as electromagnetism and gravity are not themselves forces of any kind, but merely dynamic responses to the underlying force, it should not be too difficult to modulate the underlying field sufficiently to moderate both gravity and electromagnetism by means of a simple field frequency modulator.

The resistant nature of an electrical charge should appear obvious to any electrical engineer, in that an electrical charge is the product of resistance and as such could hardly be considered itself to represent a source of energy.

If we mean that energy is something which does work, we are deliberately confusing ourselves and making our quest for new energy systems extremely difficult.

If energy were a resistant force, we would quickly run out of energy, as it would be impossible to sustain the dynamic integrity of physical structure on the basis of a resistant force of energy. In other words, without the continuous acceleration of the underlying force, the integrity of physical structure would fail. Therefore the underlying force of energy must be non-resistant in relation to an increase in energy affecting a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy.

It is perhaps noteworthy to mention that both Special and General Relativity were formulated on the bases of a static condition, in that Einstein, at the time, believed the condition of Universe to be static.

And if we are to determine an efficient method by which to produce electricity we must embrace the dynamic condition of Universe and make the appropriate corrections, as it is counterproductive to continue on in an erroneous manner.

From this we should realize that gravity control is not simply a matter of getting a physical mass to levitate upon command, but equally allows for a sustainable source of electricity without any further consumption of our natural resources and or any further polluting of our environment.

So, the quest for gravity control represents a significant challenge to our modern world.

Interplanetary Contact

2005-06-11T00:10:00.000-07:00

The Apollo Missions put a man on the Moon, but we did not go back as originally planned to establish a permanent base.

The reason for this is rather complex, but nonetheless very important in respect to accessing space and the natural resources of space.

During the Apollo Missions we discovered that lunar materials existed in a non-uniform state relative to our Earth, which means the lunar materials are out of sync with the field of our earthly environment.

We exist in a relatively uniform field of frequency, in relation to our earthly environment. Of course there are anomalies of non-uniformity existing on our Earth, but generally speaking we exist in a fairly uniform field of frequency.

Yet, despite what we have been led to believe, all other planetary bodies maintain a non-uniform relationship with our Earth, in terms of a relative relationship.

This means that the time, space and motion of Universe existing relative to all bodies in space is different, in varying degrees. Some differences are small and others are large, but nonetheless they are different and consequently maintain a non-uniform relationship with each other.

In practical terms, we cannot eat or drink anything originating on another planetary body, nor can we grow our own food on another planetary body even if we bring our own seeds along with us. We cannot drink the water, regardless of it's purity or breathe the air regardless of it's content.

If we eat or drink the resources of another planetary body, that food and drink will cause us to become very ill, as we will suffer genetic deformities and cancer, as well as either accelerated or decelerated growth and or cellular replication, which constitutes a very serious situation, to say the least.

Although we will find identical elements existing elsewhere in the Universe, those elements exist in altered states of non-uniformity relative to our Earth. This means that the rate of field frequency acceleration associated with their field structure is either lower or higher than that here on Earth, in relation to past and or future conditions remaining relative to our Earth's present moment.

Lunar materials for example are historical relative to our Earth, which means they are very old. But they are not old in terms of a uniform relationship, but old in terms of a non-uniform relationship.

If we were to drink water which might exist on the Moon or Mars it would cause distortions to occur in relation to the uniform acceleration of field frequency associated with our body cells. In other words, a non-uniform potential causes our cell structure to become distorted in relation to it's normal form and it's normal function.

This has been experimentally proven, dating back to at least 1971 or earlier, but it is not something which is commonly understood, as the original lunar tests have been censored whereby major portions of the test results have been classified. So, we are led to believe that we might access the resources of space safely without any great difficulty, but this is simply not true.

Without major advances in science and technology we are presently incapable of safely accessing the resources of space in any meaningful manner. In other words, we could access the resources alright, but we can't use them, as they represent a hazard to our health and safety.

