Gravity Control Idealism

Gravity Control Idealism attempts to understand the underlyiing dynamics of Universe, whereby it might be possible to control gravity and electromagnetism in a manner allowing for the needs of our planet.

Friday, November 04, 2005

The Aether

The Aether

I recently read, “By now it should be obvious that the larger the mass the more aether flows into the atomic structure of the mass.”

This statement sounds fairly straight forward, but it is anything but straight forward.  It throws a real curve ball into the works, as it could be read to mean that the larger mass receives more energy from the aether.

In part this is true, but in part it is false, as it depends on the circumstances of the situation involved, which are not specified.  It is simply stated to represent a general rule, which is far from an accurate statement.

The Earth has a greater mass, in terms of a general perception of mass, than the moon, but there is more aether flowing into the moon than the Earth.  On the other hand the Sun has a greater mass than the Earth whereby there is more aether flowing into the Sun than the Earth.

Each atomic structure has its own field, which means that each atomic structure has its own aether flow focused to the center of field.

As a high mass atomic structure is more resistant to the field in which it exists than a low mass atomic structure the high mass atomic structures receive less energy per unit of mass than the low mass atomic structures.

In other words a hydrogen atom has more energy than an oxygen atom, because the field of the hydrogen atom is less resistant to the aether flow.

But, in a more general sense a greater mass of hydrogen, involving many hydrogen atoms, has a greater flow of aether into its structure than a smaller mass of hydrogen.

Still, a deuterium atom has less energy than a protium atom and a tritium atom has less energy than a deuterium atom, in relation to a ratio of energy to mass.

So, the idea that a larger mass corresponds to a large energy potential is not completely correct or completely true.  The idea is misleading and gives one a very distorted view of energy in relation to a proportional potential of energy corresponding to a proportional quantity of mass, as no such proportional relationship exists.

In that the mass is resistant to the flow of the aether or the mass is resistant to the field in which it exists, it would appear that the larger the mass the more resistance there would be to the flow of the aether.

In other words the larger or greater the mass, the less aether flows into the structure of the mass, because the increased resistance slows the aether flow.

The aether is a field of frequency which is continuously accelerating; therefore it is the rate of acceleration which determines the flow of the aether, consequently, the greater the resistance the slower the rate of acceleration affecting the atomic structure of the mass.

This is where assumptions become problematic, as it is assumed on the basis of energy being proportional to mass that an increase in mass would always indicate an increase in energy.

If we examine the equation E=MC2 we will see that this equation only holds true under certain conditions, such as where the ratio of energy to mass is the same for all elements.  In other words, according to this equation the ratio of energy to mass is the same for every element, when in fact such a thing is a relative impossibility.

This is an important point, which must be considered, as the idea of each and every element having an equal ratio of energy to mass distorts our perception of energy and allows us to reflect on a false assessment.

The ratio of energy to mass must be different for each and every element, otherwise there would be no dynamic difference existing between the elements, as the only difference would be a question of mass.

If each and every element is resistant to the aether or the field in which they collectively exist, then the ratio of resistance to mass would be the same for all of the elements, as it is the mass which is resistant to the aether, whereby any mass must respond to the field in which it exists in a proportional manner regardless of its mass.  This is demonstrated by two unequal masses falling at the same rate of acceleration.

It must be realized that energy and resistance are two completely different things, which work in opposition to each other.

Energy is a non-resistant force, in that an increase in energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, whereas mass is resistant in that an increase in mass affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

Likewise a decrease in energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy and an increase in mass.

The aether is the field itself in which any mass exists, and as such the underlying force of energy determines the condition of the aether or the field.

As the energy involves the dynamic potential of the aether, in relation to an accelerating field of frequency, a decrease in the acceleration of the field affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

And as the energy of any element is focused to the center of the atomic structure, the element with the smallest mass must have the highest potential of energy, in relation to a ratio of energy to mass.

It should be apparent that this explanation represents a direct contradiction to that which the equation E=MC2 is attempting to convey.  In other words, the equation E=MC2 is not a valid statement.  The energy represented by E is not energy at all, as energy has been confused with resistance.

This in itself would indicate that it would be exceedingly difficult to discover a method of extracting energy from the aether without knowing exactly what energy is.

Energy is a non-resistant underlying force in the form of non-linear time field frequency acceleration determining the form and function of physical structure.

The aether is the medium of non-linear time field frequency acceleration, in that both the aether and the field of frequency are one and the same.  The aether is not something separate from the field, as the aether is the field just as the field is the aether.

In this respect it would be impossible to extract energy from the aether, as the aether is not itself something separate from energy, as the energy and the aether or the field is one and the same thing.  You could not have energy without the aether or field, so in order to employ the energy of the aether the energy must be employed as a field function.

And in order to employ the energy of the aether as a field function requires a method by which to modulate the aether itself or to modulate the field itself, as the field and the aether refer to the same thing.

So whether we call it the aether or we call it the field, it is the field which we want to modulate in order to access the underlying energy of the field.

Every atom has a field, every planet has a field, every moon has a field and every star has a field etc. and the underlying energy of each field is different.

In other words, the ratio of energy to mass is different for every system.  And to be sure we understand what this means, we must realize that the ratio of energy to mass means that energy and mass are not the same thing at all.

Now, we’ll take this one step further, if we have a gram of gold, the average energy potential of each atom constituting the gram of gold can be said to be of a certain value.  But if we separate the individual atoms constituting the gram of gold the total energy potential of all the atoms will be greater than when they were combined as a one gram bar.

If we had two one gram bars of gold and combined them into one single bar weighing two grams, the two gram bar would have less energy than two one gram bars.

This is what is meant by a ratio of energy to mass, as an increase or decrease in mass changes the ratio of energy to mass.  

I am hopeful that this explanation will make it a little easier to understand how to go about accessing an alternate energy source, as well as achieving gravity control.

© 2005 David Barclay  

1 Comments:

At 1:06 PM, Blogger Vimana_Pilot said...

I think the first questions to ask here are: (1) is there such a medium as aether? and (2) if aether is real, does it contain or transmit energy in any useable way? Establishment scientists like Stephen Hawking don't speak of aether is this way. They hold to Newton's principles regarding energy. They may have overlooked something and, if so, we need to do uniform repeatable experiments to verify or disprove the theory.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tracking