Rings & Lifters

There is a lot of interest in the levitation of rings and lifters, in relation to the possibility of these experimental models resulting in the control of gravity.

In all of these cases, an electrical current is induced into the metallic structure of the model, which results in the observed levitation.  Yet, it would appear that a satisfactory explanation for the resulting levitation is not forthcoming.

I would suggest that such demonstrations involving levitation do not represent the controlled modulation of gravity, but more accurately represent a distortion of the field associated with the structural dynamics of the various models reacting to the field in which the model exists.

To understand this situation it must be affirmed that gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but is merely a dynamic response corresponding to the potential of an underlying force of energy inherent to the field in which we presently exist.

Therefore the falling or rising of any physical structure is based upon the condition of field, where the dynamics of a physical structure respond to the condition of the field in which the physical structure exists.

For a physical structure to levitate or rise skyward there must be an increase in the underlying force of energy affecting the dynamics of the physical structure relative to the field in which it is levitating.  In other words the resistance of the physical structure to the field in which it is situated must be decreased.

For a physical structure to fall, understanding that falling is dynamic motion, there must be a decrease in the underlying force of energy affecting the dynamics of the physical structure relative to the field in which it is falling.  In other words the resistance of the physical structure to the field in which it is situated must be increased.

As there are both internal and external dynamics affecting any physical structure, the internal and external dynamics remain inversely proportional in relation to an internal and external gravitational response with the electromagnetic potential remaining proportional to the gravitational response.

In this respect the gravitational response decreases symmetrically from the surface curve to the center of field and decreases isometrically from the surface curve to the perimeter of Universe, while the electromagnetic response remains proportional to the gravitational response.

When an electrical charge is applied to the conductive framework of a ring or lifter it affects an inversely proportional response internally, in relation to the internal dynamics responding to the external dynamics.  As it is an electromagnetic response which is induced this affects an increase in the resistance of the ring or lifter to the field in which the ring or lifter is situated.  This corresponds to a decrease in the energy potential of the ring or lifter, which actually increases the gravitational response of the ring or lifter.  This is the exact opposite of what was intended or thought to be demonstrated, as this is actually anti-antigravity and not antigravity.

This in turn causes the ring of lifter to be repelled upward, much like two like poles being repelled.

As soon as the charge is discontinued the ring or lifter experiences an immediate decrease in resistance to the field in which it exists, causing the ring or lifter to fall rather than rise.

This is similar to the experiment where a frog is made to move its legs in response to an electrical charge, but the simple manipulation of a frog’s legs does not constitute control of the frog or the control of the frog’s life force.

The same is true of the ring or lifter, as the levitation of the ring or lifter by means of an electrical charge does not constitute gravity control or even the controlled modulation of the ring or lifter’s underlying dynamics.
  


© 2006 David Barclay