So what's the answer? The only way we can safely access the resources of space is to develop a system which allows for a uniform access to the various planets and moons etc. And the only means by which to allow for uniform access is through the application of non-linear dynamics, in the form of instantaneous transformation and or time travel, which provides a means by which to modulate the condition of the materials themselves.

In the most simplest of terms we have to develop a means by which to alter the field frequency of extraterrestrial materials in order that they might correspond with the levels of field frequency associated with of our earthly environment.

Fortunately this is a lot easier than it sounds, as it is possible to modulate the underlying dynamics of any material in relation to affecting an increase and or decrease in field frequency acceleration.

Yet the problem involved here gets a little complicated, as our government and industry are intent on maintaining a nuclear agenda, which was and is a tragic mistake closely related to the problem of non-uniformity associated with extraterrestrial materials.

In attempting to understand the principles governing the underlying dynamics of physical structure one quickly realizes the inherent dangers associated with the nuclear agenda, as our existing concepts of energy and atomic energy is frightfully lacking and in most instances in error.

Nuclear materials exist in a non-uniform state relative to the field in which they exist, so they do in fact cause distortions to the field in which they exist, which in turn affects our environment in a manner similar to that of extraterrestrial materials.

On top of that nuclear materials have extremely low energy potentials, whereby they afford no benefit to the environment of our planet. In fact, their energy levels are so low that they suffer an energy deficiency corresponding to their non-uniform condition.

So, in effect we are caught in a bit of a trap in respect to further development, as further advances in science and technology will also unmask the mistakes of the past, which is not necessarily considered advantageous to many of those in positions of authority.

But, nonetheless we continue to work towards our goal of achieving gravity control.

The Craft

2005-06-09T23:04:00.000-07:00

In attempting to design a craft capable of gravity control it is important to consider the non-linear nature of dimensional proportions, as in relation to a dynamic system the internal portion of field is mush greater than a linear evaluation would otherwise suggest. An increase in (ntffa) accelerating to the center of field extends the time and space involved, whereby the ratio of energy per unit of mass increases to the center of field.

And as we have already discussed, the value of gravity at the center of field is zero, as gravity decreases proportionally to an increase in (ntffa).

So the question is; how do we modulate the underlying dynamic force of Universe in a controlled manner?

Some 30 years ago I drew up a rough sketch to show what I thought an (ntffa) modulator should look like and many years later I discovered a very similar system existing in nature which provides for the modulation of (ntffa), which is quite amazing in itself.

In this respect we can take a look at the xylem in plants and trees, as the xylem are situated in rings which allows for a horizontal and vertical relationship existing between each xylem cell.
And it is this vertical and horizontal relationship which allows for the internal dynamics to be modulated relative to the external field in which the plants and trees exist. And as the xylem can tilt slightly, this allows the xylem to work in a cooperative manner to lift and lower fluids up and down as required.

To get a clear picture of this we can visualize the xylem in terms of a stepped pyramid, as an (ntffa) modulator is an inverted pyramid which is turned inside out in order for it to become circular.

In other words the (ntffa) modulator would consist of a four phase field system, in the form of four tiered rings of magnetic discs with the smallest ring situated at the bottom and the largest at the top. Therefore there are four graduated rings of magnetic discs, each of which is capable of tilting from side to side and up and down, whereby focusing the center of field in any direction. This allows the craft to lift and lower and move in any one of 360 or more directions.

So we have lift and thrust without the consumption of a linear fuel supply.

Now, the problem is that we don't know the sequence of sizing in relation to the graduated size of the four rings which must remain proportional to the size of the magnetic discs. So, in order to know how many magnetic discs are required in each of the four different sized rings we must know the relationship of each ring and each disc, plus the relationship of each disc relative to the size of the rings.

In this respect the discs must be proportioned relative to the rings, while the rings must be proportional to the discs and the lifting, lowering and tilting of each disc must be precisely calibrated as they must move in sync. If one disc is out of sync, it will throw the whole system out of balance.

