Light Speed

Light Speed

The idea that the speed of light remains constant requires the condition of Universe be a static state, which suggests the possibility of an absolute condition existing within a relative Universe.

The speed of light having been determined to be exactly 299,792,458 meters per second is based on the assumption that the light itself is in linear motion relative to the field in which it exists, which requires the field to remain static relative to the motion of light. In other words, the light is thought to be in motion independent of the field in which it exists.

But as the field in which the light exists is not static, but dynamic, it would appear impossible for the light to be in motion independent of the field. It would seem equally impossible for the speed of light to remain constant as this would require the speed of light to represent an absolute value.

It would appear that in a dynamic Universe the speed of light would remain a relative variable, in that the speed of light would remain relative to the system of reference, whereby the speed of light would be different for every system in motion, just as time is different for every system in motion.

Therefore the speed of light is different for every atomic element, planet, moon and star etc. This would indicate that there must be an upper and lower limit to the speed of light, corresponding to the field dynamics associated with the system of reference.

This would further indicate that by modulating the underlying force of Universe in a controlled manner it would be possible to modulate the speed of light, whereby the field dynamics associated with the modulating system would determine the relative speed of light.

In this respect the controlled modulation of the underlying force would over-ride the limitations of light speed in terms of a universal constant restricting an upper limit to the velocity of a body in space. Therefore the upper speed limit of Universe is determined on the basis of those field dynamics associated with the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

Furthermore, should the dynamic upper limit of any relative system be reached relative to the field in which it is being observed, that relative system would be forced from the non-simultaneous conditon of Universe remaining relative to the field of the observer and into the simultaneous condition of Universe, whereby it would simply vanish from the field in which the observer exists.

In relation to this situation, the simultaneous condition of Universe includes both past and future conditions remaining relative to the non-absolute present moment of the system of reference, whereby both past and future conditions remain accessible in terms of the present moment remaining relative to the system of reference.

This means that both past and or future conditions of those systems existing as a portion of the non-simultaneous condition of Universe, remain relative to the system of reference, which would indicate that both the past and future remain as valid as the non-absolute present moment.

In other words, the past and or future are no less valid than the present moment, whereby it would seem extremely difficult for us to determine whether we exist in the past or future of our Earth's existence, as there is no absolute present moment by which to make such a distinction between past and future, in terms of a relative non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to our Earth.

Whether we exist in the past or future we will always perceive ourselves to be existing in the present moment, in terms of existing in a non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to our system of reference.

This indicates that we might otherwise remain unaware that the condition of the Sun and or Moon remaining relative to our Earth are historical conditions of those systems, in that time is different for every system in motion.

Therefore, the condition of the Sun and Moon determine a non-uniform differential in time relative to the condition of our Earth, whereby all three systems share a non-uniform relationship in terms of those field dynamics determining their relative form and function.

From this it would seem apparent that there exists a differential in dynamic potential determining the condition of each system, whereby the condition of each system relative to the condition of every other system remains relative to an underlying force of energy determining the condition of field. And in this respect the condition of field only remains relative to the system or reference.

Consequently it would seem apparent that we have barely begun to consider the possibilities available to us.