Knowing how it works is one thing, but getting it to work is quite another. And in order to refine this system requires a systematic process of trial and error.

But the basic idea is to modulate the internal dynamics of the craft relative to the field in which it exists. And although the craft itself represents a system of reference, the craft itself still exists within the field of the Earth, so what we have is a field within a field in terms of a relative relationship.

Each of the discs would be mounted on a control arm, in that the control arm allows the discs to be tilted side to side and up and down.

We're not there yet, but progress is being made.

The Energy

2005-06-09T21:48:00.000-07:00

When we consider the possibility of controlling gravity, it is imperative that we know what it is we are dealing with and in this respect we can be assured that gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but merely an affect of an underlying force whereby gravity is a dynamic response.

Energy, is the stuff that allows physical structure, in all it's various forms, to exist in terms of a continuance of field frequency acceleration.

This takes us from the linear perception of physical reality, to the non-linear world of dynamic structure.

Einstein described a four dimensional space/time continuum, which was based on his concept of a static Universe, whereby the linear dimensions of space and the linear duration of time were considered adequate to describe the dimensions of Universe.

As the Universe exists as a dynamic condition it is essential to describe the dimensions of Universe in terms of a dynamic state.

To this end we can use the Earth as our model, whereby the Earth exists as a dynamic continuance of field frequency acceleration, in relation to a unified field of frequency remaining relative to the system of reference.

In other words the field of the Earth extends isometrically from the center of the Earth's core to the outer boundary of Universe and symmetrically from the outer boundary of Universe to the center of the Earth's core.

In relation to the physical structure of planet Earth, the Earth exists as a four dimensional continuance, in that there are four dimensions accelerating in four different directions. And those four directions are; in the direction of rotational spin, from the equator to the North Pole, from the equator to the South Pole and symmetrically to the center of the Earth's core.

As the dimensions of physical structure are dynamic, it is possible to use one single term to describe all four dimensions. And that term is NON-LINEAR TIME FIELD FREQUENCY ACCELERATION, (ntffa), in that (ntffa) is continuously accelerating.

One critical consideration concerning (ntffa) is that the underlying energy of Universe does not radiate but is focused inwardly to the center of field, always.

What radiates is a factor of resistance corresponding to a differential in (ntffa)remaining relative to the system of reference. Therefore there is an upper non-absolute limit and a lower non-absolute limit to (ntffa) associated with every system of Universe, whereby every system of Universe has a different differential of (ntffa).

If the energy of Universe is focused to the center of field, this underlying energy is non-resistant, as an increase in (ntffa) affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in (ntffa). This would indicate that the energy of Universe remaining relative to the Earth is continuously increasing, whereby the energy potential of the Sun, Moon, planets etc. is also increasing.

Here I must point out that the internal dynamics of the Earth and the external dynamics of the Earth are inversely proportional. This means that gravity decreases from the Earth's surface curve to the perimeter of Universe and decreases from the Earth's surface curve to the center of the Earth's core, in that the gravitational effect at the center of the Earth is zero, in relation to a non-absolute value.

In turn the electromagnetic potential of the Earth remains proportional to the gravitational potential, whereby there is an inversely proportional positive and negative charge associated with the unified field of frequency remaining relative to the Earth.

And in relation to the dynamic structure of the Earth it is physically impossible to access the internal portion of the Earth, as a hole in the ground is an extension of the external dynamics. The same is true of any physical mass, as in breaking any mass into separate pieces merely extends the external dynamics without allowing access to the internal dynamics as the internal dynamics are always on the inside and never on the outside.

Here we come to a key consideration in the development of a saucer craft or gravity control devise, as the internal dynamics must be enclosed in order for the craft or devise to function properly. In other words the control of a craft or a devise originates internally and not externally. The energy of any system is focused to the center of field and the bulk of any system's energy exists internally.

An increase in energy extends the unified field of any system, but at the same time alters the dimensional properties of the space and motion remaining relative to the system of reference.

This is why the Moon is moving away from the Earth faster than the Earth is moving away from the Moon, as the Moon has the higher (ntffa).

In turn the Sun has a much higher (ntffa), and as an increase in (ntffa) affects a decrease in gravity it would seem reasonable to believe that the gravity of the Sun was incapable of holding the planets in orbit as described by Newton.

What holds the planets in orbit around the sun is a differential in (ntffa) existing between each of the planets and the Sun. And in this respect there is a non-uniform differential in (ntffa) existing between each of the planets and the Sun, with the degree of non-uniformity increasing toward the Sun.

So, in order for a craft to employ gravity control, the craft must be equipped to modulate the underlying energy of the craft from within, whereby the internal and external dynamics of the craft can be controlled in an inversely proportional manner.

In other words, gravity cannot be controlled directly, but can be controlled in terms of a dynamic response resulting from the modulation of (ntffa).

The craft itself must represent a unified field of frequency, where the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to the craft can be modulated in a controlled manner, whereby affecting the space and motion remaining relative to the craft. Thus allowing the craft to move from here to there without the inherent limitations of a linear based system of propulsion.

Therefore a non-linear drive system is required for the purpose of gravity control.

Gravity

2005-06-03T22:38:00.000-07:00

Gravity causes a falling mass to accelerate toward the surface curve of the Earth, which indicates the non-resistant nature of gravity, as gravity follows the path of least resistance in relation to the external portion of the Earth's field.

In this respect the field in which the falling occurs must itself be accelerating in the same direction as the falling mass.

This would further suggest that a factor of resistance must increase skyward, as the resistance of field decreases downward toward the surface of the Earth.

If the underlying energy of the field increases to the center of the Earth, the energy itself must be accelerating, whereby a falling mass must lose energy in proportion to the increasing energy of the field in which it is falling, otherwise it would not fall.

In other words, the field is non-linearly accelerating while the falling mass is linearly accelerating in relation to the underlying energy associated with the field and the falling mass.

And although the mass is linearly accelerating as it falls, it's energy is non-linearly decelerating relative to the acceleration of the field in which it is falling.
If we could devise a method by which to effectively accelerate the energy of the mass it would not fall, but would rise skyward relative to the field in which it exists.

The gravitational field of the Earth is focused symmetrically to the surface curve of the Earth, whereby there is an isometric field of resistance radiating from the surface curve of the Earth, where the level of resistance increases with altitude.

This causes a mass situated far from the Earth not to fall toward the Earth as there is a high level of resistance preventing an increase in linear acceleration toward the Earth.

A rocket fired from the surface of the Earth must accelerate to a speed of roughly 25,000 MPH to escape the gravitational field of the Earth, despite the fact that gravity decreases proportionally with altitude. This should suggest that rockets are not the most efficient means of escaping the Earth's gravity.

As the rocket accelerates skyward it must be losing energy relative to the field in which it exists, otherwise it would not move, as the process is a linear based concept of propulsion.

This explains why the rocket will fall back if it does not reach the 25,000 mph speed required to break free of the Earth's gravity.

If an aerospace system was gaining energy relative to the field in which it exists it would not fall back even if it did not reach the 25,000 mph speed which is presently thought to be necessary. For as long as it continued to gain energy relative to the field in which it exists, it would continue skyward with no concern for the speed of escape.

At the present we assess an increase in velocity to effect an increase in energy, but this is a false assumption, as an increase in velocity effects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy, as well as an increase in resistance to a further increase in velocity.

An increase in resistance cannot affect both an increase in resistance and an increase in energy, as it's either one or the other, but not both.

The underlying energy of field is non-resistive, as an increase in energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy.

If a falling mass which is accelerating affects an increase in resistance, that increase in resistance would slow it down unless it suffered a loss in energy relative to the accelerating field in which it is falling.

In other words, if the falling mass was gaining energy as it fell it would stop falling, as an increase in the energy of the mass relative to the field in which it exists would offset or counter the acceleration of the field.

Such a gain in energy relative to the field would force the mass to rise to a point where the field of the mass and the field of the Earth were in balance. Any further increase or decrease in energy relative to the field in which the mass is situated would cause the mass to either rise of fall.

So, there is a better way to get into space after all.

A Unified Field System

2005-05-30T23:43:00.000-07:00

To control gravity requires a FIELD FREQUENCY MODULATOR capable of modulating the underlying force in a controlled manner.

Such modulators exist naturally in a variety of different forms, the most common of which involves the vertical and horizontal relationship of a multi-phase ring structure, such as that incorporated into the structure of plants and trees.

In this respect the vertical and horizontal positioning of the xylem cells allows for the focusing of field in relation to the internal dynamics relative to the external dynamics.

In that the xylem are able to focus the internal dynamics in a controlled manner it is possible for the xylem to lift fluids from the roots to the extremities of a tree's growth, whereby hundreds of gallons of fluid are lifted and or lowered as required.

If you want to develop an anti-gravity devise, which replaces rockets, we must build a dynamic field system, which exists itself as a system of reference. This means that the universe exists relative to our system as a non-simultaneous condition of field, whereby the size of universe is regulated by our field frequency modulator.

A field frequency modulator regulates time, space and motion, in terms of a unified field system, as the condition of universe remains relative to the modulator.

The control comes from within as the energy of any system is focused to the center of field, which affects inversely proportional dynamic effects, in terms of the external and internal dynamics of field.

Although a modular field frequency modulator might exist in the earth's field, the modular field frequency modulator exists independent of the earth's field, as the modulator provides its own field in relation to a unified field system.

A four phase electromagnetic driver provides non-linear propulsion, which requires no fuel of any kind in relation to liquids, solids and or gases. It is a simple configuration of field which provides for lift and thrust.

There is no magic involved, nor is there any linear relationship corresponding to the space and motion involved, it is simply a matter of field focus.

The controlled modulation of the underlying energy potential modulates the ratio of energy per unit of mass. If there is a high enough ratio of energy per unit of mass the mass will rise skyward. When the mass reaches an altitude where the energy of the mass is equivalent to the field in which it is rising it will stop rising and hover. The mass will not fall unless it's energy level falls below that of the field in which it is positioned.

If its so simple, why hasn't it been done already????

Because the simplicity is overwhelming to the point that it insults our inherent attitude of intellectual superiority. We want it to be complicated in order to assert our importance. In fact we insist it be so and deny the possibility of a simple answer.

We define energy as a resistant force and wonder why our machines wear out, while we remain perplexed by the consumption of a fuel supply.

If energy was resistant, the universe would stop and we would not exist. It's an old problem and we still don't get it.

We conclude that energy does work, but fail to realize that all work is resistant, which is why we get tired.

We have built a house of cards that will eventually collapse, so it is important that we considered the non-resistant nature of energy, in terms of an underlying force of energy, as energy continues to support the existence of universe without the consumption of fuel. Yet we insist that the sun is powered by a process of fusion without considering that the conversion of mass to energy is a contradiction of logic, as such a process requires the mass to predetermine the potential of energy available.

And in this respect we do not consider that there should be a difference in the ratio of energy per unit of mass, because if we did we would realize that it was the underlying potential of energy which determined the dynamics of physical mass.

A black hole converts mass to energy, while the sun converts energy to mass, as the dynamics are reversed in relation to the two opposing conditions of field. Still we insist that mass can be converted to energy, while ignoring the obvious results of our efforts to date. Resistance is not energy, yet we insist that it is, if only to avoid the possibility of failure.

Resistance affects a decrease in energy and a further increase in resistance to any further increase in energy.

An increase in the underlying force of energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, while an increase in resistance affects a decrease in energy and an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

So, once we get the idea straight in our minds we will find that it would be impossible to run out of energy, as the underlying energy of any system is self sustaining and self perpetuating in terms of a relative unified field system.

The Solar Potential

2005-05-30T00:15:00.000-07:00

THE SUN IS THE FOCUS OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM, IN THAT THE ENERGY OF THE SUN IS FOCUSED TO THE CENTER OF THE SUN'S CORE.

THE UNDERLYING ENERGY OF THE SOLAR MASS IS ACCELERATING CONTINUOUSLY TO THE CENTER OF THE SOLAR CORE, WHEREBY THE INTERNAL DYNAMICS AND EXTERNAL DYNAMICS PRODUCE INVERSE RESPONSES IN RELATION TO GRAVITY AND ELECTROMAGNETISM.

THE GRAVITY OF THE SUN IS RELATIVELY WEAK, BUT DECREASES INWARDLY AND OUTWARDLY FROM THE SURFACE CURVE, WHILE THE ELECTROMAGNETIC POTENTIAL REMAINS PROPORTIONAL TO THE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL.

THIS CAUSES THE INNER CORE OF THE SUN TO BE MUCH COOLER THAN THE SURFACE CURVE, WHEREBY THE CENTER OF THE SUN'S CORE IS COLD AND NOT HOT.

THE RADIANT THERMAL HEAT OF THE SUN IS NOT THE PRODUCT OF INCREASED ENERGY, BUT THE PRODUCT OF REDUCED ENERGY ACROSS THE SURFACE CURVE OF THE SUN RELATIVE TO THE INNER CORE. IN OTHER WORDS THE RADIANT EFFECT IS THE PRODUCT OF RESISTANCE.

AS THE UNDERLYING ENERGY INCREASES TO THE CENTER OF FIELD THERE IS A DECREASE IN RESISTANCE TO A FURTHER INCREASE IN ENERGY, WHEREBY THE ENERGY POTENTIAL IS CONTINUOUSLY INCREASING. THIS CAUSES AN OUTFLOW OF RESISTANCE WHICH RADIATES OUTWARDLY. AND IN THIS RESPECT AN INCREASE IN RESISTANCE CORRESPONDS TO AN INCREASE IN RESISTANCE TO A FURTHER INCREASE IN ENERGY.

THERE EXISTS A NON-UNIFORM RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SUN AND THE PLANETS, WHEREBY THE DEGREE OF NON-UNIFORMITY INCREASES TOWARD THE SUN DUE TO THE SUN'S HIGHLY ENERGIZED STATE. THIS CAUSES A NON-UNIFORM DISTORTION TO BE OBSERVED FROM THE EARTH, WHEREBY A SOURCE OF LIGHT EXISTING BEYOND THE SUN IS SEEN TO BE BENT OUTWARD AND AWAY FROM THE SUN.

THE SUN EXISTING RELATIVE TO THE EARTH IS A HISTORICAL ASPECT OF THE SUN'S EXISTENCE, SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE AT THE PRESENT TIME FOR US ON EARTH TO KNOW THE CONDITION OF THE SUN IN TERMS OF THE SUN'S PRESENT STATE REMAINING RELATIVE TO THE SUN AS THE SYSTEM OF REFERENCE. AT THE PRESENT TIME THE SUN EXISTS RELATIVE TO THE EARTH AS THE SYSTEM OF REFERENCE, AS THE EARTH IS OUR SYSTEM OF REFERENCE. SO, THE CONDITION OF THE SUN EXISTING RELATIVE TO THE EARTH IS A NON-SIMULTANEOUS CONDITION WHICH REMAINS RELATIVE TO THE EARTH.

IF THE ENERGY POTENTIAL OF THE SUN IS CONTINUOUSLY INCREASING SO IS THE RADIATING OUTFLOW OF RESISTANCE, WHICH EFFECTS THE CONDITION OF THE EARTH. THIS WOULD INDICATE THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT SOMETHING WE CAN CONTROL, AS THE WHOLE SOLAR SYSTEM IS WARMING. CONSEQUENTLY GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT EXCLUSIVE TO OUR EARTH.

EVENTUALLY THE INCREASING DIFFERENTIAL IN ENERGY EXISTING BETWEEN THE SUN AND THE PLANETS WILL FORCE AT LEAST SOME OF THE PLANETS FROM THEIR EXISTING ORBITS AND REPOSITION THEM FURTHER FROM THE SUN.

AND DESPITE WHAT WE ARE TOLD THERE IS NO POLITICAL INITIATIVE WHICH CAN SAVE US FROM THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS NATURAL PROCESS. IT'S SIMPLY A CYCLICAL PROCESS.

THE CONCEPT OF THE SUN CONVERTING MASS TO ENERGY, IN TERMS OF A SUSTAINED FUSION REACTION, IS A FALSE CONCEPT, AS THERE IS NO CONSUMPTION OF FUEL.

OUR PERCEPTION OF ENERGY INVOLVES A FACTOR OF RESISTANCE, AS WE DO NOT CONSIDER AN UNDERLYING FORCE TO EVEN EXIST. CONSEQUENTLY OUR PERCEPTION OF ENERGY INVOLVES THE CONSUMPTION OF A FUEL OR THE CONVERSION OF PHYSICAL STRUCTURE, BUT THE CONSUMPTION OF A FUEL OR THE CONVERSION OF PHYSICAL STRUCTURE DOES NOT PRODUCE ENERGY, BUT DOES PRODUCE AN INCREASE IN RESISTANCE IN RELATION TO AN ACTUAL DECREASE IN ENERGY.

THEREFORE THE SUN IS ELECTRICALLY CHARGED AND THE THERMAL INCREASE IS DUE TO AN INCREASE IN THE UNDERLYING DIFFERENTIAL IN DYNAMIC POTENTIAL ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONDITION OF THE SUN REMAINING RELATIVE TO OUR EARTH.

IT HAS BEEN CONCLUDED THAT THE GRAVITY OF THE SUN HOLDS THE PLANETS IN ORBIT, BUT THE GRAVITY OF THE SUN IS FAR TOO WEAK TO HOLD THE PLANETS IN ORBIT. IT IS A DIFFERENTIAL IN ENERGY OR A DIFFERENTIAL IN DYNAMIC POTENTIAL WHICH MAINTAINS THE ORBITAL PROCESSION OF THE PLANETS AROUND THE SUN.

WITHOUT THE UNDERLYING FORCE OF ENERGY CONTINUOUSLY ACCELERATING TO THE CENTER OF FIELD THE SOLAR FIELD WOULD IMMEDIATELY COLLAPSE. IN OTHER WORDS IT IS THE ENERGY OF THE SUN WHICH HOLDS THE PLANETS IN ORBIT, IN TERMS OF A RELATIVE DIFFERENTIAL IN ENERGY BETWEEN THE SUN AND EACH PLANET. AND IN THIS RESPECT EACH DIFFERENTIAL IS DIFFERENT. AS WELL, THE DYNAMICS OF EACH DIFFERENTIAL IS DIFFERENT, WHEREBY EACH DIFFERENTIAL IS INCREASING AT A DIFFERENT RATE OF ACCELERATION.

THEREFORE IT IS POSSIBLE FOR ONE OR EVEN TWO PLANETS TO BE REMOVED FROM THEIR ORBIT AT PERIODIC INTERVALS, AS THE STABILITY OF THE VARIOUS ORBITS IS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERLYING DYNAMICS OF EACH PLANET RELATIVE TO THE DYNAMICS OF THE SUN.

AS THE ENERGY POTENTIAL OF THE SUN INCREASES SO DOES THE ENERGY RATIO PER UNIT OF THE SUNS MASS INCREASE IN A PROPORTIONAL MANNER, WITH THE HIGHEST ENERGY RATIO PER UNIT OF MASS EXISTING AT THE CENTER OF THE SOLAR CORE.

THE SUN IS LITERALLY GROWING IN PROPORTION TO THE UNDERLYING FORCE, WHEREBY THE SUN IS CONTINUOUSLY RECEDING FROM THE PLANETS IN A NON-LINEAR MANNER, WHILE THE POTENTIAL OF THE SUN'S RESISTANCE IS RADIATING AT AN EVER INCREASING RATE OF EXPANSION.

FROM THIS IT IS POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THAT THE APPARENT STABILITY OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM IS SUBJECT TO THE VARIABILITY OF A DYNAMIC SYSTEM, WHICH DIFFERS FROM SYSTEM TO SYSTEM IN TERMS OF THE EARTH/SUN SYSTEM, MARS/SUN SYSTEM ETC.

Trapped in a Dynamic State

2005-05-29T16:38:00.000-07:00

It would appear that we are trapped in the present moment, whereby the only aspect of Universe accessible to us corresponds to those conditions remaining relative to our planet Earth, in that planet Earth is our relative system of reference.
Despite the fact that all other systems remain relative to our Earth, they exist as either past or future conditions of those systems remaining relative to our Earth.
This causes a bit of a problem!
The present moment of every other system is beyond our reach. In other words we can't get there from here.
We are presently limited to past and future conditions relative to our present moment, which means we cannot contact a present condition other than our own.
We can employ linear based technology to get into space, but in doing so we remain within the confines of our Earth's field, in terms of a non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to our Earth.
We can access a historical aspect of our Moon, Sun and Mars etc. While we can access a future aspect of Jupiter and Saturn etc., but we cannot access the present of any other system without applying non-linear based technology allowing for instantaneous transformation, or time travel.
In this respect we must learn to traverse the simultaneous condition of Universe, whereby we are not hindered by either space or motion.
This might seem impossible, but it is hardly impossible. It is simply the only means by which to get from here to there in an efficient manner.
The existing avenue of access, restricted to linear based perceptions of space and motion, only allows us access to non-uniform conditions associated with all other systems of Universe. And in this respect we are subject to the radical effects of non-uniform potentials, which cause structural alterations on a molecular and cellular level.
Of course we can get to the moon and survive in the isolation of our space protective systems, but we dare not expose ourselves to direct contact with this foreign environment, as to do so would expose us to direct contact with non-uniform potentials, whereby such non-uniform potentials cause genetic deformities, cancerous anomalies and in the case of the moon, accelerated growth.
NASA will insist that this is not possible, but NASA is not telling the truth, as I was privy to the original test results which occurred during the Apollo Missions, which involved the testing of lunar geological samples to determine if they might produce any harmful effects or represent a hazard to the Earth's ecology.
The various plants and animals subjected to and injected with pulverized lunar material in solution with water suffered genetic deformities, cancerous anomalies and accelerated growth.
Sending robotic systems to our neighbor planets is all very fine, but they are restricted to past and or future conditions remaining relative to our Earth.
We are not robots, we are living organisms, consequently we would not survive as the robots do.
Extraterrestrial materials in the form of solids, liquids or gases exist beyond the relative limits of our existing environment, in relation to non-uniform conditions existing relative to the uniform condition of our field system.
Therefore we cannot utilize the raw resources of space without putting our health and safety at risk.
We are prisoners of our own relative condition.
Water existing on other planets or moons is not fit for our human consumption, as such water maintains a non-uniform relationship with our earthly environment.

If we want to explore space in a meaningful and productive manner we must develop new and more modern technology based on non-linear principles.

There is no excuse for our ignorance in this respect, as we have already performed numerous experiments which indicate clearly the certainty of our situation.

Space is not an option to our survival without the appropriate science and technology. To date the reality of our situation is denied on the basis of wishing to keep the population ignorant, whereby the population continues to fund outdated and useless technology, which promises free access to the resources of space.

Hocus pocus science and rockets is not the answer.

The only answer is non-linear science and technology based upon the principles of field dynamics.

It's time for a new dawn to be breaking.